Environmental Conservation

Papers

Managing international ‘problem’ species: why pan-European cormorant management is so difficult

VIVIEN BEHRENSa1 c1, FELIX RAUSCHMAYERa1 and HEIDI WITTMERa1

a1 Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, PO Box 500 36, D-04301 Leipzig, Germany

SUMMARY

Stakeholder analysis as a specific tool in social science can be used to explain why environmental conflicts arise or persist and identify steps to resolve these. This paper considers the conflict over the great cormorant, a fish-foraging bird with a rapidly growing population, a conflict previously treated only at a local, subnational or national level. The measures taken have sometimes mitigated the conflict, but have not addressed the damage and conflicts owing to the rapid cormorant population expansion. As the population is mobile at the scale of Europe, management of the population needs to be considered at the European level. In the 1990s, the Convention on Migratory Species (CMS) drew up a management plan, which was never endorsed. Interviews with authorities, scientists and other stakeholders revealed they considered the CMS management plan inappropriate because some thought it compromised national autonomy while others thought there was insufficient cormorant protection. A possible step-wise solution to developing a pan-European management plan is proposed, requiring agreement on common objectives and strategies.

(Received November 24 2006)

(Accepted December 18 2007)

(Online publication March 06 2008)

Correspondence

c1 Correspondence: Ms Vivien Behrens Tel: +49 341 235 7745 e-mail: vivien.behrens@ufz.de