a1 Department for Neurobiology and Cognition Research, University of Vienna, A-1090 Vienna, Austria; gyula.gajdon@univie.ac.at http://www.nc.univie.ac.at/index.php?id=7246
a2 Konrad Lorenz Institute for Ethology, Austrian Academy of Sciences, A-1160 Vienna, Austria.
Abstract
Ramsey et al.'s article provides a more sensitive framework for comparative innovation than others' operationalisations have done. Nevertheless, a methodology has to be elaborated in order to determine to what degree a behaviour is novel. Psychological processes have to be considered when evaluating the value of reference groups and in order to figure out where to look for innovation.
Related Articles