Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T04:05:16.860Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Feeding ecology of Enteroctopus megalocyathus (Cephalopoda: Octopodidae) in southern Chile

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 June 2008

Christian M. Ibáñez  and
Javier V. Chong
Christian M. Ibáñez*
Affiliation:
Instituto de Ecología y Biodiversidad, Departamento de Ciencias Ecológicas, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Chile, PO Box 563, Santiago, Chile
Javier V. Chong
Affiliation:
Departamento de Ecología Costera, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Católica de la Santísima Concepción, P.O. BOX 297, Concepción, Chile
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: Christian M. IbáñezInstituto de Ecología y BiodiversidadDepartamento de Ciencias Ecológicas, Facultad de Ciencias Universidad de Chile, PO Box 563, Santiago, Chile email: christianibez@yahoo.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this research we studied the diet of Enteroctopus megalocyathus from three principal locations of the octopus fishery (Ancud, Quellón and Melinka) in southern Chile. The gastric contents of 523 individuals, collected between October 1999 and September 2000, were examined and statistically analysed. Diet composition was described using detrended correspondence analysis and analysed as a function of predator gender, body size and fishing area. Food items were found in ~50% of the octopuses examined and a total of 14 prey items were recognized. The diet of E. megalocyathus consisted primarily in brachyuran and anomuran crustaceans, fish and conspecifics. The diet differed in composition between fishing zones and mantle length of the specimens and size of octopuses varied between locations. After adjusting for octopus mantle length, diet composition was found to be different between fishing areas. Large octopuses fed on large crabs at Ancud, while in Quellón and Melinka small octopuses fed mainly on small crustaceans. There were no differences in prey composition between the gender and the size of octopuses was a better predictor of the variance in the diet composition (16%) than the fishing zone (6%). Cannibalism may become an important issue when food is scarce and/or at high population density.

Keywords

dietEnteroctopus megalocyathuscannibalismChile
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 88 , Issue 4 , August 2008 , pp. 793 - 798
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agresti, A. (2002) Categorical data analysis, 2nd edn.Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ambrose, R.F. (1984) Food preferences, prey availability, and the diet of Octopus bimaculatus Verril. Journal of Experimemtal Marine Biology and Ecology 77, 29–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ambrose, R.F. (1986) Effects of octopus predation on motile invertebrates in a rocky subtidal community. Marine Ecology Progress Series 30, 261–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ambrose, R.F. (1997) Octopus bimaculatus. In Lang, M. and Hochberg, F.G. (eds) Proceedings of the workshop on the fishery and market potential of octopus in California. Washington: Smithsonian Institution, pp. 11–22.Google Scholar
Ambrose, R.F. and Nelson, B.V. (1983) Predation by Octopus vulgaris in the Mediterranean. Marine Ecology PSZN 4, 251–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, T.J. (1999) Morphology and biology of Octopus maorum Hutton 1880 in northern New Zealand. Bulletin of Marine Science 65, 657–676.Google Scholar
Aronson, R.B. (1986) Life history and den ecology of Octopus briareus Robson in a marine lake. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 95, 37–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calow, P. (1998) The encyclopedia of ecology and environmental management. London: Blackwell Science.Google Scholar
Cortez, T., Castro, B.G. and Guerra, A. (1995) Feeding dynamics of Octopus mimus (Mollusca: Cephalopoda) in northern Chile waters. Marine Biology 123, 497–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grubert, M., Wadley, V. and White, R. (1999) Diet and feeding strategy of Octopus maorum in southeast Tasmania. Bulletin of Marine Science 65, 441–451.Google Scholar
Guerra, A. (1978) Sobre la alimentación y el comportamiento alimentario de Octopus vulgaris. Investigación Pesquera 42, 351–364.Google Scholar
Hyslop, E. (1980) Stomach content analysis—a review of methods and their application. Journal of Fish Biology 17, 411–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jongman, R.H.G., Ter Braaka, C.J.F. and Van Tongeren, O.F.R. (1995) Data analysis in communities and landscape ecology. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muñoz, G., Valdebenito, V. and George-Nascimento, M. (2002) La dieta y la fauna de parásitos metazoos del torito Bovichthys chilensis Regan 1914 (Pisces: Bovichthydae) en la costa de Chile centro-sur: variaciones geográficas y ontogenéticas. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 75, 66–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pardo-Gandarillas, M.C., Garcías, F. and George-Nascimento, M. (2004) La dieta y la fauna de endoparásitos del pejesapo Gobiesox marmoratus Jenyns, 1842 (Pisces: Gobiesocidae) en el litoral central de Chile están conectadas pero no correlacionadas. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 77, 627–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ré, M.E. (1998) Pulpos Octopódidos (Cephalopoda, Octopodidae). In Boschi, E. (ed.) El mar Argentino y sus Recursos Pesqueros 2. Mar del Plata: Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo Pesquero, Secretaría de Agricultura, Ganadería, Pesca y Alimentación, pp. 87–91.Google Scholar
Ré, M.E. and Gómez-Simes, E. (1992) Hábitos alimentarios del pulpo (Octopus tehuelchus). I. Análisis cuali-cuantitativos de la dieta en el intermareal de Puerto Lobos, Golfo San Matías (Argentina). Frente Marítimo 11, 119–128.Google Scholar
Rocha, F. (1997) Cephalopods in Chilean waters, a review. Malacological Review 30, 101–113.Google Scholar
Rocha, F.J., Guerra, A. and González, A.F. (2001) A review of reproductive strategies in cephalopods. Biological Review 76, 291–304.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rocha, F.J. and Vega, M.A. (2003) Overview of cephalopod fisheries in Chilean waters. Fisheries Research 60, 151–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodhouse, P.G. and Nigmatullin, C.M. (1996) Role as consumers. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 351, 1003–1022.Google Scholar
Roper, C., Sweeney, J. and Nauen, C. (1984) Cephalopods of the World (FAO species catalogue volume 3), an annotated and illustrated catalogue of species of interest to fisheries. FAO Fisheries Synopsis 3, 1–127.Google Scholar
Rosa, R., Marques, A.M., Nunes, M.L., Bandarra, N. and Reis, C.S. (2004) Spatial-temporal changes in dimethyl acetal (Octadecanal) levels of Octopus vulgaris (Mollusca: Cephalopoda): relation to feeding ecology. Scientia Marina 68, 227–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SERNAPESCA (2002) Anuario estadístico de pesca. Servicio Nacional de Pesca, Ministerio de Economía, Fomento y Reconstrucción, Chile.Google Scholar
SERNAPESCA (2003) Anuario estadístico de pesca. Servicio Nacional de Pesca, Ministerio de Economía, Fomento y Reconstrucción, Chile.Google Scholar
SERNAPESCA (2004) Anuario estadístico de pesca. Servicio Nacional de Pesca, Ministerio de Economía, Fomento y Reconstrucción, Chile.Google Scholar
Smale, M. and Buchan, P. (1981) Biology of Octopus vulgaris off the East Coast of South Africa. Marine Biology 65, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, C.D. (2003) Diet of Octopus vulgaris in False Bay, South Africa. Marine Biology 143, 1127–1133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Summers, W.C. (1983) Physiological and trophic ecology of cephalopods. In Russell-Hunter, W.D. (ed.) The Mollusca, Volume 6 ecology. London: Academic Press, pp. 261–279.Google Scholar
Vincent, T.L.S., Scheel, D. and Hough, K.R. (1998) Some aspect of the diet and foraging behaviour of Octopus dofleini (Wulker, 1910) in its northernmost range. Marine Ecology PSZN 19, 13–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, J.B., Kenchington, E. and O'Dor, R.K. (1998) Reproduction and embryonic development time of Bathypolypus arcticus, a deep-sea octopod (Cephalopoda: Octopoda). Malacologia 39, 11–19.Google Scholar
Zar, J.H. (1984) Biostatistical analysis. Second edition. New York: Prentice-Hall, Inc.Google Scholar