Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T15:18:30.163Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Modes of long-run development: Latin America and East Asia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2008

RICHARD GRABOWSKI
RICHARD GRABOWSKI*
Affiliation:
Southern Illinois University, Illinois
*
* Correspondence to: Department of Economics, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, Illinois 62901, USA. Email: ricardo@siu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this paper, two models of long-run development are constructed, one for a unimodal agricultural structure and the other for a bimodal agricultural structure. The process of the evolution of state institutional capacity under these two structures is analyzed. Capacity is measured by the ability of the state to extract revenue in return for which services are provided. The development of such capacity is seen as the key factor in providing the human capital and infrastructure necessary for the shift from inward- to outward-oriented development. Latin America and East Asia are used as examples of these two modes of long-run development.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Institutional Economics , Volume 4 , Issue 1 , April 2008 , pp. 25 - 50
Copyright
Copyright © The JOIE Foundation 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acemoglu, Daron, Johnson, Simon, and Robinson, James A. (2001), ‘The Colonial origins of comparative development: an empirical investigation’, American Economic Review, 91 (5): 1319–1401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ban, S. Hwan (1979), ‘Agricultural growth in Korea, 1918–1971’, in Hayami, Y., Ruttan, V., and Southworth, H. (eds), Agricultural Growth in Japan, Taiwan, Korea, and the Philippines, Honolulu: University Press of Hawaii, pp. 90–116.Google Scholar
Bird, Richard M. (1977), ‘Land taxation and economic development: the model of Meiji Japan’, Journal of Development Studies, 13 (2): 162–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coatsworth, John (2005), ‘Structures, endowments, and institutions in the economic history of Latin America’, Latin American Research Review, 40 (3): 126–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coatsworth, John H. and Williamson, Jeffrey G. (2004), ‘Always protectionist? Latin American tariffs from independence to Great Depression’, Journal of Latin American Studies, 36 (2): 205–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, Harold, Ohanian, Lee, Riascos, Alvaro, and Schmitz, James (2005), ‘Latin America in the rearview mirror’, Journal of Monetary Economics, 52 (1): 69–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engerman, Stanley and Sokoloff, Kenneth (2002), ‘Factor endowments, inequality, and paths of development among New World economies’, Economia, 3 (1): 41–109.Google Scholar
Haber, Steven (2003), ‘It wasn't all prebisch's fault: the political economy of Latin American industrialization’, Stanford University, pp. 1–84.Google Scholar
Hanley, S.B. and Yamamura, K. (1972), Economic and Demographic Change in Preindustrial Japan, 1600–1868, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hauser, W.B. (1974), Economic and Institutional Change in Tokugawa Japan: Osaka and the Kinai Cotton Trade, London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hayami, Y. and Kikuchi, M. (1982), Asian Village Economy at the Crossreads: An Economic Approach to Institutional Change, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University, Press.Google Scholar
Hayami, Yujiro and Kawagoe, Toshihiko (1993), The Agrarian Origins of Commerce and Industry, New York: St. Martins Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, Bruce F. and Kilby, Peter (1975), Agriculture and Structural Transformation: Economic Strategies in Late-Developing Countries, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kay, Cristobál (2001), ‘Asia's and Latin America's development in comparative perspective’, Working Paper Series No. 336, Institute of Social Studies, The Hague-Netherlands.Google Scholar
Khattery, Barsha and Rao, J. Mohan (2002), ‘Fiscal faux pas?: an analysis of the revenue implications of trade liberalization’, World Development, 30 (8): 1431–1444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knack, Stephen and Keefer, Philip (1995), ‘Institutions and economic performance: cross-country tests using alternative institutional measures’, Economics and Politics, 7 (3): 207–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kubota, Keiko (2005), ‘Fiscal constraints, collection costs, and trade policies’, Economics and Politics, 17 (1): 129–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, T.H. and Chen, Y.E. (1979), ‘Agricultural growth in Taiwan 1911–1972’, in Hayami, Y., Ruttan, V., and Southworth, H. (eds), Agricultural Growth in Japan, Taiwan, Korea and the Philippines, Honolulu: University Press of Hawaii.Google Scholar
Lerner, A. (1936), ‘The symmetry between import and export taxes’, Economica, 3 (August 1936): 306–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahon, James E. (1992), ‘Was Latin America too rich to prosper? Structural and political obstacles to export-led industrial growth’, Journal of Development Studies, 28 (2): 241–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, Mick (1998), ‘Death without taxes: democracy, state capacity, and aid dependence in the fourth world’, in Robinson, Mark and White, Gordon (eds), The Democratic Development State: Politics and Institutional Design, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 84–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, Mick (2001), ‘Political underdevelopment: what causes “bad governance”’, Institute of Development Studies.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, R.H. and Saburo, Y. (1984), ‘Agricultural development in the Empire’, in Myers, R.H. and Peattie, M.R. (eds), The Japanese Colonial Empire, 1895–1945, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 420–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, Chong Kee (1978), ‘Taxation and economic development in Korea’, Korea Development Institute, Working Paper 7807, Korea Modernization Series No. 13.Google Scholar
Rodrik, Dani (1996), ‘Coordination failures and government policy: a model with applications to East Asia and Eastern Europe’, Journal of International Economics, 40 (1–2): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rozenwurcel, G. (2006), ‘Why have all development strategies failed in Latin America?’, Research Paper No. 2006/1, United Nations University, World Institute for Development Economics Research (WIDER).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shafer, D. Michael (1994), Winners and Losers: How Sectors Shape the Developmental Prospects of States, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Shin, Gi-Wook (1996), Peasant Protest and Social Change in Colonial Korea, Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Smethurst, Richard (1986), Agricultural Development and Tenancy Disputes in Japan, 1870–1940, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, T.C. (1973), ‘Premodern economic growth: Japan and the West’, Past and Present, 60 (August): 127–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, T.C. (1988), Native Sources of Japanese Industrialization, 1750–1920, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sokoloff, Kenneth and Zolt, Eric (2005), ‘Inequality and the evolution of institutions of taxation: evidence from the economic history of the Americas’, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Takigawa, T. (1972), ‘Historical background of agricultural land reform in Japan’, The Developing Economies, 10 (3): 296–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vlastos, S. (1986), Peasant Protests and Uprisings in Tokugawa Japan, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Wade, Robert (1990), Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Government in East Asian Industrialization, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weingast, Barry (1995), ‘The economic role of political institutions: market preserving federalism and economic development’, Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 11 (1): 1–32.Google Scholar