Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-hgkh8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T18:42:14.649Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Dakota Effect

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

Garry Young
Affiliation:
The George Washington University
Lee Sigelman
Affiliation:
The George Washington University

Extract

If challenged to do so, relatively few Americans could probably find North and South Dakota on a map, let alone correctly name, spell, and pronounce the capitals of the two states. Nor would they be able to recall anything interesting about the Dakotas, whose main tourist attractions, besides Mount Rushmore, are a drug store, a civic arena festooned in corn, and a peace garden. Although one of the Dakotas bills itself as “The Land of Infinite Variety,” its sociocultural diversity consists primarily of different synods of Lutherans who engage in endless disputation with one another because they are so similar. Dakotans prefer their food bland—they consider ketchup daringly spicy—and their politicians low-key. When they encounter something new, they call it “different,” which they rarely mean as a compliment, and they wait for it to go away—which, because there is so little to hold it in the Dakotas, it probably will do. They keep their opinions to themselves (a typical Dakotan being the fellow from Sioux Falls who loved his wife so much that he almost told her), and they do not like it when people make a fuss about themselves or anything else. Thus, when South Dakotans perceived the previously popular Senator George McGovern as having gotten too big for his britches by seeking the presidency in 1972, they saw to it that he would fail to carry his home state, and three decades later they voted long-time Senator Tom Daschle out of office as soon as he repeated McGovern's mistake of seeing a president whenever he gazed into a mirror.

Type
FEATURES
Copyright
© 2008 The American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Balla, Steven, Eric Lawrence, Forrest Maltzman, and Lee Sigelman. 2002. “Partisanship, Blame Avoidance, and the Distribution of Legislative Pork.” American Journal of Political Science 46 (July): 51525.Google Scholar
Coen, Joel, and Ethan Coen. 1996. Fargo. Gramercy Pictures.Google Scholar
Glover, Mike, and David Pitt. 2005. “Broad Skepticism About Under-30 Tax Break.” The Associated Press State & Local Wire, January 25.Google Scholar
Lee, Frances, and Bruce Oppenheimer. 1999. Sizing Up the Senate. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Matthews, Donald R. 1968. “United States Senators: A Collective Portrait.” In American Legislative Behavior: A Reader, ed. Samuel C. Patterson. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand, 62034.Google Scholar
Morris, Edmund. 1979. The Rise of Theodore Roosevelt. New York: Coward, McCann & Geoghegan.Google Scholar
Nutting, Brian, and H. Amy Stern, eds. 2001. Politics in America. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Rieselbach, Leroy N. 1970. “Congressmen as ‘Small Town Boys’: A Research Note.” Midwest Journal of Political Science 14 (May): 32130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spillman, W.J. 1909. “The Country Boy Again.” Science 29 (May 7): 73941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarantino, Quentin. 2004. Kill Bill: Vol. 2. Miramax Films.Google Scholar
Wilson, Michael. 2005. “Alive and Thriving in the Midwest: Brawling in Cages.” New York Times, July 28.Google Scholar