Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-p566r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T09:57:04.740Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The parasexual cycle in Verticillium albo-atrum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

A. C. Hastie
Affiliation:
Botany Department, University of St. Andrews, Queen's College, Dundee
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Genetic recombination through the parasexual cycle, or some very similar system, was demonstrated. Diploid strains were very unstable, yielding about 95% haploid conidia from three-week-old cultures This high frequency of haploid segregants was at least partly attributable to greater sporulation of haploid mycelium, but may also reflect a higher frequency of haploidization than that found in Aspergillus nidulans.

Mitotic crossing-over also occurred frequently, and gave segregants homozygous for some markers but heterozygous for others. It was also detectable by changes in the phase of linked markers occurring during vegetative growth. Some heterozygous segregants were either aneuploids, or were formed by double mitotic crossovers.

Haploid segregants, derived from nuclei which had previously undergone mitotic crossing-over, were often recovered. This coincidence of mitotic crossing-over and haploidization in one nuclear lineage, together with the probable occurrence of double mitotic crossovers, makes mitotic analysis less clear cut than in Aspergillus nidulans.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1964

References

REFERENCES

Buxton, E. W. & Hastie, A. C. (1962). Spontaneous and ultra-violet irradiation-induced mutants of Verticillium albo-atrum. J. gen. Microbiol. 28, 625632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hastie, A. C. (1961). Cultural and pathogenic variability in the hop-wilt fungus Verticillium, albo-atrum. Ph.D. Thesis, University of London.Google Scholar
Hastie, A. C. (1962). Genetic recombination in the hop-wilt fungus Verticillium albo-atrum. J. gen. Microbiol. 27, 373382.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kafer, Etta (1961). The processes of spontaneous recombination in the vegetative nuclei of Aspergillus nidulans. Genetics, 46, 15811609.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pontecorvo, G. (1956). The parasexual cycle in fungi. Ann. Rev. Microbiol. 10, 393400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pontecorvo, G. (1959). Trends in Genetic Analysis. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pontecorvo, G., Tarr-Gloor, E. & Forbes, E. (1954). Analysis of mitotic recombination in Aspergillus nidulans. J. Genet. 52, 226237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roper, J. A. (1952). Production of heterozygous diploids in filamentous fungi. Experimentia, 8, 1415.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roper, J. A. & Pritchard, R. H. (1955). The recovery of the complementary products of mitotic crossing over. Nature, Lond., 175, 639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, C. (1936). Somatic crossing over and segregation in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics, 21, 625730.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Talboys, P. W. (1960). A culture medium aiding the identification of Verticillium albo-atrum and V. dahliae. Plant Path. 9, 57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuveson, R. W. & Coy, D. O. (1961). Heterokaryosis and somatic recombination in Cephalo- sporium mycophilum. Mycologia, 53, 244253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar