Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T06:57:29.196Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Effect of Pruning at Different Heights on Yields, Dry Matter Production and Partitioning in Clonal Tea (Camellia Sinensis) in Kenya

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2008

M. J. S. Magambo  and
Kimani Waithaka
M. J. S. Magambo
Affiliation:
Crop Science Department, University of Nairobi, Kenya
Kimani Waithaka
Affiliation:
Crop Science Department, University of Nairobi, Kenya
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Dry matter production and partitioning in old clonal tea bushes pruned and maintained at different heights were investigated. New tissues (leaves, new branches and small roots) consti- tuted a small fraction of the total dry matter in all bushes pruned and initially maintained at 70, 40, 25 and 10 cm high, 36 months after pruning. Leaf/frame dry matter ratio was larger and the shoot/root and frame/root ratios were smaller in the bushes initially maintained at 10 cm than in the bushes maintained at other heights. Yields per unit area of the plucking surface were greatest in the smallest bushes initially maintained at 10 cm in 42 months of recording but on the basis of the available space they were greatest in the large bushes initially maintained at 70 cm.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 21 , Issue 1 , January 1985 , pp. 67 - 72
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barua, D. N. (1973). Distribution of shoots on the plucking surface of a tea bush and its relationship to spacing. Part II. Two and a Bud 20:1–10.Google Scholar
Barua, D. N. & Dutta, K. N. (1971). Distribution of shoots on the plucking surface of a tea bush in relationship to spacing. Two and a Bud 18:8–11.Google Scholar
Chatravorty, S. K. & Awasthi, R. C. (1981). Economic evaluation of plant density. Two and a Bud 28: 32–34.Google Scholar
Kozlowski, T. T. (1971). Growth and Development of Trees. Vol. I., 127–129. New York, London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Magambo, M. J. S. (1977). Effect of spacing on distribution of shoots on the plucking surface. Tea Research Institute of East Africa – Annual Report, 34–37. Kericho, Kenya: TRI.Google Scholar
Magambo, M. J. S. (1978). Growth characteristics and dry matter partitioning in young plants of some TRIEA-clones. Tea Research Institute of East Africa – Annual Report, 42–47. Kericho, Kenya: TRI.Google Scholar
Magambo, M. J. S. (1983). Dry matter production and partitioning in clonal tea (Camellia sinensis L.) in Kenya. PhD thesis, University of Nairobi.Google Scholar
Magambo, M. J. S. & Cannell, M. G. R. (1981). Dry matter production and partitioning in relation to yields of tea. Experimental Agriculture 17:33–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagarajah, S. & Pethiyagoda, U. (1965). The influence of lungs on carbohydrate reserves and growth of shoots. Tea Quarterly 36:88–102.Google Scholar
Rahman, F., Fareed, M. & Saikia, P. (1981). Effect of bush population on yield of tea. Journal of Planta- tion Crops 9:100–104.Google Scholar
Selvendran, R. R. & Selvendran, S. (1972). Changes in polysaccarides of tea plants during post-prune growth. Phytochemistry 11:3167–3171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Templer, J. C. (1975). Spatial distribution of shoots on tea bushes. Tea Research Institute of East Africa – Annual Report, p. 100. Kericho, Kenya: TRI.Google Scholar
Venkata Ram, C. S. (1976). Rejuvenation of unthrifty tea. Warta BPTK 2:133–140.Google Scholar
Wareing, P. F. & Patrick, J. (1973). Source-sink relations and the partitioning of assimilates in the plant. In Photosynthesis and Productivity in Different Environments, 481–499 (Ed. Cooper, J. P.). Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar