Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T17:21:09.926Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Noun grammaticalization and determiner use in French children's speech: A gradual development with prosodic and lexical influences*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2008

DOMINIQUE BASSANO ,
ISABELLE MAILLOCHON  and
SYLVAIN MOTTET
DOMINIQUE BASSANO*
Affiliation:
Laboratoire Structures formelles du Langage, CNRS – UniversitéParis 8
ISABELLE MAILLOCHON
Affiliation:
Laboratoire Structures formelles du Langage, CNRS – UniversitéParis 8
SYLVAIN MOTTET
Affiliation:
Laboratoire Cognition et Comportement, CNRS – UniversitéParis 5
*
Address for correspondence: Dominique Bassano, Centre CNRS Pouchet, 59 rue Pouchet, 75849 Paris cedex 17, France. e-mail: dominique.bassano@sfl.cnrs.fr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study investigates when and how French-learning children acquire the main grammatical constraint on the noun category, i.e. the obligatory use of a preceding determiner. Spontaneous speech samples coming from the corpora of twenty children in each of three age groups, 1 ; 8, 2 ; 6, 3 ; 3, were transcribed and coded with respect to morphosyntactic, lexical and length properties of nouns. Results indicate that noun grammaticalization is a gradual process which involves early transitional procedures, as well as an increasing diversity in the content and contexts of determiner use. In support of prosodic hypotheses, noun length effects (in favor of monosyllabic nouns) mostly occurred at 1 ; 8. Animacy effects supporting the lexical hypothesis (in favor of inanimate nouns) occurred at 2 ; 6 and 3 ; 3. We suggest that noun grammaticalization is influenced by both prosodic and lexical factors. Prosodic influences predominate in the first steps of the developmental process, while lexical influences emerge in later steps.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 35 , Issue 2 , May 2008 , pp. 403 - 438
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

We are grateful to all the children and parents who took part in our study. We would also like to thank the students and collaborators who contributed to the data collection and transcription. Parts of the data were presented at the IASCL 2005 Congress (Berlin) and at the ELA 2005 Congress (Lyon).

References

REFERENCES

Allen, G. D. & Hawkins, S. (1980). Phonological rhythm: definition and development. In Yeni-Komshian, G. H., Kavanagh, J. F. & Ferguson, C. A. (eds), Child phonology Vol. I: Production, 227–56. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bassano, D. (2000). Early development of nouns and verbs in French: exploring the interface between the lexicon and grammar. Journal of Child Language 27(3), 521–59.Google Scholar
Bassano, D. & Eme, E. (2001). Development of noun determiner use in French children: lexical and grammatical bases. In Almgren, M., Barreña, A., Ezeizabarrena, M. J., Idiazabal, I. & MacWhinney, B. (eds), Research on child language acquisition. Proceedings of the 8th Conference of the International Association for the Study of Child Language, 1207–20. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Bassano, D., Eme, E. & Champaud, C. (2005). A naturalistic study of early lexical development: general processes and inter-individual variations in French children. First Language 25(1), 67–101.Google Scholar
Bassano, D., Laaha, S., Maillochon, I. & Dressler, W. U. (2004). Early acquisition of verb grammar and lexical development: evidence from periphrastic constructions in French and Austrian German. First Language 24(1), 33–70.Google Scholar
Bates, E., Dale, P. & Thal, D. (1995). Individual differences and their implications for theories of language development. In Fletcher, P. & MacWhinney, B. (eds), The handbook of child language, 96–151. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bates, E. & Goodman, J. C. (1999). On the emergence of grammar from the lexicon. In MacWhinney, B. (ed.), The emergence of language, 29–79. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Bottari, P., Cipriani, P. & Chilosi, A. M. (1993/94). Protosyntactic devices in the acquisition of Italian free morphology. Language Acquisition 3, 327–69.Google Scholar
Caselli, M. C., Casadio, P. & Bates, E. (1999). A comparison of the transition from first words to grammar in English and Italian. Journal of Child Language 26(1), 69–111.Google Scholar
Chierchia, G. (1998). Reference to kinds across languages. Natural Language Semantics 6, 339–405.Google Scholar
Demuth, K. (2001). Prosodic constraints on morphological development. In Weissenborn, J. & Höhle, B. (eds), Approaches to bootstrapping, Vol. II, 3–21. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Demuth, K. & Johnson, M. (2003). Truncation to subminimal words in early French. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 48, 211–41.Google Scholar
Demuth, K. & Tremblay, A. (2008). Prosodically-conditioned variability in children's production of French determiners. Journal of Child Language.Google Scholar
Devescovi, A., Caselli, M. C., Marchione, D., Pasqualetti, P., Reilly, J. & Bates, E. (2005). A crosslinguistic study of the relationship between grammar and lexical development. Journal of Child Language 32, 759–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deville, G. (1891). Notes sur le développement du langage II. Revue de linguistique et de philologie comparée 24, 10–42, 128–43, 242–57, 300–20.Google Scholar
Gentner, D. & Boroditsky, L. (2001). Individuation, relativity and early word learning. In Bowerman, M. & Levinson, S. (eds), Language acquisition and conceptual development, 215–56. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerken, L. A. (1994). A metrical template account of children's weak syllable omissions from multisyllabic words. Journal of Child Language 21, 565–84.Google Scholar
Gerken, L. A. & McIntosh, B. J. (1993). Interplay of function morphemes and prosody in early language. Developmental Psychology 29, 448–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerken, L. A., Wilson, R. & Lewis, W. (2005). Infants can use distributional cues to form syntactic categories. Journal of Child Language 32, 249–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Golinkoff, R. M., Hirsh-Pasek, K. & Schweisguth, M. A. (2001). A reappraisal of young children's knowledge of grammatical morphemes. In Weissenborn, J. & Höhle, B. (eds), Approaches to bootstrapping, Vol. I, 167–88. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Guasti, M. T., De Lange, J., Gavarro, A. & Caprin, C. (2004). Article omission: across child languages and across special registers. In van Kampen, J. & Baauw, S. (eds), Proceedings of GALA 2003, 199–210. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Höhle, B., Weissenborn, J., Kiefer, D., Schulz, A. & Schmitz, M. (2004). Functional elements in infants' speech processing: the role of determiners in the syntactic categorization of lexical elements. Infancy 5(3), 341–53.Google Scholar
Hulk, A. (2004). The acquisition of the French DP in a bilingual context. In Prévost, P. & Paradis, J. (eds), The acquisition of French in different contexts: focus on functional categories, 243–74. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1979). A functional approach to child language: a study of determiners and reference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kilani-Schoch, M. & Dressler, W. U. (2001). Filler+infinitive and pre- and proto-morphology demarcation in a French acquisition corpus. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 30, 653–85.Google Scholar
Kupisch, T. (2007). Testing the effects of frequency on the rate of learning: determiner use in early French, German and Italian. In Gülzow, I. & Gagarina, N. (eds), Frequency effects in language acquisition, 83–116. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kupisch, T., Müller, N. & Cantone, K. (2002). Gender in French and Italian: comparing Italian and French. Lingue e Linguaggio 1, 107–49.Google Scholar
Lleó, C. (2001). The interface of phonology and syntax: the emergence of the article in the early acquisition of Spanish and German. In Weissenborn, J. & Höhle, B. (eds), Approaches to bootstrapping, Vol. II, 23–44. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Lleó, C. & Demuth, K. (1999). Prosodic constraints on the emergence of grammatical morphemes: cross-linguistic evidence from Germanic and Romance languages. In Greenhill, A., Littlefield, H. & Tano, C. (eds). Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Boston University Conference on Child Language Development, 407–18. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES project: tools for analysing talk. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Marchman, V. & Bates, E. (1994). Continuity in lexical and morphological development: a test of the critical mass hypothesis. Journal of Child Language 21, 339–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nazzi, T., Iakimova, G., Bertoncini, J., Frédonie, S. & Alcantara, C. (2006). Early segmentation of fluent speech by infants acquiring French: emerging evidence for crosslinguistic differences. Journal of Memory and Language 54(3), 283–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, A. (2001). Filler syllables: what is their status in emerging grammar? Journal of Child Language 28, 229–42.Google Scholar
Peters, A. & Menn, L. (1993). False starts and filler-syllables: ways to learn grammatical morphemes. Language 69, 742–77.Google Scholar
Pine, J. M. & Lieven, E. (1997). Slot and frames patterns and the development of the determiner category. Applied Psycholinguistics 18(2), 123–38.Google Scholar
Pine, J. M. & Martindale, H. (1996). Syntactic categories in the speech of young children: the case of the determiner. Journal of Child Language 23, 369–95.Google Scholar
Salazar Orvig, A., Hassan, R., Leber-Marin, J., Marcos, H., Morgenstern, A. & Parès, J. (2005). Can first determiners be considered plurifunctional? A longitudinal and cross-sectional study on French children. Abstracts of the X International Congress for the Study of Child Language, Berlin, July 25–29, 195.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2000). Do young children have adult syntactic competence? Cognition 74, 209–53.Google Scholar
Valian, V. (1986). Syntactic categories in the speech of young children. Developmental Psychology 22(4), 562–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van der Velde, M. (2004). L'acquisition des articles définis en L1: une étude comparative entre le français et le néerlandais. Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Étrangère 21, 9–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veneziano, E. & Sinclair, H. (2000). The changing status of ‘filler syllables’ on the way to grammatical morphemes. Journal of Child Language 27(3), 461–500.Google Scholar
Vihman, M. M., DePaolis, R. A. & Davis, B. L. (1998). Is there a ‘trochaic bias’ in early word learning? Evidence from English and French. Child Development 69, 935–49.Google Scholar
Wijnen, F., Krikhaar, E. & den Os, E. (1994). The (non)realization of unstressed elements in children's utterances: evidence for a rhythmic constraint. Journal of Child Language 21, 59–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed