Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T23:30:45.635Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies on the Intestinal Protozoa found in the Termites of Japan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Makoto Koidzumi
Makoto Koidzumi
Affiliation:
(From the Government Institute of Science, Formosa, and the National Institute for Medical Research, London.)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The protozoa found in the intestines of termites constitute one of the most interesting but less illuminated fields in protozoology. The amount of work done by a number of authors in several different parts of the world is, however, already fairly large, especially valuable papers having appeared in recent years, so that some light has been thrown on the field. Nevertheless, important questions regarding morphology, physiology, systematics, etc., still remain either insufficiently studied or almost untouched. Having myself been occupied for some years past with these interesting organisms, harboured by three species of termites in Japan proper and Formosa, and having made observations which seem to be of some interest, I propose in this paper to describe the chief results of my studies.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 13 , Issue 3 , August 1921 , pp. 235 - 309
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1921

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Bugnion, E. (1912). Observations sur les Termites. Différenciation des castes. C. R. Soc. Biol. lxxii. 1091.Google Scholar
Bugnion, E. (1913). La différenciation des castes chez les Termites [Nevr.]. Bull. Soc. Entomol. France, p. 213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bugnion, E. and Ferrière, C. (1911). L'imago du Coptotermes flavus. Larves portant des rudiments d'ailes prothoraciques. Mém. Soc. Zool. France, xxiv. 97.Google Scholar
Bugnion, E. and Popoff, N. (1910). Le termite à latex de Ceylan, Coptotermes travians Haviland. Mém. Soc. Zool. France xxiii. 105.Google Scholar
Bugnion, E. and Popoff, N. (1910 a).Les Calotermes de Ceylan. Mém. Soc. Zool. France xxiii. 124.Google Scholar
Buscalioni, L. and Comes, S. (1910). La digestione delle membrane vegetali per opera dei Flagellati contenuti nell' intestine dei Termitidi e il problema della simbiosi. Atti Accad. Gioenia Sci. Nat. Catania, Ser. 5, Vol. iii. Mem. XVII. 1.Google Scholar
Buttel-Reepen, H. V. (1914). Wissenschaftliche Ergebnisse einer Forschungsreise nach Ostasien. III. Termiten aus Sumatra, Java, Malacca und Ceylon [von Nils Holmgren]. Vorwort. Zool. Jahrb. (Syst. Abt.) xxxvi. 229.Google Scholar
Comes, S. (1910). Lophophora vacuolata (Comes) nuovo genere e nuova specie di flagellato dell' intestino dei Termitidi. Boll. Accad. Gioenia Sci. Nat. Catania, (Ser. 2) Fasc. 13, P. 11Google Scholar
Comes, S. (1910 a). Alcune considerazioni citologiche a proposito del dimorfismo sessuale riscontrato in Dinenympha gracilis Leidy. (Nota prelim.) Boll. Accad. Gioenia Sci. Nat. Catania p. 20.Google Scholar
Comes, S. (1912). Fenomeni nueleari e fasi riproduttive in Pyrsonympha flagellata Grassi. (Nota prelim.) Boll. Accad. Gioenia Sci. Nat. Catania (Ser. 2) Fasc. 20 and 21, p. 6.Google Scholar
Comes, S. (1912 a). Riproduzione e morfologia di Dinenympha, gracilis Leidy flagellato ospite dell' intestino dei Termitidi. Arch. f. Protistenk. xxv. 275.Google Scholar
Comes, S. (1914). Notizie sulla morfologia e riproduzione di Monocercomonas termitis. Boll. Accad. Gioenia Sci. Nat. Catania, (Ser. 2) Fase. 33, p. 15.Google Scholar
Cutler, D. W. (1919). Observations on the Protozoa parasitic in the hind gut of Archotermopsis wroughtoni Desn. Part I. Ditrichomonas (Trichomonas) termitis Imms. Quart. Journ. Micro. Sci. lxiii. 555.Google Scholar
Cutler, D. W. (1920). Protozoa parasitic in Termites. Part II. Joenopsis polytricha n. gen., n. sp., with brief notes on two new species, Joenopsis cephalotricha and Microjoenia axostylis. Quart. Journ. Micro. Sci. lxiv. 383.Google Scholar
Dobell, C. C. (1910). On some parasitic protozoa from Ceylon. Spolia Zeylanica, vii. 65.Google Scholar
Dogiel, V. (1916). Researches on the parasitic protozoa from the intestine of termites. [Russian and English.] I. Tetramitidae. Journ. russe de Zool. (Petrograd), i. 1.Google Scholar
Foà, A. (1904). Ricerche sulla riproduzione dei Flagellati. II. Processo di divisione delle Triconinfe. (Nota prelim.) Atti R. Accad. Lincei, (5 Ser.) Rendiconti, xiii. (2 Sem.) p. 618.Google Scholar
Foà, A. (1905). Due nuovi Flagellati parassiti. (Nota prelim.) Atti R. Accad. Lincei xiv. (2 Sem.) p. 542.Google Scholar
França, C. (1916). Quelques observations sur les Trichonymphidae. Ann. Inst. Pasteur, xxx. 195.Google Scholar
França, C. (1918). Observations sur les Trichonymphides. Bull. Soc. Portugaise Sci. Nat. Vol. viii. pp. 1–10 [separate].Google Scholar
França, C. (1918 a). Observations sur les Trichonymphides. An. Sci. Fac. Med. Pôrto, Vol. iv. No. 2 [separate].Google Scholar
França, C. (1918 b). Ma contribution à la connaissance des Trichonymphides. (Réponse à Prof. Battista Grassi). An. Sci. Fac. Med. Pôrto Vol. iv. No. 3 [separate].Google Scholar
Frenzel, J. (1891). Leidyonella cordubensis nov. gen., nov. sp., eine neue Trichonymphide. Arch. f. mikr. Anat. xxxviii. 301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grassi, B. (1885). Intorno ad alcuni protozoi parassiti delle Termiti. Atti Accad. Gioenia Sci. Nat. Catania, (Ser. 3) xviii. 235.Google Scholar
Grassi, B. (1888). Morfologia e sistematica di alcuni protozoi parassiti. Atti R. Accad. Lincei, (Ser. 4) Rendiconti, iv. (1 Sem.) 5.Google Scholar
Grassi, B. (1892). Conclusioni d'una memoria sulla società dei Termiti. Atti R. Accad. Lincei (Ser. 5) i. (1 Sem.) 33.Google Scholar
Grassi, B. (1917) Flagellati viventi nei Termiti. Mem. R. Accad. Lincei, (Ser. 5) xii. (fasc. 8) 331.Google Scholar
Grassi, B. and Foà, A. (1904). Ricerche sulla riproduzione dei Flagellati. I. Processo di divisione della Joenie e forme affini. (Nota prelim). Atti R. Accad. Lincei, (Ser. 5) Rendiconti, xiii. (2 Sem.) 241.Google Scholar
Grassi, B. and Foà, A. (1911). Intorno ai Protozoi dei Termitidi. (Nota prelim). Atti R. Accad. Lincei xx. (1 Sem.) 725.Google Scholar
Grassi, B. and Sandias, A. (1893). Costituzione e sviluppo della societè dei Termitidi. Atti Accad. Gioenia Sci. Nat. Catania, (Ser. 4) Vol. vi. Mem. XIII. and Vol. VII. Mem. I. (1894). [Also issued separately, Catania, 1893. English translation in Quart. Journ. Micro. Sci. Vols. XXXIX. and XL. 1897.]Google Scholar
Hartmann, M. (1910). Untersuchungen über Bau und Entwicklung der Trichonymphiden (Trichonympha hertwigi n. sp.). Festschr. z. 60ten Geburtstag R. Hertwigs, i. 351.Google Scholar
Hozawa, S. (1915)1. Revision of the Japanese Termites. Journ. Coll. Sci. Univ. Tokyo, Vol. xxxv. Art. 7.Google Scholar
Imms, A. D. (1919). On the structure and biology of Archotermopsis, together with descriptions of new species of intestinal protozoa, and general observations on the Isoptera. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London, (B) ccix. 75.Google Scholar
Janicki, C. (1910). Untersuchungen an parasitischen Flagellaten. I. Lophomonas blattarum Stein, L. striata Bütschli. Zeitschr. f. wiss. Zool. xcv. 243.Google Scholar
Janicki, C. (1911). Zur Kenntnis des Parabasalapparats bei parasitischen Flagellaten. Biol.Centralbl. xxxi. 321.Google Scholar
Janicki, C. (1912). Bemerkungen zum Kernteilungsvorgang bei Flagellaten, namentlich bei parasitischen Formen. Verhandl. Naturforsch. Gesellsch. Basel, Vol. xxiii. (pp. 1–30, separate).Google Scholar
Janicki, C. (1915). Untersuchungen an parasitischen Flagellaten. II Teil. Die Gattungen Devescavina, Parajoenia, Stephanonympha, Calonympha.—Ueber den Parabasalapparat.—Ueber Kernkonstitution und Kernteilung. Zeitschr. f. wiss. Zool. cxii. 573.Google Scholar
Kent, W. S. (1885). Notes on the infusorial parasites of the Tasmanian white ant. Papers and Proc. Roy. Soc. Tasmania [for 1884], p. 270. [Reprinted in Ann. and Mag. Nat. Hist. (5 Ser.) xv. 450, 1885.]Google Scholar
Kent, W. S. (1880–1882). A Manual of the Infusoria. (London.)Google Scholar
Kofoid, C. A. and Swezy, O. (1919). Studies on the parasites of the Termites. I. On Streblomastix strix, a polymastigote flagellate with a linear plasmodial phase. II. On Trichomitus termitidis, a polymastigote flagellate with a highly developed neuromotor system. III. On Trichonympha campanula sp. nov. IV. On Leidyopsis sphaerica gen. nov., sp. nov. Univ. of California Publ. in Zool. xx. 1.Google Scholar
Koidzumi, M. (1916 and 1917). Studies on the protozoa harboured by the termites of Japan. [In Japanese.] Report of Investigations on Termites (Govt. Inst. of Sci., Formosa), v. 55 (1916) and VI 1 (1917).Google Scholar
Leidy, J. (1877). On intestinal parasites of Termes flavipes. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, p. 146.Google Scholar
Leidy, J. (1881). The parasites of the termites. Journ. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, viii (N. S.). 425.Google Scholar
Lespès, C. (1856). Recherches sur l'organisation et les mœurs du Termite lucifuge. Ann. Sci. Nat., Zool. (Set. 4) v. 227.Google Scholar
Porter, J. F. (1897). Trichonympha, and other parasites of Termes flavipes. Bull. Mus. Camp. Zool. Harvard College, xxxi. 47.Google Scholar
Ship, A. (1881). Parasites of white ants. American Monthly Microscop. Journ. ii. 228.Google Scholar
Simmons, W. J. (1890). Parasites of the white ant. American Monthly Microscop. Journ. xi. 57. [Also French translation in Journ. de Microgr. XIV. 302 (1890).]Google Scholar
Zulueta, A. de (1915). Sobre la reproducción de Dinenympha gracilis Leidy. Trab. MuS. Nac. Ci. Nat. Madrid, (Ser. Zool.) No. 23.Google Scholar