Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-10T22:09:39.276Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the hydrodynamics of ‘slip–stick’ spheres

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2008

JAMES W. SWAN  and
ADITYA S. KHAIR
JAMES W. SWAN
Affiliation:
Division of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91106, USA
ADITYA S. KHAIR
Affiliation:
Division of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91106, USA Department of Chemical Engineering, University of California Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The breakdown of the no-slip condition at fluid–solid interfaces generates a host of interesting fluid-dynamical phenomena. In this paper, we consider such a scenario by investigating the low-Reynolds-number hydrodynamics of a novel ‘slip–stick’ spherical particle whose surface is partitioned into slip and no-slip regions. In the limit where the slip length is small compared to the size of the particle, we first compute the translational velocity of such a particle due to the force density on its surface. Subsequently, we compute the rotational velocity and the response to an ambient straining field of a slip–stick particle. These three Faxén-type formulae are rich in detail about the dynamics of the particles: chiefly, we find that the translational velocity of a slip–stick sphere is coupled to all of the moments of the force density on its surface; furthermore, such a particle can migrate parallel to the velocity gradient in a shear flow. Perhaps most important is the coupling we predict between torque and translation (and force and rotation), which is uncharacteristic of spherical particles in unbounded Stokes flow and originates purely from the slip–stick asymmetry.

Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 606 , 10 July 2008 , pp. 115 - 132
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, J. L. 1985 Effect of non-uniform zeta potential on particle movement in electric fields. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 105, 45–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, J. L. 1989 Colloid transport by interfacial forces. Annu. Rev. Fluid. Mech. 21 61–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batchelor, G. K. 2000 An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Einzel, D., Panzer, P. & Liu, M. 1990 Boundary condition for fluid flow: curved or rough surfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 2269–2272.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Golestanian, R., Liverpool, T. B. & Ajdari, A. 2007 Designing phoretic micro- and nano- swimmers. New J. Phys. 9, 126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Happel, J. & Brenner, H. 1986 Low Reynolds Number Hydrodynamics, 2nd edn.Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Hocking, L. M. 1976 A moving fluid interface on a rough surface. J. Fluid Mech. 78, 801–817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, S. & Karrila, S. J. 1991, 2005 Microhydrodynamics, 2nd edn.Dover.Google Scholar
Ladyzhenskaya, O. A. 1963 The Mathematical Theory of Viscous Incompressible Flow. Gordon and Breach.Google Scholar
Lamb, H. 1993 Hydrodynamics, 6th edn.Dover.Google Scholar
Nie, Z., Li, W., Seo, M., Xu, S. & Kumacheva, E. 2006 Janus and ternary particles generated by microfluidic synthesis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 9408–9412.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cayre, O., Paunov, V. N. & Velev, O. D. 2003 Fabrication of asymmetrically coated colloid particles by microcontact printing techniques. J. Mat. Chem. 13, 2445–2450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perro, A., Reculusa, S., Ravaine, S., Boureat-Lami, E. & Duguet, E. 2005 Design and synthesis of janus micro- and nanoparticles. J. Mat. Chem. 15, 3745–3760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, P. A. & Robbins, M. O. 1990 a Origin of stick-slip motion in boundary lubrication. Science 250, 792–794.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thompson, P. A. & Robbins, M. O. 1990 b Shear flow near solids: Epitaxial order and flow boundary conditions. Phys. Rev. A 41, 6830–6837.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thompson, P. A. & Troian, S. M. 1997 A general boundary condition for liquid flow at solid surfaces. Nature 389, 360–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yariv, E. 2004 Electro-osmotic flow near a surface charge discontinuity. J. Fluid Mech. 521, 181–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
You, D. & Moin, P. 2007 Effects of hydrophobic surfaces on the drag and lift of a circular cylinder. Phys. Fluids 19, 081701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhu, Y. & Granick, S. 2002 Limits of the hydrodynamics no-slip boundary condition. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 106102(4).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed