Behavioral and Brain Sciences



Author's Response
Commentary on Phillipe G. Schyns, Robert L. Goldstone, and Jean-Pierre Thibaut (1998) The development of features in object concepts. BBS 21:1–54.

Functional identification of constraints on feature creation


Phillipe G. Schyns a1, Robert L. Goldstone a2 and Jean-Pierre Thibaut a3
a1 Department of Psychology, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QB, United Kingdom philippe@psy.gla.ac.uk www.psy.gla.ac.uk
a2 Department of Psychology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405 rgoldsto@ucs.indiana.edu http://cognitrn.psych.indiana.edu/
a3 Department of Psychology, Université de Liège, Batiment B32, Sart-Tilman, 4000 Liège, Belgium jthibaut@ulg.ac.be

Abstract

Dawson's provocative comment makes three connected points: (1) to be falsifiable, theories that assume flexible features must constrain their feature creation and mechanisms, (2) the explanatory power of such functional theories is rooted in the properties of their underlying physical mechanisms, and (3) to derive the relevant constraints of feature creation from these mechanisms, it is critical to avoid the scope slip. We will argue here that even though we agree with (1) and (2), (3) confuses two different levels of analysis of computational systems: the functional identification and the physical implementation of relevant constraints.



Metrics