Behavioral and Brain Sciences



Author's Response
Commentary on Patricia M. Greenfield (1991) Language, tools, and brain: The ontogeny and phylogeny of hierarchically organized sequential behavior. BBS 14:531–95.

Author's Response


Patricia M. Greenfield a1
a1 Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095 greenfield@psych.ucla.edu http://www.psych.ucla/Faculty/Greenfield

Abstract

Ronan Reilly's connectionist simulation both strengthens and advances the theoretical model presented in my 1991 target article, “Language, Tools, and Brain: The Ontogeny and Phylogeny of Hierarchically Organized Sequential Behavior.” Reilly has tested the whole ontogenetic model with a single simulation study explicitly planned for this purpose. His methodology has established that the various components of the theoretical model imply and are compatible with one another. It has also indicated how learning can actualize a pre-established ontogenetic sequence of combining lingusitic symbols and objects. His simulation suggests that the acquisition of linguistic speech may be facilitated by experience with object manipulation, but not vice versa. This hypothesis can and should be empirically tested through research on behavioral development in the two domains. Finally, Reilly has simulated brain architecture, as well as neural learning. His simulation therefore shows how the development of language and object manipulation can result from an interaction between preprogrammed neural architecture (analogous to network architecture) and experience (analogous to the network's training cycles).