Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T13:03:07.025Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Does ICP monitoring make a difference in neurocritical care?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2008

O. L. Cremer
O. L. Cremer*
Affiliation:
University Medical Center, Department of Intensive Care, Utrecht, The Netherlands
*
Correspondence to: Olaf L. Cremer, Department of Intensive Care, University Medical Center Q04.2.313, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands. E-mails: o.l.cremer@umcutrecht.nl, o.l.cremer@planet.nl; Tel: +31 87553261; Fax: +31 887555032
Get access

Summary

Raised intracranial pressure and low cerebral perfusion pressure are associated with ischaemia and poor outcome after brain injury. Therefore, many management protocols target these variables. However, there are no randomized controlled trials that have demonstrated the effectiveness of intracranial pressure-guided care in severely head-injured patients. Observational studies of such therapy have yielded inconsistent results, ranging from decreased mortality to no effect or increased morbidity or mortality. A recent cohort study supports the notion that the possible benefits of intracranial pressure monitoring after traumatic brain injury are small – if present – and would exceed a number needed for the treatment of 16. Furthermore, intracranial pressure monitoring and aggressive management of intracranial pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure have been associated with increased lengths of stay in the neurocritical care unit, conceivable costs and possibly an increased rate of complications. Against this background, there is sufficient clinical equipoise to warrant an adequately powered randomized controlled trial to compare intracranial pressure-guided care with supportive critical care without intracranial pressure monitoring in patients with severe traumatic brain injury. However, the realization of such a trial is likely to be problematic for a number of reasons, not least of which the firmly held biases of many clinicians.

