Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T16:59:27.392Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sabotaging the Peace: The Politics of Extremist Violence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2003

Get access

Abstract

Why are extremists able to sabotage peace processes in some cases but not others? And under what conditions will the public respond to such provocation and return to unpopular wars? We seek to show that extremist violence is not indiscriminate or irrational as many people have assumed but quite strategic. We argue that extremist violence intentionally plays on the uncertainty that exists between the more moderate groups who are attempting to negotiate a peace agreement. Using a game-theoretic model of the interaction of extremist violence and mistrust, we identify the conditions under which extremists will succeed and fail. We find that extremists are most likely to succeed in derailing a peace process when the targeted side believes that opposition moderates are strong. At these times, the public perceives moderates as best able to control and suppress extremists within their own ranks. When moderates are viewed as weak and unable to crack down on extremists, terrorism is more likely to fail. We discuss this finding, as well as a number of additional implications of the model, in connection with the Israeli–Palestinian case.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The IO Foundation 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arian, Asher. 1995. Security Threatened: Surveying Israeli Opinion on Peace and War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, Robert H., Grief, Avner, Levi, Margaret, Rosenthal, Jean-Laurent, and Weingast, Barry R.. 1998. Analytic Narratives. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cetinyan, Rupen, and Stein, Arthur A.. 1997. Rational Extremism. Paper presented at the 93rd Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Coleman, James S. 1990. Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
De Figueiredo, Rui, and Weingast, Barry R.. 1998. Vicious Cycles: Endogenous Political Extremism and Political Violence. Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Fearon, James D. 1998. Bargaining, Enforcement, and International Cooperation. International Organization 52 (2):269305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fearon, James D., and Laitin, David D.. 1996. Explaining Interethnic Cooperation. American Political Science Review 90 (4):715–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, Joshua A., Pevehouse, Jon C., Gerner, Deborah J., and Telhami, Shibley. 2000. Reciprocity, Triangularity, and Cooperation in the Middle East, 1979–1997. Unpublished manuscript. Available at ⟨www.american.edu/academic.depts/sis/goldtext/me98papr.htm⟩.Google Scholar
Güth, Werner, and Kliemt, Hartmut. 1994. Competition or Co-Operation: On the Evolutionary Economics of Trust, Exploitation, and Moral Attitudes. Metroeconomica 45 (2):155–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kass, Ilana, and O'Neill, Bard. 1997. The Deadly Embrace: The Impact of Israeli and Palestinian Rejectionism on the Peace Process. Lanham, Md.: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Kydd, Andrew. 2000. Trust, Reassurance, and Cooperation. International Organization 54 (2):325–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mishal, Shaul, and Sela, Avraham. 2000. The Palestinian Hamas: Vision, Violence, and Coexistence. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Morris, Benny. 1999. Righteous Victims: A History of the Zionist–Arab Conflict, 1881–1999. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Morrow, James D. 1994. Game Theory for Political Scientists. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Walter, Barbara F. 2002. Committing to Peace: The Successful Settlement of Civil Wars. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar