Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T05:24:36.435Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

t-to-r in West Yorkshire English1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2008

JUDITH M. BROADBENT
JUDITH M. BROADBENT*
Affiliation:
English Language and Linguistics, Roehampton University, Roehampton Lane, London SW15 5PH, UKjudith.broadbent@roehampton.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article investigates t-to-r in West Yorkshire (WY) English and traces its course from a productive process in the nineteenth century to a lexically restricted fossil in contemporary WY. Nineteenth-century sources suggest that by the end of that century this process was already in decline. During the course of the twentieth century t-glottalling became a feature of the variety and so this article explores the possibility that as the frequency of use of t-glottalling increased, this would quickly overshadow t-to-r usage. Paradoxically, frequency of use is also responsible for the t-to-r phenomenon manifested today. More specifically, t-to-r remains in a small group of frequent words which are related by phonological shape. As a consequence of their frequency and shape, they have lexical strength and this is why a t-to-r fossil is maintained in WY today.

Type
Research Article
Information
English Language & Linguistics , Volume 12 , Issue 1 , March 2008 , pp. 141 - 168
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andrésen, Bjørn S. 1968. Pre-glottalisation in English standard pronunciation. Oslo: Norwegian University Press.Google Scholar
Blair, David & Collins, Peter (eds.). 2001. English in Australia. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blevins, Juliette. 2004. Evolutionary phonology: The emergence of sound patterns. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broadbent, Judith M. in prep. West Yorkshire phonology. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan. 2001. Phonology and language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan. 2002a. Phonological evidence for exemplar storage of multiword sequences. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 215–21.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan. 2002b. Word frequency and context of use in the lexical diffusion of phonetically conditioned sound change. Language Variation and Change 14, 261–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan. 2003. Lexical diffusion and regular sound change. In Restle & Zaefferer (eds.), 58–74.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan. 2006. From usage to grammar: The mind's response to repetition. Language 82 (4), 711–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan & Hopper, Paul (eds.). 2001. Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carr, Philip. 1991. Lexical properties of postlexical rules: Postlexical derived environments and the elsewhere condition. Lingua 85, 255–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collin, Beverley & Mees, Inger M.. 1996. How recent a phenomenon is glottalisation in RP? English World-Wide 17 (2), 175–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Docherty, Gerard J., Foulkes, Paul, Milroy, Jim, Milroy, Lesley & Walshaw, David. 1997. Descriptive adequacy in phonology: A variationist perspective. Journal of Linguistics 33, 275–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, Alexander J. 1889. On early English pronunciation, part V: The existing phonology of English dialects compared with that of West Saxon speech. London: Trːbner & Co.Google Scholar
Harris, John. 1994. English sound structure. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Harris, John & Kaye, Jonathan. 1990. A tale of two cities: London glottalling and New York City tapping. The Linguistic Review 7, 251–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 2006. Against markedness (and what to replace it with). Journal of Linguistics 42 (1), 25–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, Bruce, Kirchner, Robert & Steriade, Donca (eds.). 2004. Phonetically based phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honeybone, Patrick. 2001. Lenition inhibition in Liverpool English. English Language and Linguistics 5, 213–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, Elizabeth. 2004. Deconstructing markedness. Berkeley Linguistics Society 30.Google Scholar
Jones, Mark J. 2002. The origin of definite article reduction in northern English dialects: Evidence from dialect allomorphy. English Language and Linguistics 6 (2), 325–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, Daniel. 1976. Syllable-based generalisations in English phonology. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Kirchner, Robert. 1998. An effort-based approach to consonant lenition. PhD dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles, ROA 276, http://roa.rutgers.eduGoogle Scholar
Kirchner, Robert. 2004. Consonant lenition. In Hayes, Kirchner & Steriade (eds.), 313–45.Google Scholar
Krämer, Martin. 2006. Italian palatalisation: Into the phonology or into the lexicon? Presented at the 14th Manchester Phonology Meeting.Google Scholar
Leslie, David. 1983. Left capture and British voiceless stop allophony. MS.Google Scholar
Leslie, David. 1989. Lenition systems. Presented at the London Phonology Seminar, SOAS.Google Scholar
Lodge, Ken. R. 1984. Studies in the phonology of colloquial English. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
McClelland, James L. & Rumelhart, David E. (eds.). 1986. Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pater, Joe. 2005. Non-uniformity in English secondary stress: The role of ranked and lexically specific constraints. Phonology 17 (2), 237–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petyt, K. M. 1978. Secondary contraction in West Yorkshire negatives. In Trudgill (ed.), 91–100.Google Scholar
Petyt, K. M. 1985. Dialect and accent in industrial West Yorkshire. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet. 2001a. Stochastic phonology. GLOT International 5 (6), 195–207.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet. 2001b. Exemplar dynamics: Word frequency, lenition and contrast. In Bybee & Hopper (eds.), 137–57.Google Scholar
Restle, David & Zaefferer, Dietmar (eds.). 2003. Sounds and systems: Studies in structure and change. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Rumelhart, David E. & McClelland, James L.. 1986. On learning the past tense of English verbs: Implicit rules or parallel distributed processing? In McClelland & Rumelhart (eds.), 216–71.Google Scholar
Sangster, Catherine M. 2001. Lenition of alveolar stops in Liverpool English. Journal of Sociolinguistics 5 (3), 401–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, Anthea E. 1992. Sound change in progress: A study of phonological change and lexical diffusion, with reference to glottalisation and r-loss in the speech of some Exeter school children. Exeter Linguistics Studies 17. University of Exeter Press.Google Scholar
Tollfree, Laura. 2001. Variation and change in Australian English consonants: reduction of /t/. In Blair & Collins (eds.), 45–67.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 1974. The social differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter (ed). 1978. Sociolinguistic patterns. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Watson, Kevin. 2002. The realisation of final /t/ in Liverpool English. Durham Working Papers in Linguistics 8, 195–205.Google Scholar
Wells, John C. 1982. Accents of English, vol. 2: The British Isles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, Elisabeth M. 1934. The story of Joseph Wright: Man and scholar. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wright, Joseph. 1892. A grammar of the dialect of Windhill in the West Riding of Yorkshire. London: English Dialect Society.Google Scholar
Wright, Joseph. 1905. The English dialect grammar. Oxford: Frowde.Google Scholar