Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-995ml Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T17:29:48.947Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Evolutionary State of the Cool Hypergiants – Episodic Mass Loss, Convective Activity and Magnetic Fields

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2007

Roberta M. Humphreys*
Affiliation:
Astronomy Dept., University of Minnesota, 116 Church St. SE., Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA email: roberta@umn.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The evolved cool stars near the empirical upper luminosity boundary in the HR Diagram all show evidence for considerable instability perhaps due to their proximity to this stability limit and/or their evolutionary state. Recent high resolution imaging and spectroscopy of several of these stars have revealed a subset characterized by complex ejecta and evidence for episodic mass loss driven by convective activity and magnetic fields. This group includes famous stars such as the red supergiants VY CMa, NML Cyg and the post RSG IRC +10420. I will review the observational evidence and discuss the implications for the final stages of these evolved stars, their mass loss mechanism, and evolutionary state.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2008

References

Barvainis, R., McIntosh, G., & Predmore, C. R. 1987, Nature, 329, 613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Jager, C. 1998, A&AR, 8, 145Google Scholar
Gottleib, E. W. & Liller, W. 1978, ApJ, 225, 488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphreys, R. M. & Davidson, K. 1979, ApJ, 232, 409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphreys, R. M., Jones, T. J., & Gehrz, R. D. 1987, AJ, 94, 315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphreys, R. M. & Davidson, K. 1994, PASP, 106, 1025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphreys, R. M., Smith, N., Davidson, K., et al. 1997, AJ, 114, 2778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphreys, R. M., Davidson, K., & Smith, N. 2002, AJ, 124, 1026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphreys, R. M., Davidson, K., Ruch, G., & Wallerstein, G. 2005, AJ, 129, 492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphreys, R. M., Jones, T. J., Polomski, E., et al. 2006, AJ, 131, 2105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphreys, R. M., Helton, L. A., & Jones, T. J. 2007, AJ, 133, 2716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, T. J., Humphreys, R. M., Gehrz, R. D., et al. 1993, ApJ, 411, 323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, T. J., Humphreys, R. M., Helton, L. A., et al. 2007, AJ, 133, 2730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemball, A. J. & Diamond, P. J. 1997, ApJ, 481, L111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lobel, A., Dupree, A. K., Stefanik, R. P., et al. 2003, ApJ, 583, 923CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masheder, M. R.W., van Langevelde, H. J., Richards, A. M. S., et al. 1999, New Astron., 43, 563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, M. & Jura, M. 1983, ApJ, 267, 179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nedoluha, G. E. & Bowers, P. F. 1992, ApJ, 392, 249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oudmaijer, R. D. 1998, A&AS, 129, 541Google Scholar
Oudmaijer, R. D., Groenewegen, M. A. T., Matthews, H. E., et al. 1996, MNRAS, 280, 1062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, A. M. S., Yates, J. A., & Cohen, R. J. 1996, MNRAS, 282, 665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schuster, M. T., Humphreys, R. M., & Marengo, M. 2006, AJ, 131, 603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schuster, M. T. 2008, in preparationGoogle Scholar
Schwarzschild, M. 1975, ApJ, 195, 137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, N., Humphreys, R. M., Davidson, K., et al. 2001, AJ, 121, 1111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szymczak, M. & Cohen, R. J. 1997, MNRAS, 288, 945CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vlemmings, W. H. T., Diamond, P. J., & van Langevelde, H. J. 2002, A&A, 394, 589Google Scholar
Vlemmings, W. H. T., van Langevelde, H. J., & Diamond, P. J. 2005, A&A, 434, 1029Google Scholar