Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-ws8qp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T15:23:36.496Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Theoretical and applied issues in the provision of absolute and comparative risk information

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 June 2002

PETER HARRIS
Affiliation:
Centre for Research in Social Attitudes, Department of Psychology, University of Sheffield, Western Bank, Sheffield S10 2TP, UK. E-mail: p.harris@sheffield.ac.uk
PAUL SPARKS
Affiliation:
University of SussexUK
MONIQUE RAATS
Affiliation:
University of SurreyUK
Get access

Abstract

Klein (1997) found that participants were more influenced by information about their comparative risk standing than information about their absolute risk standing. If reliable, these findings have important implications for understanding and improving risk communication. In this paper we report the findings of several unsuccessful attempts by us to replicate Klein's findings in the UK, using one of his experimental paradigms, and discuss the findings of other recent attempts to replicate his work. Findings are inconsistent from study to study but, overall, provide some evidence that people respond to comparative and not just to absolute risk information. Issues that need to be addressed systematically in future research include: the ambiguity of absolute information, proportional differences in risk magnitude, cross-cultural and individual differences in preferences for social comparison information, and the systematic exploration of responses to absolute and comparative risk information in real choice situations.

Type
Technical Paper
Copyright
© Risk Decision and Policy, 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)