Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T14:52:42.797Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Metacognitions about Procrastination: A Preliminary Investigation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 February 2008

Bruce A. Fernie  and
Marcantonio M. Spada
Bruce A. Fernie
Affiliation:
Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
Marcantonio M. Spada*
Affiliation:
Roehampton University, London, UK
*
Reprint requests to Marcantonio M. Spada, School of Human and Life Sciences, Roehampton University, Whitelands College, Holybourne Avenue, London SW15 4JD, UK. E-mail: m.spada@roehampton.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Procrastination can have deleterious effects on well-being. Despite this, little is known about cognitive-attentional processes involved in procrastination. In this study, 12 individuals self-reporting problematic procrastination were assessed using a semi-structured interview to investigate: (1) whether they held positive and/or negative metacognitive beliefs about procrastination; (2) what was their main goal in procrastinating, and how they knew if they had achieved their goal; (3) how they directed their focus of attention when procrastinating; and (4) what they perceived the advantages and disadvantages of these attentional strategies to be. Results indicated that participants endorsed both positive and negative metacognitive beliefs about procrastination, and that the goal of procrastination was to regulate cognition and negative affect. Participants reported that they either did not know how to determine if they had achieved their goal or that an improvement in mood would signal the goal was achieved. Participants also reported that the principal object of their attentional focus when procrastinating was their emotional state. All participants were able to identify disadvantages to their attentional strategies, whilst nine participants described perceived advantages. The implications of the findings are discussed.

Keywords

Metacognitionsmetacognitive beliefsprocrastination
Type
Brief Clinical Reports
Information
Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy , Volume 36 , Issue 3 , May 2008 , pp. 359 - 364
Copyright
Copyright © British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ellis, A. and Knaus, W. J. (1977). Overcoming procrastination. In Ferrari, J. R., Johnson, J. L. and McCown, W. G. (Eds.), Procrastination and Task Avoidance: theory, research and treatment. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Lay, C. H. (1986). At last, my research article on procrastination. Journal of Research in Personality, 20, 474–495.Google Scholar
Mann, L. (1982). Decision-making questionnaire. In Ferrari, J. R., Johnson, J. L. and McCown, W. G. (Eds.), Procrastination and Task Avoidance: theory, research and treatment. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Shoham-Saloman, V., Avner, R. and Neeman, R. (1989). You're changed if you do and changed if you don't: mechanisms underlying paradoxical interventions. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57, 590–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spada, M. M., Hiou, K. and Nikčević, A. V. (2006). Metacognitions, emotions and procrastination. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 20, 319–326.Google Scholar
Stöber, J. and Joorman, J. (2001). Worry, procrastination and perfectionism: differentiating amount of worry, pathological worry, anxiety and depression. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 25, 49–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, A. (2000). Emotional Disorders and Metacognition: innovative cognitive therapy. Chichester, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
Wells, A. and Cartwright-Hatton, S. (2004). A short form of the metacognitions questionnaire: properties of the MCQ-30. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 42, 385–396.Google Scholar
Wells, A. and Matthews, G. (1994). Attention and Emotion: a clinical perspective. Hove, UK: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.