Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-995ml Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T13:38:43.843Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Collaborative care for depression in UK primary care: a randomized controlled trial

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 September 2007

D. A. Richards*
Affiliation:
Department of Health Sciences, University of York, UK
K. Lovell
Affiliation:
Department of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, University of Manchester, UK
S. Gilbody
Affiliation:
Department of Health Sciences, University of York, UK
L. Gask
Affiliation:
National Primary Care Research and Development Centre, University of Manchester, UK
D. Torgerson
Affiliation:
Department of Health Sciences, University of York, UK
M. Barkham
Affiliation:
Centre for Psychotherapy Services Research, University of Sheffield, UK
M. Bland
Affiliation:
Department of Health Sciences, University of York, UK
P. Bower
Affiliation:
National Primary Care Research and Development Centre, University of Manchester, UK
A. J. Lankshear
Affiliation:
School of Nursing and Midwifery Studies, University of Cardiff, UK
A. Simpson
Affiliation:
Department of Health Sciences, University of York, UK
J. Fletcher
Affiliation:
Department of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, University of Manchester, UK
D. Escott
Affiliation:
Department of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, University of Manchester, UK
S. Hennessy
Affiliation:
Department of Health Sciences, University of York, UK
R. Richardson
Affiliation:
Department of Health Sciences, University of York, UK
*
*Address for correspondence: Professor D. A. Richards, Department of Health Sciences, Seebohm Rowntree Building, University of York, University Road, Heslington, York, North Yorkshire, United Kingdom. (Email: dr17@york.ac.uk)

Abstract

Background

Collaborative care is an effective intervention for depression which includes both organizational and patient-level intervention components. The effect in the UK is unknown, as is whether cluster- or patient-randomization would be the most appropriate design for a Phase III clinical trial.

Method

We undertook a Phase II patient-level randomized controlled trial in primary care, nested within a cluster-randomized trial. Depressed participants were randomized to ‘collaborative care’ – case manager-coordinated medication support and brief psychological treatment, enhanced specialist and GP communication – or a usual care control. The primary outcome was symptoms of depression (PHQ-9).

Results

We recruited 114 participants, 41 to the intervention group, 38 to the patient randomized control group and 35 to the cluster-randomized control group. For the intervention compared to the cluster control the PHQ-9 effect size was 0.63 (95% CI 0.18–1.07). There was evidence of substantial contamination between intervention and patient-randomized control participants with less difference between the intervention group and patient-randomized control group (−2.99, 95% CI −7.56 to 1.58, p=0.186) than between the intervention and cluster-randomized control group (−4.64, 95% CI −7.93 to −1.35, p=0.008). The intra-class correlation coefficient for our primary outcome was 0.06 (95% CI 0.00–0.32).

Conclusions

Collaborative care is a potentially powerful organizational intervention for improving depression treatment in UK primary care, the effect of which is probably partly mediated through the organizational aspects of the intervention. A large Phase III cluster-randomized trial is required to provide the most methodologically accurate test of these initial encouraging findings.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barkham, M, Margison, F, Leach, C, Lucock, M, Mellor-Clark, J, Evans, C, Benson, L, Connell, J, Audin, K, McGrath, G (2001). Service profiling and outcomes benchmarking using the CORE-OM: towards practice-based evidence in the psychological therapies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 69, 184196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanchard, M, Waterreus, A, Mann, A (1995). The effect of primary care nurse intervention upon older people screened as depressed. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 10, 289298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bower, P, Gilbody, S (2005). Managing common mental health disorders in primary care: conceptual models and evidence base. British Medical Journal 330, 839842.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campbell, M, Fitzpatrick, R, Haines, A, Kinmonth, AL, Sandercock, P, Spiegelhalter, D, Tyrer, P (2000). Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. British Medical Journal 321, 694696.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, J (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Erlbaum: Hillsdale, NJ.Google Scholar
Cuijpers, P, van Straten, A, Warmerdam, L (2007). Behavioural activation treatments of depression: a meta analysis. Clinical Psychology Review 27, 318326.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dimidjian, S, Hollon, S, Dobson, K, Schmaling, KB, Kohlenberg, RJ, Addis, ME, Gallo, R, McGlinchey, JB, Markley, DK, Gollan, JK, Atkins, DC, Dunne, DL, Jacobson, NS (2006). Randomized trial of behavioural activation, cognitive therapy, and antidepressant medication in the acute treatment of adults with major depression. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 74, 658670.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gensichen, J, Beyer, M, Muth, C, Gerlach, FM, Von Korff, M, Ormel, J (2005). Case management to improve major depression in primary health care: a systematic review. Psychological Medicine 36, 714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbody, S, Bower, P, Fletcher, J, Richards, DA, Sutton, A (2006). Collaborative care for depression: a systematic review and cumulative meta-analysis. Archives of Internal Medicine 166, 23142321.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilbody, S, Whitty, P, Grimshaw, J, Thomas, R (2003). Educational and organizational interventions to improve the management of depression in primary care: a systematic review. Journal of the American Medical Association 289, 31453151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gunn, J, Diggens, J, Hegarty, K, Blashki, G (2006). A systematic review of complex system interventions designed to increase recovery from depression in primary care. BMC Health Services Research 6, 88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jacobson, N, Dobson, K, Traux, P, Addis, ME, Koerner, K, Gollan, JK, Gortner, E, Prince, SE (1996). A component analysis of cognitive-behavioural treatment of depression. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 64, 295304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katon, W, Von Korff, M, Lin, E, Simon, G, Walker, E, Unützer, J, Bush, T, Russo, J, Ludman, E (1999). Stepped collaborative care for primary care patients with persistent symptoms of depression: a randomized trial. Archives of General Psychiatry 56, 11091115.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Killaspy, H, Bebbington, P, Blizard, R, Johnson, S, McCrone, P, Nolan, F, Pilling, S, King, M (2005). The REACT study: a Randomised Evaluation of Assertive Community Treatment in North London. British Medical Journal 331, 599604.Google Scholar
Kroenke, K, Spitzer, RL, Williams, JB (2001). The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. Journal of General Internal Medicine 16, 606613.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Layard, R (2006). The case for psychological treatment centres. British Medical Journal 332, 10301032.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lipsey, M, Wilson, D (2001). Practical Meta-Analysis. Sage: New York.Google Scholar
Mann, A, Blizard, R, Murray, J, Smith, JA, Botega, N, MacDonald, E, Wilkinson, G (1998). An evaluation of practice nurses working with general practitioners to treat people with depression. British Journal of General Practice 48, 875879.Google ScholarPubMed
Martell, CR, Addis, ME, Jacobson, NS (2001). Depression in Context: Strategies for Guided Action. Norton: New York.Google Scholar
MRC (2000). A Framework for Development and Evaluation of RCTs for Complex Interventions to Improve Health. Medical Research Council: London.Google Scholar
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2004). Depression: Management of Depression in Primary and Secondary Care (Clinical guideline 23). NICE: London.Google Scholar
Peveler, R, George, C, Kinmonth, A, Campbell, M, Thompson, C (1999). Effect of antidepressant drug counselling and information leaflets on adherence to drug treatment in primary care: randomised controlled trial. British Medical Journal 319, 612615.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richards, DA, Barkham, M, Bower, P, Gask, L, Gilbody, S, Lovell, K, Rogers, A, Torgerson, D, Escott, D, Fletcher, J, Hennessy, S, Kendall, S, Lankshear, AJ, Richardson, R, Simpson, A (2006 b). A Trial Platform of Enhanced Care for Depression in Primary Care: Final Report. University of York: York.Google Scholar
Richards, DA, Lankshear, AJ, Fletcher, J, Rogers, A, Barkham, M, Bower, P, Gask, L, Gilbody, S, Lovell, K (2006 a). Developing a UK protocol for collaborative care: a qualitative study. General Hospital Psychiatry 28, 296305.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simon, G (2006). Collaborative care for depression. British Medical Journal 332, 249250.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singleton, N, Bumpstead, R, O'Brien, M, Lee, A, Meltzer, HY (2001). Office of National Statistics: Psychiatric Morbidity Among Adults Living in Private Households. HMSO: London.Google Scholar
Spitzer, RL, Williams, JB, Gibbon, M, First, MB (1992). The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R (SCID). I: History, rationale, and description. Archives of General Psychiatry 49, 624629.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ukoumunne, OC, Gulliford, MC, Chinn, S, Sterne, JA, Burney, PG, Donner, A (1999). Methods in health service research. Evaluation of health interventions at area and organisation level. British Medical Journal 319, 376379.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Unutzer, J, Katon, W, Callahan, CM, Williams, Jr. JW, Hunkeler, E, Harpole, L, Hoffing, M, Della, Penna RD, Noel, PH, Lin, EH, Arean, PA, Hegel, MT, Tang, L, Belin, TR, Oishi, S, Langston, C, IMPACT Investigators (2002). Collaborative care management of late-life depression in the primary care setting: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of the American Medical Association 288, 28362845.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Von Korff, M, Goldberg, D (2001). Improving outcomes in depression. British Medical Journal 323, 948949.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wagner, EH, Austin, BT & Von Korff, M (1996). Organizing care for patients with chronic illness. Milbank Quarterly 74, 511544.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ware, JE, Kosinski, M, Dewey, JE (2000). How to Score Version Two of the SF-36 Health Survey. Quality Metric Incorporated: Lincoln, RI.Google Scholar
Wells, KB, Sherbourne, C, Schoenbaum, M, Duan, N, Meredith, L, Unutzer, J, Miranda, J, Carney, MF, Rubenstein, LV (2000). Impact of disseminating quality improvement programs for depression in managed primary care: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of the American Medical Association 283, 212220.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
White, H (1980). A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica 48, 817838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, G, Allen, P, Marshall, E, Walker, J, Browne, W, Mann, AH (1993). The role of the practice nurse in the management of depression in general practice: treatment adherence to antidepressant medication. Psychological Medicine 23, 229237.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
WHO (2001). The World Health Report 2001: Mental Health: New Understanding, New Hope. World Health Organisation: Geneva.Google Scholar