Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-15T20:04:16.656Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Return of fertility after use of the injectable contraceptive Depo Provera: up-dated data analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2008

Tieng Pardthaisong
Affiliation:
Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand

Summary

Seven hundred and ninety six Thai women who stopped using the long-acting injectable contraceptive depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA, Depo Provera), 437 women who stopped using oral contraceptives and 125 women who had an IUD removed to have a planned pregnancy, were followed up to ascertain the delay to conception after the end of contraception and to determine the proportion of women who did not conceive in the 4 years after discontinuation. The median delay to conception was 5·5 months plus the estimated duration of the effect of the last injection of DMPA, 3 months for oral contraceptives and 4·5 months after discontinuing the IUD. The proportion of women who did not conceive within 9 months after discontinuation of DMPA is similar to that of ex-IUD users, and by 3 years to that of the ex-pill sample. There is no evidence to suggest that prolonged use of DMPA increases the delay to conception, and the return of fertility among never pregnant ex-users resembled that of ever pregnant ex-users.

There were comparable proportions of live births among ex-DMPA users and ex-pill users and both of these showed higher proportions of live-births than ex-IUD users. There was no evidence to suggest that previous use of DMPA had any significant adverse effect on the outcome of pregnancy of the subsequent births. This study did not show any association between infertility and the previous use of DMPA or other contraceptives.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Fries, H. & Nillius, S.J. (1973) Psychological factors, psychiatric illness and amenorrhoea after oral contraceptive treatment. Acta psychiat. scand. 49, 653.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jain, A.K. & Moots, B. (1977) Fecundability following the discontinuation of IUD use among Taiwanese women. J. biosoc. Sci. 9, 137.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McDaniel, E.B. & Pardthaisong, T. (1971) Return of menstruation and fertility in Thai women after contraceptive injections. J. biosoc. Sci. 3, 209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McDaniel, E.B. & Pardthaisong, T. (1973) Depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate as a contraceptive agent: return of fertility after discontinuation of use. Contraception, 8, 407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pardthaisong, T. (1978) The return of fertility and outcome of pregnancy after discontinuing the use of Depo Provera and other contraceptives. The Depo Provera Debate: Hearings Before the Select Committee on Population, US House of Representatives. Ninety-fifty congress session, no. 12, 453. Government Printer, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Pardthaisong, T. (1981) Return of Fertility and Outcome of Pregnancy after Discontinuation of the Injectable Contraceptive Depot Medroxyprogesterone. PhD thesis, University of London.Google Scholar
Pardthaisong, T. & Gray, R.H. (1981) The return of fertility following discontinuation of oral contraceptives in Thailand. Fert. Steril. 35, 532.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pardthaisong, T., Gray, R.H. & McDaniel, E.B. (1980) Return of fertility after discontinuation of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate and intra-uterine devices in northern Thailand. Lancet, 1, 509.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schawallie, P.C. & Assenzo, J.R. (1974) The effect of depomedroxyprogesterone acetate on pituitary and ovarian function and the return of fertility following its discontinuation; a review. Contraception, 10, 181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tatum, H.J. (1974) Comparative experience with newer models of the Copper T in the United States. In: Analysis of Intrauterine Contraception, pp. 155163. Edited by Hefani, F. and Segal, S. J., North Holland/American Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Tietze, C. & Lewit, S. (1970) Evaluation of intrauterine devices: ninth progress report of the co-operative statistical program. Stud. Fam. Plann. 55, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treloar, A.E., Boynton, R.E., Behn, B.G. & Brown, B.W. (1967) Variation of the human menstrual cycle through reproductive life. Int. J. Fert. 12, 77.Google ScholarPubMed
Vessey, M.P., Wright, N.R., McPherson, K. & Wiggins, P. (1978) Fertility after stopping different methods of contraception. Br. med. J. 1, 265.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wajntraub, G. (1970) Fertility after removal of the intrauterine ring. Fert. Steril. 21, 555.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed