Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-04T16:32:07.715Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the utility of combining production data and perceptual data to investigate regional linguistic variation: The case of Spanish experiential gustar ‘to like, to please’ on Twitter and in an online survey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 August 2016

Earl K. Brown
Earl K. Brown*
Affiliation:
Kansas State University
*
*Address for correspondence: Earl K. Brown, 104 Eisenhower Hall, Manhattan, Kansas 66503, +1-785-532-6760, E-mail: ekbrown@ksu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The use of both production and perceptual data has the potential to provide a more complete picture of linguistic phenomena than would otherwise be the case, including when exploring regional linguistic variation. Utilizing the social networking platform Twitter and an online survey, this paper reports on a descriptive analysis of the geographic distribution of a less-commonly used syntactic form of the Spanish verb gustar ‘to like, to please’, referred to as experiential gustar (e.g., cuando gustes ‘when you’d like’). The results from the analysis of 6,686 tweets together with the responses of 81 native Spanish-speaking participants in an online survey suggest that experiential gustar is produced and is perceived to be produced most often in Mexican Spanish, despite not being exclusive to that country. The paper contributes to the literature depicting the benefit of using both production and perceptual data in the study of dialectal variation, as well as to the literature documenting language variation in Spanish.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Linguistic Geography , Volume 3 , Issue 2 , September 2015 , pp. 47 - 59
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alonso, Amado. 1967. Estudios lingüísticos. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Alvarez, Irina Arguelles & Muñoz, Alfonso Muñoz. 2012. An insight into Twitter: a corpus based contrastive study in English and Spanish. Revista de Linguistica y Lenguas Aplicadas (RLLA) 7. 37-50.Google Scholar
Alvar, Manuel. 1996. Manual de dialectología española: El español de España. Barcelona: Ariel.Google Scholar
Andrade, Magdalena, Egasse, Jeanne, Muñoz, Elías Miguel & Cabrera-Puche, María. 2013. Tu mundo: español sin fronteras. 1st edn. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Bamman, David, Eisenstein, Jacob & Schnoebelen, Tyler. 2014. Gender identity and lexical variation in social media. Journal of Sociolinguistics 18(2).135-160.Google Scholar
Blitt, Mary Ann & Casas, Margarita. 2011. Exploraciones. 1st edn. Heinle: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
Boyd-Bowman, Peter. 1960. El habla de Guanajuato. Ciudad de México: Imprenta Universitaria.Google Scholar
Castells, Matilde Olivella, Guzmán, Elizabeth E., Lapuerta, Paloma E. & Liskin-Gasparro, Judith E.. 2009. Mosaicos: Spanish as a world language. 5th edn. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Cotton, Eleanor Greet & Sharp, John M.. 1988. Spanish in the Americas. (Romance Languages and Linguistics Series). Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Dorwick, Thalia, Girones, Ana Maria Perez, Knorre, Marty, Glass, William R. & Villarreal, Hildebrando. 2006. ¿Que tal?: An Introductory Course. 7th edn. Boston: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Dorwick, Thalia, Pérez-Gironés, Ana María, Becher, Anne, Isabelli, Casilde & Elliott, A. Raymond. 2011. Puntos de partida: An Invitation to Spanish. 9th edn. San Francisco, CA: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Eisenstein, Jacob, O’Connor, Brendan, Smith, Noah A. & Xing, Eric P.. 2010. A latent variable model for geographic lexical variation. Proceedings of the 2010 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 1277-1287. Stroudsburg, PA, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar
García de Diego, Vicente. 1978. Dialectología española. Madrid: Ediciones Cultura Hispánica del Centro Iberoamericano de Cooperación.Google Scholar
Gentry, Jeff. 2014. twitteR: R based Twitter client. https://github.com/geoffjentry/twitteR. (Accessed:).Google Scholar
González-Aguilar, María & Rosso-O’Laughlin, Marta. 2011. Atando cabos: Curso intermedio de español. 4th edn. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Haddican, Bill & Johnson, Daniel Ezra. 2012. Effects on the particle verb alternation across English dialects. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 18(2). 31-40.Google Scholar
Kany, Charles E. 1951. American-Spanish Syntax. 2nd edn. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Klee, Carol & Lynch, Andrew. 2009. El español en contacto con otras lenguas, (Georgetown Studies in Spanish Linguistics). Washington, D.C: Georgetown University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kwak, Haewoon, Lee, Changhyun, Park, Hosung & Moon, Sue. 2010. What is Twitter, a social network or a news media? WWW ‘10: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web. 591-600. New York: ACM.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. 1975. Empirical foundations of linguistic theory. In Robert Austerlitz (ed.), The scope of American linguistics, 77-133. Ghent, Belgium: The Peter de Ridder Press.Google Scholar
Leeser, Michael, VanPatten, Bill & Keating, Gregory D.. 2010. Asi lo veo: Gente, Perspectivas, Comunicación. 1st edn. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Lipski, John. 1994. Latin American Spanish. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Long, Daniel & Preston, Dennis R. (eds). 2002. Handbook of perceptual dialectology, vol. 2. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Merkhofer, Elizabeth M. 2013. She, he and they trending on Twitter: Polyvocal pronouns and more-public messages. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University thesis.Google Scholar
Murillo, Maria C. Lucas & Dawson, Laila M.. 2012. Con brio: Beginning Spanish. 3rd edn. Hoboken, N.J.: Wiley.Google Scholar
Niedzielski, Nancy A. & Preston, Dennis R.. 2000. Folk linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pascual Cabo, Diego. 2013. Agreement reflexes of emerging optionality in heritage speaker Spanish. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida dissertation.Google Scholar
Preston, Dennis R. 1989. Perceptual dialectology. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preston, Dennis R. 1993. Folk dialectology. In Dennis R. Preston (ed.), American dialect research, 333-377. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preston, Dennis R. 1996. Where the worst English is spoken. In E. Schneider (ed.), Focus on the USA, 297-360. (Varieties of English around the World). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Preston, Dennis R. 2011. Methods in (applied) folk linguistics. AILA Review 24(1). 15-39.Google Scholar
Ramos, Alicia & Davis, Robert L.. 2008. Portafolio. 1st edn. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
R Development Core Team. 2014. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org.Google Scholar
Renjilian-Burgy, Joy, Mraz, Susan M., Chiquito, Ana Beatriz & De Darer, Verónica. 2003. Reflejos. 1st edn. Boston: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
Ruiz Tinoco, Antonio. 2012. Twitter as a corpus for Spanish geolinguistic studies. Sophia Linguistica 60. 147-163.Google Scholar
Sala, Marius, Munteanu, Dan, Tudora, Valeria Neagu & Olteanu, Sandru. 1982. El español de América: Léxico. Bogotá: Instituto Caro y Cuervo.Google Scholar
Salazar, Carmen, Arias, Rafael & de la Vega, Sara L.. 2013. Avanzando: Gramática española y lectura. 7th edn. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Sang, Kim & Tjong, Erik. 2011. How to use Twitter for linguistic research. Tabu 39(1-2). 62-71.Google Scholar
Silva-Corvalán, Carmen. 1994. Language contact and change: Spanish in Los Angeles. (Oxford Studies in Language Contact). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zamora Munné, Juan C. & Guitart, Jorge M.. 1988. Dialectología hispanoamericana. 2nd edn. Salamanca: Publicaciones del Colegio de España.Google Scholar
Zamora Vicente, Alonso. 1985. Dialectología española. 2nd edn. Madrid: Editorial Gredos.Google Scholar