Religious Studies



Inclusion and Incarnation: a reply to Sturch


TIM BAYNE a1
a1 Philosophy Department, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia

Abstract

I make three points in response to Richard Sturch's comments on my paper: I defend my interpretation of the Morris–Swinburne (M–S) account of the Incarnation; I argue that the M–S model appears to undercut the view that the unity of consciousness can be explained in terms of the self; and third, I argue that M–S model seems to entail that God has false beliefs.