Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T00:43:47.977Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

One Hundred 30 Dors?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2007

M. M. Hanson  and
B. Popescu
M. M. Hanson
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA email: margaret.hanson@uc.edu, popescb@email.uc.edu
B. Popescu
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA email: margaret.hanson@uc.edu, popescb@email.uc.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

There are a few ways to estimate the number of massive open clusters expected in the disk of the Milky Way, such as the total star formation rate of the Galaxy, or the open cluster mass function extrapolated to include the entire Galaxy. Surprisingly, they give similar predictions: the Milky Way should contain about 100 clusters as massive as 30 Doradus. Are we seeing them? We look closely at these predictions and compare them to what has been found so far in our Galaxy. We present sophisticated image simulations our group is developing to estimate the selection biases faced by current infrared searches for these massive clusters.

Keywords

Galaxy: stellar content – open clusters and associations: general – stars: early-type
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 3 , Symposium S250: Massive Stars as Cosmic Engines , December 2007 , pp. 307 - 312
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2008

References

Ascenso, J., Alves, J., Vicente, S., & Lago, M. T. V. T. 2007, A&A, 476, 199Google Scholar
Brandner, W., Clark, J. S., Stolte, A. et al. 2008, A&A, 478, 137Google Scholar
Bibby, J. L., Crowther, P. A., Furness, J. P., & Clark, J. S. 2008, MNRAS, 386, 23Google Scholar
Bertin, E. 2001, SkyMaker, http://terapix.iap.fr/cplt/oldSite/soft/skymaker/xsGoogle Scholar
Bertin, E. & Fouqué, P. 2007, SkyMaker, http://terapix.iap.fr/rubrique.php?id_rubrique=221Google Scholar
Borissova, J., Ivonov, V., & Hanson, M. M. 2008, A&A, acceptedGoogle Scholar
Cardelli, J. A., Clayton, G. C., & Mathis, J. S. 1989, ApJ, 345, 245Google Scholar
Clark, J. S. & Negueruela, I. 2002, A&A, 396, L25Google Scholar
Davies, B., Figer, D. F., Kudritzki, R.-P. et al. 2007, ApJ, 671, 781Google Scholar
Davies, B., Figer, D. F., Law, C. J. et al. 2008, ApJ 676, 1016Google Scholar
Elmegreen, B. G. & Efremov, Y. N. 1997, ApJ, 480, 235Google Scholar
Figer, D. F., McLean, I. S. & Morris, M. 1999, ApJ, 514, 202Google Scholar
Figer, D. F., Najarro, F., Gilmore, D. et al. 2002, ApJ, 581, 258Google Scholar
Harayama, Y., Eisenhauer, F., Martins, F. 2008, ApJ, 675, 1319Google Scholar
Hodge, P. W. 1961, ApJ, 133, 413Google Scholar
Holtzman, J. A., Faber, S. M., Shaya, E. J. et al. 1992, AJ, 103, 691Google Scholar
Homeier, N. L. & Alves, J. 2005, A&A, 430, 481Google Scholar
Kennicutt, R. C., Edgar, B. K., Hodge, P. 1989, ApJ, 337, 791Google Scholar
King, I. 1962, AJ, 67, 471Google Scholar
Kroupa, P. 2002, Sci, 295, 82Google Scholar
Kurtev, R., Borissova, J., Georgiev, L., et al. 2007, A&A, 475, 209Google Scholar
Lada, C. J., Lada, E. A. 2003, ARA&A 41, 57Google Scholar
Larsen, S. S. & Richtler, T. 2000, A&A, 354, 836Google Scholar
Larsen, S. S. 2002, AJ, 354, 836Google Scholar
Lejeune, T. & Schaerer, D. 2001, A&A, 366, 538Google Scholar
McKee, C. F. & Williams, J. P. 1997, ApJ, 476, 144Google Scholar
Naab, T. & Ostriker, J. P. 2006, MNRAS, 366, 899Google Scholar
O'Connell, R. W., Gallagher, J. S., Hunter, D. A. 1994, ApJ, 433, 65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oey, M. S. & Clarke, C. J. 1998, AJ, 115, 1543Google Scholar
Oey, M. S. & Clarke, C. J. 2005, ApJ, 620, L43Google Scholar
Paumard, T., Genzel, R., Martins, F. et al. 2006, ApJ, 643, 1011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prantzos, N. & Aubert, O. 1995, A&A, 302, 69Google Scholar
Salpeter, E. E. 1955, ApJ, 121, 161SGoogle Scholar
Serabyn, E., Shupe, D. & Figer, D. F. 1998, Nature, 394, 448Google Scholar
Skrutskie, M. F., Cutri, R. M., Stiening, R., et al. , 2006, AJ, 131, 1163Google Scholar
van den Bergh, S 1971, A&A, 12, 474Google Scholar
van den Bergh, S, Lafontaine, A. 1984, AJ, 89, 1822Google Scholar
Weidner, C., Kroupa, P. & Larsen, S. S. 2004, MNRAS 350, 1503Google Scholar
Weidner, C., Kroupa, P. 2006, MNRAS 365, 1333Google Scholar
Whitmore, B. C., Schweizer, F., Leitherer, C. et al. 1993, AJ, 106, 1354Google Scholar
Whitmore, B. C. & Schweizer, F. 1995, AJ, 109, 960Google Scholar
Zhang, Q, Fall, M. 1999, ApJL, 527, 81Google Scholar