Keywords

HEAD INJURYINTRACRANIAL PRESSURE MONITORINGBLOOD PRESSURE, intracerebralOUTCOME
Type
Original Article
Information
European Journal of Anaesthesiology , Volume 25 , Issue S42 , February 2008 , pp. 87 - 93
Copyright
Copyright © European Society of Anaesthesiology 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Freeman, R. Intrapartum fetal monitoring – a disappointing story. N Engl J Med 1990; 322: 624–626.Google Scholar
2.Natale, R, Dodman, N. Birth can be a hazardous journey: electronic fetal monitoring does not help. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2003; 25: 1007–1009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Sandham, JD, Hull, RD, Brant, RF et al. . A randomized, controlled trial of the use of pulmonary-artery catheters in high-risk surgical patients. N Engl J Med 2003; 348: 5–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Wheeler, AP, Bernard, GR, Thompson, BT et al. . Pulmonary-artery versus central venous catheter to guide treatment of acute lung injury. N Engl J Med 2006; 354: 2213–2224.Google Scholar
5.Odetola, FO, Tilford, JM, Davis, MM. Variation in the use of intracranial-pressure monitoring and mortality in critically ill children with meningitis in the United States. Pediatrics 2006; 117: 1893–1900.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Cremer, OL, Van Dijk, GW, van Wensen, E et al. . Effect of intracranial pressure monitoring and targeted intensive care on functional outcome after severe head injury. Crit Care Med 2005; 33: 2207–2213.Google Scholar
7.Brain Trauma Foundation. The American Association of Neurological Surgeons. The Joint Section on Neurotrauma and Critical Care. Indications for intracranial pressure monitoring. J Neurotrauma 2000; 17: 479–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Narayan, RK, Kishore, PR, Becker, DP et al. . Intracranial pressure: to monitor or not to monitor? A review of our experience with severe head injury. J Neurosurg 1982; 56: 650–659.Google Scholar
9.Lee, TT, Galarza, M, Villanueva, PA. Diffuse axonal injury (DAI) is not associated with elevated intracranial pressure (ICP). Acta Neurochir 1998; 140: 41–46.Google Scholar
10.Wilkins, IA, Menon, DK, Matta, BF. Management of comatose head-injured patients: are we getting any better? Anaesthesia 2001; 56: 350–352.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Sahjpaul, R, Girotti, M. Intracranial pressure monitoring in severe traumatic brain injury – results of a Canadian survey. Can J Neurol Sci 2000; 27: 143–147.Google Scholar
12.Kornecki, A, Constantini, S, Adani, LB et al. . Survey of critical care management of severe traumatic head injury in Israel. Childs Nerv Syst 2002; 18: 375–379.Google ScholarPubMed
13.McKeating, EG, Andrews, PJ, Tocher, JI, Menon, DK. The intensive care of severe head injury: a survey of non-neurosurgical centres in the United Kingdom. Br J Neurosurg 1998; 12: 7–14.Google Scholar
14.Shigemori, M, Tokutomi, T. Result of nationwide survey of the management of severe head injury in Japan. Neurol Res 2002; 24: 41–44.Google Scholar
15.Martinez-Manas, RM, Santamarta, D, de Campos, JM, Ferrer, E. Camino intracranial pressure monitor: prospective study of accuracy and complications. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2000; 69: 82–86.Google Scholar
16.Blaha, M, Lazar, D, Winn, RH, Ghatan, S. Hemorrhagic complications of intracranial pressure monitors in children. Pediatr Neurosurg 2003; 39: 27–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17.Blaha, M, Lazar, D. Traumatic brain injury and haemorrhagic complications after intracranial pressure monitoring. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2005; 76: 147.Google Scholar
18.Stocchetti, N, Penny, KI, Dearden, M et al. . Intensive care management of head-injured patients in Europe: a survey from the European brain injury consortium. Intensive Care Med 2001; 27: 400–406.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19.Bekar, A, Goren, S, Korfali, E, Aksoy, K, Boyaci, S. Complications of brain tissue pressure monitoring with a fiberoptic device. Neurosurg Rev 1998; 21: 254–259.Google Scholar
20.Aucoin, PJ, Kotilainen, HR, Gantz, NM et al. . Intracranial pressure monitors. Epidemiologic study of risk factors and infections. Am J Med 1986; 80: 369–376.Google Scholar
21.Mayhall, CG, Archer, NH, Lamb, VA et al. . Ventriculostomy-related infections. A prospective epidemiologic study. N Engl J Med 1984; 310: 553–559.Google Scholar
22.Crockard, HA, Hanlon, K, Ganz, E, Duda, EE. Intracranial pressure gradients in a patient with a thalamic tumor. Surg Neurol 1976; 5: 151–155.Google Scholar
23.Miller, JD, Peeler, DF, Pattisapu, J, Parent, AD. Supratentorial pressures. Part I: differential intracranial pressures. Neurol Res 1987; 9: 193–197.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24.Mindermann, T, Reinhardt, H, Gratzl, O. Significant lateralisation of supratentorial ICP after blunt head trauma. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1992; 116: 60–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25.Sahuquillo, J, Poca, MA, Arribas, M, Garnacho, A, Rubio, E. Interhemispheric supratentorial intracranial pressure gradients in head-injured patients: are they clinically important? J Neurosurg 1999; 90: 16–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26.Gelabert-Gonzalez, M, Ginesta-Galan, V, Sernamito-Garcia, R et al. . The Camino intracranial pressure device in clinical practice. Assessment in a 1000 cases. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2006; 148: 435–441.Google Scholar
27.Vincent, JL, Berre, J. Primer on medical management of severe brain injury. Crit Care Med 2005; 33: 1392–1399.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28.Unterberg, AW, Stover, J, Kress, B, Kiening, KL. Edema and brain trauma. Neuroscience 2004; 129: 1021–1029.Google Scholar
29.Rosner, MJ, Rosner, SD, Johnson, AH. Cerebral perfusion pressure: management protocol and clinical results. J Neurosurg 1995; 83: 949–962.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
30.Eker, C, Asgeirsson, B, Grände, PO, Schalen, W, Nordström, CH. Improved outcome after severe head injury with a new therapy based on principles for brain volume regulation and preserved microcirculation. Crit Care Med 1998; 26: 1881–1886.Google Scholar
31. Brain Trauma Foundation. Update notice 5–1–2003. Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury: cerebral perfusion pressure. Available at: http://www2.braintrauma.org/guidelines/. Accessed: 11–1–2006.Google Scholar
32. Brain Trauma Foundation, 2000. Management and prognosis of severe traumatic brain injury. Available at: http://www2.braintrauma.org/guidelines/. Accessed: 11–1–2006.Google Scholar
33.Jennett, B, Teasdale, G, Galbraith, S et al. . Severe head injuries in three countries. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1977; 40: 291–298.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
34.Lane, PL, Skoretz, TG, Doig, G, Girotti, MJ. Intracranial pressure monitoring and outcomes after traumatic brain injury. Can J Surg 2000; 43: 442–448.Google Scholar
35.Gelpke, GJ, Braakman, R, Habbema, JD, Hilden, J. Comparison of outcome in two series of patients with severe head injuries. J Neurosurg 1983; 59: 745–750.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
36.Patel, HC, Menon, DK, Tebbs, S et al. . Specialist neurocritical care and outcome from head injury. Intensive Care Med 2002; 28: 547–553.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
37.Bulger, EM, Nathens, AB, Rivara, FP et al. . Management of severe head injury: institutional variations in care and effect on outcome. Crit Care Med 2002; 30: 1870–1876.Google Scholar
38.Murray, LS, Teasdale, GM, Murray, GD et al. . Head injuries in four British neurosurgical centres. Br J Neurosurg 1999; 13: 564–569.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
39.Steiner, LA, Coles, JP, Johnston, AJ et al. . Responses of posttraumatic pericontusional cerebral blood flow and blood volume to an increase in cerebral perfusion pressure. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2003; 23: 1371–1377.Google Scholar
40.Grände, PO, Asgeirsson, B, Nordström, CH. Physiologic principles for volume regulation of a tissue enclosed in a rigid shell with application to the injured brain. J Trauma 1997; 42: 23–31.Google Scholar
41.Contant, CF, Valadka, AB, Gopinath, SP, Hannay, HJ, Robertson, CS. Adult respiratory distress syndrome: a complication of induced hypertension after severe head injury. J Neurosurg 2001; 95: 560–568.Google Scholar
42.Cremer, OL, Moons, KG, Bouman, EA et al. . Long-term propofol infusion and cardiac failure in adult head-injured patients. Lancet 2001; 357: 117–118.Google Scholar
43.Roberts, I, Schierhout, G, Alderson, P. Absence of evidence for the effectiveness of five interventions routinely used in the intensive care management of severe head injury: a systematic review. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1998; 65: 729–733.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
44.Muizelaar, JP, Marmarou, A, Ward, JD et al. . Adverse effects of prolonged hyperventilation in patients with severe head injury: a randomized clinical trial. J Neurosurg 1991; 75: 731–739.Google Scholar
45.Clifton, GL, Miller, ER, Choi, SC et al. . Lack of effect of induction of hypothermia after acute brain injury. N Engl J Med 2001; 344: 556–563.Google Scholar
46.Robertson, CS, Valadka, AB, Hannay, HJ et al. . Prevention of secondary ischemic insults after severe head injury. Crit Care Med 1999; 27: 2086–2095.Google Scholar
47.Brain Trauma Foundation. The American Association of Neurological Surgeons. The Joint Section on Neurotrauma and Critical Care. Guidelines for the management of severe head injury. J Neurotrauma 1996; 13: 641–734.Google Scholar
48.Doppenberg, EM, Choi, SC, Bullock, R. Clinical trials in traumatic brain injury: lessons for the future. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 2004; 16: 87–94.Google Scholar
49.Maas, AI, Marmarou, A, Murray, GD, Steyerberg, EW. Clinical trials in traumatic brain injury: current problems and future solutions. Acta Neurochir Suppl 2004; 89: 113–118.Google Scholar
50.Cremer, OL, Moons, KG, Van Dijk, GW, van Balen, P, Kalkman, CJ. Prognosis following severe head injury: development and validation of a model for prediction of death, disability, and functional recovery. J Trauma 2006; 61: 1484–1491.Google Scholar