Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T01:45:52.129Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

High concentrations of a passive scalar in turbulent dispersion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 May 2008

NILS MOLE ,
THOMAS P. SCHOPFLOCHER  and
PAUL J. SULLIVAN
NILS MOLE
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Sheffield, Hicks Building, Sheffield S3 7RH, UK
THOMAS P. SCHOPFLOCHER
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mathematics, The University of Western Ontario, London N6A 5B7, Ontario, Canada
PAUL J. SULLIVAN
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mathematics, The University of Western Ontario, London N6A 5B7, Ontario, Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In problems involving the dispersion of hazardous gases in the atmosphere, the distribution of high concentrations is often of particular interest. We address the modelling of the distribution of high concentrations of a dispersing passive scalar at large Péclet number, concentrating on the case of steady releases. We argue, from the physical character of the small-scale processes, and from the statistical theory of extreme values, that the high concentrations can be fitted well by a Generalized Pareto Distribution (GPD). This is supported by evidence from a range of experiments. We show, furthermore, that if this is the case then the ratios of successive high-order absolute moments of the scalar concentration are linearly related to the reciprocal of the order. The linear fit thus obtained allows the GPD parameters to be determined from the moments. In this way the moments can be used to deduce the properties of the high concentrations, in particular the maximum possible concentration θmax = θmax(x). We argue, on general physical grounds, that θmax/C0 (where C0 = C0(X) is the centreline mean concentration, and X is the downstream distance from the source) decreases to zero very far from the centreline, but that the decrease takes place on a length scale much larger than the mean plume width (because it is controlled by the relatively slowly acting molecular diffusion, rather than the fast turbulent advection). Thus, over the distances for which accurate measurements can be made, we expect θmax/C0 to be approximately constant throughout the plume cross-section. On the centreline, we argue that θmax/C0 increases downstream from the source, reaches a maximum and then decreases, ultimately tending to 1 far downstream. In support of these deductions we present results for some high-quality data for a steady line source in wind tunnel grid turbulence. Finally, we apply to this problem some existing models for the relationships between moments. By considering the behaviour far from the centreline in these models, and linking the moments to the high concentrations, we derive relationships between the model parameters. This allows us to derive an expression for θmax/C0 which depends on a total of 5 parameters, and (weakly) on C/C0 (where C = C(x) is the local mean concentration). Comparison with the data is encouraging. We also discuss possible methods for modelling the spatial variation of these 5 parameters.

Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 604 , 10 June 2008 , pp. 447 - 474
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anand, M. S. & Pope, S. B. 1985 Diffusion behind a line source in grid turbulence. In Turbulent Shear Flows 4 (ed. Bradbury, L. J. S. et al. ), pp. 46–61. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, C. W., Mole, N. & Nadarajah, S. 1997 A switching Poisson process model for high concentrations in short-range atmospheric dispersion. Atmos. Environ. 31, 813–824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batchelor, G. K. 1949 Diffusion in a field of homogeneous turbulence. Part I. Eulerian analysis. Austral. J. Sci. Res. 2, 437–450.Google Scholar
Batchelor, G. K. 1952 The effect of homogeneous turbulence on material lines and surfaces. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 213, 349–366.Google Scholar
Batchelor, G. K. 1959 Small-scale variation of convected quantities like temperature in turbulent fluid. Part 1. General discussion and the case of small conductivity. J. Fluid Mech. 5, 113–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buch, K. A. & Dahm, W. J. A. 1996 Experimental study of the fine scale structure of conserved scalar mixing in turbulent shear flows. Part 1. Sc ≫ 1. J. Fluid Mech. 317, 21–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buch, K. A. & Dahm, W. J. A. 1998 Experimental study of the fine-scale structure of conserved scalar mixing in turbulent shear flows. Part 2. Sc ≈ 1. J. Fluid Mech. 364, 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chatwin, P. C. & Robinson, C. 1997 The moments of the pdf of concentration for gas clouds in the presence of fences. Il Nuovo Cimento 20 C, 361–383.Google Scholar
Chatwin, P. C. & Sullivan, P. J. 1979 The relative diffusion of a cloud of passive contaminant in incompressible turbulent flow. J. Fluid Mech. 91, 337–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chatwin, P. C. & Sullivan, P. J. 1990 a A simple and unifying physical interpretation of scalar fluctuation measurements from many turbulent shear flows. J. Fluid Mech. 212 533–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chatwin, P. C. & Sullivan, P. J. 1990 b Cloud-average concentration statistics. Math. Computers Sim. 32 49–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, L. & Mole, N. 1995 Modelling the evolution of moments of contaminant concentration in turbulent flows. Environmetrics 6, 607–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Control of Substances Hazardous to Health Regulations 2002 Statutory Instrument 2002 No. 2677, HMSO.Google Scholar
Corriveau, A. F. & Baines, W. D. 1993 Diffusive mixing in turbulent jets as revealed by a pH indicator. Exps. Fluids 16, 129–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahm, W. J. A., Southerland, K. B. & Buch, K. A. 1991 Direct, high resolution, four-dimensional measurements of the fine scale structure of Sc ≫ 1 molecular mixing in turbulent flows. Phys. Fluids A 3, 1115–1127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, J. K. W. 1989 The application of box models in the analysis of toxic hazards by using the probit dose-response relationship. J. Haza. Mater. 22, 319–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derksen, R. W. & Sullivan, P. J. 1990 Moment approximations for probability density functions. Combust. Flame 81, 378–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, R. F. 1991 The use of probit expressions in the assessment of acute population impact of toxic releases. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 4, 49–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kristensen, L., Weil, J. C. & Wyngaard, J. C. 1989 Recurrence of high concentration values in a diffusing, fluctuating scalar field. Boundary-Layer Met. 47, 263–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labropulu, F. & Sullivan, P. J. 1995 Mean-square values of concentration in a contaminant cloud. Environmetrics 6, 619–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, D. M. & Chatwin, P. C. 1995 a The treatment of atmospheric dispersion data in the presence of noise and baseline drift. Boundary-Layer Met. 72 53–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, D. M. & Chatwin, P. C. 1995 b A new model PDF for contaminants dispersing in the atmosphere. Environmetrics 6 583–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, D. M. & Chatwin, P. C. 1997 A three-parameter PDF for the concentration of an atmospheric pollutant. J. Appl. Met. 36, 1064–1075.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, D. M., Chatwin, P. C. & Mole, N. 1997 Investigation of the collapse of the skewness and kurtosis exhibited in atmospheric dispersion data. Il Nuovo Cimento 20 C, 385–398.Google Scholar
Mole, N. 1995 The α-β model for concentration moments in turbulent flows. Environmetrics 6, 559–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mole, N. 2001 The large time behaviour in a model for concentration fluctuations in turbulent dispersion. Atmos. Environ. 35, 833–844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mole, N., Anderson, C. W., Nadarajah, S. & Wright, C. 1995 A generalized Pareto distribution model for high concentrations in short-range atmospheric dispersion. Environmetrics 6, 595–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mole, N. & Clarke, E. D. 1995 Relationships between higher moments of concentration and of dose in turbulent dispersion. Boundary-Layer Met. 73, 35–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moseley, D. J. 1991 A closure hypothesis for contaminant fluctuations in turbulent flow. MSc thesis, University of Western Ontario, London.Google Scholar
Munro, R. J., Chatwin, P. C. & Mole, N. 2001 The high concentration tails of the probability density function of a dispersing scalar in the atmosphere. Boundary-Layer Met. 98, 315–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munro, R. J., Chatwin, P. C. & Mole, N. 2003 a A concentration pdf for the relative dispersion of a contaminant plume in the atmosphere. Boundary-Layer Met. 106 411–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munro, R. J., Chatwin, P. C. & Mole, N. 2003 b Some simple statistical models for relative and absolute dispersion. Boundary-Layer Met. 107 253–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mylne, K. R. & Mason, P. J. 1991 Concentration fluctuation measurements in a dispersing plume at a range of up to 1000 m. Q. J. R. Met. Soc. 117, 177–206.Google Scholar
Pickands, J. 1975 Statistical inference using extreme order statistics. Ann. Statist. 3, 119–131.Google Scholar
Pope, S. B. 2000 Turbulent Flows. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sawford, B. L. 2004 Micro-mixing modelling of scalar fluctuations for plumes in homogeneous turbulence. Flow, Turb. and Combus. 72, 133–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sawford, B. L. & Sullivan, P. J. 1995 A simple representation of a developing contaminant concentration field. J. Fluid Mech. 289, 141–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sawford, B. L. & Tivendale, C. M. 1992 Measurements of concentration statistics downstream of a line source in grid turbulence. In Proc. 11th Australasian Fluid Mechanics Conf., Hobart, 14–18 Dec. 1992. University of Tasmania.Google Scholar
Schopflocher, T. P. 2001 An examination of the right-tail of the PDF of a diffusing scalar in a turbulent flow. Environmetrics 12, 131–145.3.0.CO;2-P>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schopflocher, T. P., Smith, C. J. & Sullivan, P. J. 2007 Scalar concentration reduction in a contaminant cloud. Boundary-Layer Met. 122, 683–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schopflocher, T. P. & Sullivan, P. J. 2002 A mixture model for the PDF of a diffusing scalar in a turbulent flow. Atmos. Environ. 36, 4405–4417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schopflocher, T. P. & Sullivan, P. J. 2005 The relationship between skewness and kurtosis of a diffusing scalar. Boundary-Layer Met. 115, 341–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stapountzis, H., Sawford, B. L., Hunt, J. C. R. & Britter, R. E. 1986 Structure of the temperature field downwind of a line source in grid turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 165, 401–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ten Berge, W. F., Zwart, A. & Appelman, L. M. 1986 Concentration-time mortality response relationship of irritant and systemically acting vapours and gases. J. Haza. Mater. 13, 301–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warhaft, Z. 1984 The interference of thermal fields from line sources in grid turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 144, 363–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ye, H. 1995 A new statistic for the contaminant dilution process in turbulent flows. PhD thesis, University of Western Ontario, London.Google Scholar
Xie, Z.-T., Hayden, P., Robins, A. G. & Voke, P. R. 2007 Modelling extreme concentrations from a source in a turbulent flow over a rough wall. Atmos. Environ. 41, 3395–3406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar