Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-hgkh8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-19T01:35:45.024Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The role of motor-sensory feedback in the evolution of mind

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 May 2008

Bruce Bridgeman
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, School of Social Sciences, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95064. bruceb@ucsc.eduhttp://people.ucsc.edu/~b ruceb/

Abstract

Seemingly small changes in brain organization can have revolutionary consequences for function. An example is evolution's application of the primate action-planning mechanism to the management of communicative sequences. When feedback from utterances reaches the brain again through a mechanism that evolved to monitor action sequences, it makes another pass through the brain, amplifying the human power of thinking.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright ©Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bickerton, D. (1984) The language bioprogram hypothesis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7:173221.Google Scholar
Bridgeman, B. (1986) Relations between the physiology of attention and the physiology of consciousness. Psychological Research 48:259–66.Google Scholar
Bridgeman, B. (1988) Consciousness and high-level control. In: The biology of behavior and mind, Ch. 14. Wiley.Google Scholar
Bridgeman, B. (1992) On the evolution of consciousness and language. Psycoloquy. 92. consciousness.1.bridgeman (electronic journal). Available at: http://psycprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/Google Scholar
Heckhausen, H. (1991) Motivation and action. Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Koehler, W. (1925/1959) The mentality of apes, 2nd edition, trans Winter, E.. Vintage Books/Harcourt, Brace. (Original work published in 1925).Google Scholar
Miller, G. A., Galanter, E. H. & Pribram, K. H. (1960) Plans and the structure of behavior. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Shallice, T. (1978) The dominant action system: An information-processing approach to consciousness. In: The flow of conscious experience, ed. Pope, K. & Singer, J. E.. Plenum.Google Scholar