Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-8mjnm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-26T12:58:39.908Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

For You Were Strangers in the Land of Egypt: Clergy, Religiosity, and Public Opinion toward Immigration Reform in the United States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 August 2016

Kevin Wallsten*
Affiliation:
California State University at Long Beach
Tatishe M. Nteta*
Affiliation:
University of Massachusetts at Amherst
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Kevin Wallsten, Department of Political Science, California State University at Long Beach, 1250 Bellflower Blvd., Long Beach, CA 90840-4605. E-mail: kwallste@csulb.edu; or to: Tatishe M. Nteta, Department of Political Science, University of Massachusetts at Amherst, 408 Thompson Tower, Amherst, MA. 01003. E-mail: nteta@polsci.umass.edu.
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Kevin Wallsten, Department of Political Science, California State University at Long Beach, 1250 Bellflower Blvd., Long Beach, CA 90840-4605. E-mail: kwallste@csulb.edu; or to: Tatishe M. Nteta, Department of Political Science, University of Massachusetts at Amherst, 408 Thompson Tower, Amherst, MA. 01003. E-mail: nteta@polsci.umass.edu.

Abstract

Recently, a number of influential clergy leaders have declared their support for liberal immigration reforms. Do the pronouncements of religious leaders influence public opinion on immigration? Using data from a survey experiment embedded in the 2012 Cooperative Congressional Election Study, we find that exposure to the arguments from high profile religious leaders can compel some individuals to reconsider their views on the immigration. To be more precise, we find that Methodists, Southern Baptists, and Evangelical Lutheran Church in America leaders successfully persuaded respondents who identify with these religious denominations to think differently about a path to citizenship and about the plight of undocumented immigrants. Interestingly, we also uncovered that religiosity matters in different ways for how parishioners from different religious faiths react to messages from their leaders. These findings force us to reconsider the impact that an increasingly strident clergy may be having on public opinion in general and on support for immigration reform in particular.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Religion and Politics Section of the American Political Science Association 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

2010 Letter from African American and Hispanic Pastors in Support of Immigration Reform to the President and Members of Congress.Google Scholar
Ansolabehere, Stephen, and Schaffner, Brian. 2012. “CCES Common Content, 2012.” http://hdl.handle.net/1902.1/21447, Harvard Dataverse, V8” (Accessed on September 28, 2014).Google Scholar
Ansolabehere, Stephen, and Schaffner, Brian. 2014. “Does Survey Mode Still Matter? Findings from a 2010 Multi-Mode ComparisonPolitical Analysis 22:285303.Google Scholar
Bloemraad, Irene, Voss, Kim, and Lee, Taeku. 2011. “The Immigration Rallies of 2006: What Were They, How Do We Understand Them, Where Do We Go?” In Rallying for Immigrant Rights: The Fight for Inclusion in 21st Century America. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Bjarnason, Thor, and Welch, Michael R.. 2004. “Father Knows Best: Parishes, Priests and American Catholics’ Attitudes toward Capital Punishment.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 43:103118.Google Scholar
Brader, Ted, Valentino, Nicholas, and Suhay, Elizabeth. 2008. “What Triggers Public Opposition to Immigration? Anxiety, Group Cues, and Immigration Threat.” American Journal of Political Science 52:959978.Google Scholar
Brady, Henry E., and Sniderman, Paul M.. 1985. “Attitude attribution: A group basis for political reasoning.” American Political Science Review 79(4):10611078.Google Scholar
Brambor, Thomas, Roberts Clark, William, and Golder, Matt. 2006. “Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analyses.” Political analysis 14:6382.Google Scholar
Braumoeller, Bear F. 2004. “Hypothesis Testing and Multiplicative Interaction Terms.” International Organization 58:807820.Google Scholar
Brown, R. Khari. 2010. “Religion, Economic Concerns, and African American Immigration Attitudes.” Review for Religious Research 52:146158.Google Scholar
Campbell, David, and Monson, Joseph. 2003. “Follow the Leader? Mormon Voting on Ballot Propositions.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 42:605619.Google Scholar
Carmines, Edward G., and Stimson, James A.. 1980. “The Two Faces of Issue Voting.” The American Political Science Review 74:7897.Google Scholar
Carmines, Edward G., and Stimson, James A.. 1989. “The Two Faces of Issue Voting.” The American Political Science Review 74:7897.Google Scholar
Carmines, Edward G., and Stimson, James A.. 1991. Issue Evolution: Race and the Transformation of American Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Citrin, Jack, Green, Donald, Muste, Christopher, and Wong, Cara. 1997Public Opinion Toward Immigration Reform: The Role of Economic Motivations.” The Journal of Politics 3:858881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Citrin, Jack, and Wright, Matthew. 2009. “Defining the Circle of We: American Identity and Immigration Policy.” The Forum 7:122.Google Scholar
Cohen, Adam, Hall, Daniel, Koenig, Harold, and Meador, Keith. 2005. “Social versus Individual Motivation: Implications for Normative Definitions of Religious Orientation.” Personality and Social Psychology Review 9:4861.Google Scholar
Cooperman, Alan, Smith, Gregory, and Ritchey, Katherine. 2015. “America's Changing Religious Landscape.” Pew Research Center. http://www.pewforum.org/2015/05/12/americas-changing-religious-landscape/ Google Scholar
Djupe, Paul, and Calfano, Brian. 2009. “Justification Not by Faith Alone: Clergy Generating Trust and Certainty by Revealing Thought.” Politics and Religion 2:130.Google Scholar
Djupe, Paul, and Calfano, Brian. 2013. God Talk: Experimenting With The Religious Causes of Public Opinion. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Djupe, Paul, and Gilbert, Christopher. 2003. The Prophetic Pulpit: Clergy, Churches, and Communities in American Politics. New York, NY: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Djupe, Paul, and Gilbert, Christopher. 2009. The Political Influence of Church. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Djupe, Paul, and Gwiasda, G.W.. 2010. “Evangelizing the Environment: Decision Process Effects in Political Persuasion.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 49:7386.Google Scholar
Djupe, Paul, and Hunt, Patrick K.. 2009. “Beyond the Lynn White Thesis: Congregational Effects on Environmental Concern.” Journal of the Scientific Study of Religion 48: 670686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Djupe, Paul, and Neiheisel, Jacob. 2008. “Clergy Deliberation on Gay Rights and Homosexuality.” Polity 40:411435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Djupe, Paul, and Olson, Laura. 2010. “Diffusion of Environmental Concerns in Congregations Across U.S. States.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 10:270301.Google Scholar
Druckman, James N., Jordan, Fein, and Leeper, Thomas J.. 2012. “A Source of Bias in Public Opinion Stability.” American Political Science Review 106:430454.Google Scholar
Dunaway, Johanna, Branton, Regina, and Abrajano, Marisa. 2010. “Agenda Setting, Public Opinion, and the Issue of Immigration Reform.” Social Science Quarterly 91:359378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fetzer, Joel. 2001. “Shaping Pacifism: The Role of the Local Anabaptist Pastor.” In Christian Clergy in American Politics, eds. Crawford, Sue E.S., and Olson, Laura R.. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Gerber, Alan, Arceneaux, Kevin, Boudreau, Cheryl, Dowling, Conor, Hillygus, Sunshine, Palfrey, Thomas, Biggers, Daniel, and Henry, D.J.. 2014. “Reporting Guidelines for Experimental Research: A Report from the Experimental Research Standards Committee.” Journal of Experimental Political Science 1:8198.Google Scholar
Gilbert, Christopher P. 1993. The Impact of Churches on Political Behavior: An Empirical Study. Westport, CT: Greenwood.Google Scholar
Gidengil, Elisabeth, Giles, Janine, and Thomas, Melanee. 2008. “The Gender Gap in Self-Perceived Understanding of Politics in Canada and the United States.” Politics & Gender 4:535561.Google Scholar
Gomez, Jose. 2013. “Evangelical, Other Faith Leaders Press for Immigration Reform in Meeting With President” http://evangelicalimmigrationtable.com/press-release-evangelical-other-faith-leaders-press-for-immigration-reform-in-meeting-with-president/ (Accessed on December 31, 2015).Google Scholar
Goodstein, Laurie. 2010. “Obama Wins Unlikely Allies in Immigration.” http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/19/us/politics/19evangelicals.html (Accessed on December 31, 2015).Google Scholar
Green, John C. 2007. The Faith Factor: How Religion Influences American Elections. Hartford, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Hadaway, C. Kirk, Marler, Penny, and Chaves, Mark. 1993. “What the Polls Don't Show: A Closer Look at U.S. Church Attendance.” American Sociological Review 58:741752.Google Scholar
Hadaway, C. Kirk, Marler, Penny, and Chaves, Mark. 1998. “Overreporting Church Attendance in America: Evidence that Demands the Same Verdict.” American Sociological Review 63:122130.Google Scholar
Hainmueller, Jens, and Hiscox, Michael. 2010Attitudes toward Highly Skilled and Low-skilled Immigration: Evidence from a Survey Experiment.” American Political Science Review 104:624624.Google Scholar
Hainmueller, Jens, and Hopkins, Daniel. 2015. “The Hidden American Immigration Consensus: A Conjoint Analysis of Attitudes toward Immigrants.” American Journal of Political Science 59:529548.Google Scholar
Hopkins, Dan. 2010Politicized places: Explaining Where and When Immigrants Provoke Local Opposition.” American Political Science Review 104:4060.Google Scholar
Huckfeldt, Robert, Plutzer, Eric, and Sprague, John. 1993. “Alternative Contexts of Political Behavior: Churches, Neighborhoods, and Individuals.” Journal of Politics 55:365.Google Scholar
Huckfeldt, Robert, and Sprague, John. 1995. Citizens, Politics, and Social Communication: Information and Influence in an Election Campaign. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jelen, Ted. 1993. “The Political Consequences of Religious Group Attitudes.” The Journal of Politics 55:178190.Google Scholar
Kam, Cindy, and Franzese, Robert. 2009. Modeling and Interpreting Interactive Hypotheses in Regression Analysis. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Karp, Jeffrey A. 1998. “The Influence of Elite Endorsements in Initiative Campaigns.” Citizens as Legislators, eds. Bowler, Shaun, Todd Donovan, and Caroline Tolbert. Columbus, OH: Ohio University Press, 149165.Google Scholar
Kinder, Donald, and Kam, Cindy. 2010. Us Against Them: Ethnocentric Foundations of American Opinion. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Knezevic, Andrea. 2008. “Overlapping Confidence Intervals and Statistical Significance.” https://www.cscu.cornell.edu/news/statnews/stnews73.pdf (Accessed on April 19, 2016).Google Scholar
Knoll, Benjamin R. 2009. “And Who is My Neighbor? Religion and Immigration Policy Attitudes.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 48:313331.Google Scholar
Layman, Geoffrey C. 1997. “Religion and Political Behavior in the United States: The Impact Of Beliefs, Affiliations, And Commitment from 1980 to 1994.” Public Opinion Quarterly 61:288316.Google Scholar
Layman, Geoffrey. 2001. The Great Divide: Religious and Cultural Conflict in American Party Politics. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Lee, Taeku. 2002. Mobilizing Public Opinion: Black Insurgency and the Civil Rights Movement. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Leege, David. 1996. “Religiosity Measures in the National Election Studies: A Guide to Their Use, Part 2.” Votes and Opinions 2:3336.Google Scholar
Malhotra, Neil, Margalit, Yotam, and Hyunjung Mo, Cecilia. 2013. “Economic Explanations for Opposition to Immigration: Distinguishing between Prevalence and Conditional Impact.” American Journal of Political Science 57:391.Google Scholar
Marrow, Helen. 2011. New Destination Dreaming: Immigration, Race, and Legal Status in the Rural American South. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Mockabee, Stephen, Monson, Joseph, and Grant, J. Tobin. 2001. “Measuring Religious Commitment Among Catholics and Protestants: A New Approach.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 40:675690.Google Scholar
Newman, Benjamin J. 2013. “Acculturating Contexts and Anglo Opposition to Immigration in the U.S.” American Journal of Political Science 57:374390.Google Scholar
Nteta, Tatishe. 2013United We Stand? African Americans, Self Interest, and Immigration Reform.” American Politics Research 41:147172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nteta, Tatishe, and Wallsten, Kevin. 2012. “Preaching to the Choir? Religious Leaders and American Opinion on Immigration Reform.” Social Science Quarterly 93:891910.Google Scholar
Paul, David, and Brown, Clyde. 2001. “Testing the Limits of Elite Influence on Public Opinion: An Examination of Sports Facility Referendums.” Political Research Quarterly 54:871888.Google Scholar
Payton, Mark E., Greenstone, Matthew H., and Schenker, Nathaniel. 2003. “Overlapping Confidence Intervals or Standard Error Intervals: What Do They Mean in Terms of Statistical Significance?Journal of Insect Science 3:34.Google Scholar
Pew Research Center. 2010. Religion & Public Life Survey. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.Google Scholar
Presser, Stanley, and Stinson, Linda. 1998. “Data Collection Mode and Social Desirability Bias in Self Reported Religious Attendance.” American Sociological Review 63:137145.Google Scholar
Prior, Markus. 2009. “Improving Media Effects Research through Better Measurement of News Exposure.” Journal of Politics 71:893908.Google Scholar
Scheve, Kenneth, and Slaughter, Matthew. 2001. “Labor Market Competition and Individual Preferences Over Immigration Policy.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 83:133145.Google Scholar
Schildkraut, Deborah. 2011. Americanism in the Twenty-First Century: Public Opinion in the Age of Immigration. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sniderman, Paul, Brody, Richard, and Tetlock, Philip. 1991. Reasoning and Choice: Explorations in Political Psychology. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sniderman, Paul, Hagendoorn, Louk, and Prior, Markus. 2004. “Predisposing Factors and Situational Triggers: Exclusionary Reactions To Immigrant Minorities.” American Political Science Review 98:3549.Google Scholar
Smith, Gregory. 2008. Politics in the Parish: The Political Influence of Catholic Priests. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Smidt, Corwin. ed. 2004. Pulpit and Politics: Clergy in American Politics at the Advent of the Millennium. Waco, TX: Baylor University Press.Google Scholar
Southern Baptist Convention. 2011. On Immigration and the Gospel. Nashville, TN: Southern Baptist Convention.Google Scholar
Strode, Tom. 2011. “Resolutions: SBC Tackles Immigration, NIV.” Baptist Press.Google Scholar
Wald, Kenneth D., Owen, Dennis E., and Hill, Samuel S.. 1988. ‘‘Churches as Political Communities.’’ American Political Science Review 82:531548.Google Scholar
Wallsten, Kevin, and Nteta, Tatishe M.. 2016. “Race, Partisanship, and Perceptions of Inter-minority Commonality.” Politics, Groups, and Identities: 123. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/21565503.2016.1164065?journalCode=rpgi20 (Accessed on July 20, 2016).Google Scholar
Wald, Kenneth, and Calhoun Brown, Allison. 2010. Religion and Politics in the United States. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
Welch, Michael R., and Leege, David C.. 1988. “Religious Predictors of Catholic Parishioners’ Sociopolitical Attitudes: Devotional Style, Closeness to God, Imagery, and Agentic/Communal Religious Identity.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 27:536552.Google Scholar
Zaller, John. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar