Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T13:14:39.115Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On a New Bothriocephalus and a New Genus of Proteocephalidae from Indian Fresh-water Fishes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

W. N. F. Woodland
Affiliation:
Wellcome Bureau of Scientific Research, Endsleigh Gardens, London, N.W. 1.

Extract

1. A new species of Bothriocephalus—B. pycnomerus—is described from the intestine of Ophiocephalus marulius Ham. Buch., from the Ganges and Jumna at Allahabad, India.

2. B. pycnomerus closely resembles B. histiophorus (Shipley 1901; from the marine sword-fish Histiophorus) in structure but differs chiefly in the possession of an armed scolex and its crowded indistinct segmentation.

3. Lühe's definition of the genus Bothriocephalus must be amended to include forms with armed scolices and forms in which the ventral uterine apertures are a-median and irregularly alternate.

4. Two new species of Proteocephalidae are described which possess armed muscular rostella, and for these a new genus Gangesia is created and defined. The definitions of the Order Tetraphyllidea (Lühe 1910) and of the Family Proteocephalidae (La Rue 1914) must be amended to include forms possessing muscular rostella, armed or unarmed.

5. These two new species—Gangesia wallago and G. macrones—were found in the intestines of Wallago attu Bleek and Macrones seenghala Sykes (both Siluroids) respectively, from the Ganges and Jumna at Allahabad.

6. Southwell's “Ophryocotyle bengalensis,” from Ophiocephalus striatus, Labeo rohita and Wallago attu, is probably identical with Gangesia wallago.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1924

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Beddard, F. E. (1913). Contributions to the Anatomy and Systematic Arrangement of the Cestoidea. VII, On Six Species of Tapeworms from Reptiles, belonging to the Genus Ichthyotaenia (s. 1). Proc. Zool. Soc. London, p. 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
La Rue, G. R. (1911). A Revision of the Cestode Family Proteocephalidae. Zool. Anzeig. xxxviii. 473.Google Scholar
La Rue, G. R. (1914). A Revision of the Cestode Family Proteocephalidae. Illinois Biological Monographs (Univ. of Illinois, Urbana), Vol. i.Google Scholar
Lühe, M. (1899). Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Bothriocephaliden. Centralbl. Bakt. u. Parasit. xxvi. 702.Google Scholar
Lühe, M. (1910). Parasitische Plattwürmer. II: Cestodes. In Brauer's Die Süsswasserfauna Deutchlands, Heft 18.Google Scholar
Shipley, A. E. (1901). On a new Species of Bothriocephalus. Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. xi. 209.Google Scholar
Southwell, T. (1913 a). Notes from the Bengal Fisheries Laboratory, Indian Museum. No. 1. Rec. Indian Mus. ix. 79.Google Scholar
Southwell, T. (1913 b). On some Indian Cestoda. Part I. Rec. Indian Mus. ix. 279.Google Scholar
Southwell, T. (1915 a). Notes from the Bengal Fisheries Laboratory, Indian Museum. No. 2. On some Indian Parasites of Fish, etc. Rec. Indian Mus. xi. 326.Google Scholar
Southwell, T. (1915 b). Notes from the Bengal Fisheries Laboratory, Indian Museum. No. 3. On Helminths from Fish and Aquatic Birds in the Chilka Lake. Rec. Indian Mus. xi. 331.Google Scholar
Woodland, W. N. F. (1923). On some remarkable new Forms of Caryophyllaeidae from the Anglo-Egyptian Sudan, and a Revision of the Families of the Cestodaria. Quart. Journ. Micr. Sci. lxvii. Part III, p. 435.Google Scholar
Woodland, W. N. F. (1924). On a new Species of the Cestodarian Genus Caryophyllaeus from an Egyptian Siluroid. Proc. Zool. Soc. London, Part 2, p. 529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar