Visual Neuroscience


Reply to Johnson and Wright

David Philiponaa1 and J. Kevin O'Regana1

a1 Laboratoire Psychologie de la Perception, CNRS, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France

Johnson and Wright (hereafter J&W) claim, in their brief communication entitled “Reply to Philipona and O'Regan” that there are various difficulties in the reasoning in Philipona and O'Regan's (2006) paper entitled “Color naming, unique hues and hue cancellation predicted from singularities in reflection properties,” which was published in this journal in 2006. These difficulties supposedly prevent our paper's conclusions from being accepted.