Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-15T13:56:46.864Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Laboratory astrophysics with laser-driven strong magnetic fields in China

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2016

Fei-Lu Wang
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Optical Astronomy, National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100012, China
Xiao-Xing Pei
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Optical Astronomy, National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100012, China University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
Bo Han
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Optical Astronomy, National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100012, China University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
Hui-Gang Wei
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Optical Astronomy, National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100012, China
Da-Wei Yuan
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Optical Astronomy, National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100012, China
Gui-Yun Liang
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Optical Astronomy, National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100012, China
Gang Zhao*
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Optical Astronomy, National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100012, China University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
Jia-Yong Zhong
Affiliation:
Department of Astronomy, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
Zhe Zhang
Affiliation:
Beijing National Laboratory of Condensed Matter Physics, Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
Bao-Jun Zhu
Affiliation:
Beijing National Laboratory of Condensed Matter Physics, Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
Yan-Fei Li
Affiliation:
Beijing National Laboratory of Condensed Matter Physics, Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
Fang Li
Affiliation:
Beijing National Laboratory of Condensed Matter Physics, Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
Yu-Tong Li*
Affiliation:
Beijing National Laboratory of Condensed Matter Physics, Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
Si-Liang Zeng
Affiliation:
Institute of Applied Physics and Computational Mathematics, Beijing, 100088, China
Shi-Yang Zou
Affiliation:
Institute of Applied Physics and Computational Mathematics, Beijing, 100088, China
Jie Zhang*
Affiliation:
Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
*
Correspondence to:  G. Zhao, Key Laboratory of Optical Astronomy, National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100012, China, Email: gzhao@bao.ac.cn; Jie Zhang, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China, Email: jzhang1@sjtu.edu.cn; Yutong Li, Beijing National Laboratory of Condensed Matter Physics, Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China, Email: ytli@iphy.ac.cn
Correspondence to:  G. Zhao, Key Laboratory of Optical Astronomy, National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100012, China, Email: gzhao@bao.ac.cn; Jie Zhang, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China, Email: jzhang1@sjtu.edu.cn; Yutong Li, Beijing National Laboratory of Condensed Matter Physics, Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China, Email: ytli@iphy.ac.cn
Correspondence to:  G. Zhao, Key Laboratory of Optical Astronomy, National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100012, China, Email: gzhao@bao.ac.cn; Jie Zhang, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China, Email: jzhang1@sjtu.edu.cn; Yutong Li, Beijing National Laboratory of Condensed Matter Physics, Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China, Email: ytli@iphy.ac.cn

Abstract

In this paper, the recent studies of laboratory astrophysics with strong magnetic fields in China have been reviewed. On the Shenguang-II laser facility of the National Laboratory on High-Power Lasers and Physics, a laser-driven strong magnetic field up to 200 T has been achieved. The experiment was performed to model the interaction of solar wind with dayside magnetosphere. Also the low beta plasma magnetic reconnection (MR) has been studied. Theoretically, the model has been developed to deal with the atomic structures and processes in strong magnetic field. Also the study of shock wave generation in the magnetized counter-streaming plasmas is introduced.

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2016

1 Magnetic-field generation in the laboratory

Laboratory generation of strong magnetic fields is of significance to many research fields including plasma and beam physics[Reference Sagdeev1], astrophysics[Reference Santangelo, Segreto, Giarrusso, Dal Fiume, Orlandini, Parmar, Oosterbroek, Bulik, Mihara, Campana, Israel and Stella2], material science[Reference Kojima, Miyata, Motome, Ueda, Ueda and Takeyama3], and atomic and molecular physics[Reference Gilch, Pollinger-Dammer, Musewald, Michel-Beyerle and Steiner4], and so forth. In the aspect of astrophysics, a high magnetic field is related to many high-energy astrophenomena, such as the jet formation[Reference Albertazzi, Ciardi, Nakatsutsumi, Vinci, Beard, Bonito, Billette, Borghesi, Burkley, Chen, Cowan, Herrmannsdorfer, Higginson, Kroll, Pikuz, Naughton, Romagnani, Riconda, Revet, Riquier, Schlenvoigt, Skobelev, Faenov, Soloviev, Huarte-Espinosa, Frank, Portugall, Pepin and Fuchs5], magnetic reconnection (MR)[Reference Masuda, Kosugi, Hara and Ogawara6, Reference Zhong, Li, Wang, Wang, Dong, Xiao, Wang, Liu, Zhang, An, Wang, Zhu, Gu, He, Zhao and Zhang7] and collisionless shock formations. Laboratory generation of strong magnetic fields makes it possible to study them in a new regime and controllable way.

A laser-driven strong magnetic field up to 200 T has been demonstrated on the Shenguang-II (SG-II) laser facility of the National Laboratory on High-Power Lasers and Physics. The basic scheme is to produce strong magnetic fields from the cold electron flow in a laser irradiated open-ended coil[Reference Zhu, Li, Yuan, Li, Li, Liao, Zhao, Zhong, Xue, He, Wang, Lu, Zhang, Yang, Zhou, Xie, Hong, Wei, Zhang, Han, Pei, Liu, Zhang, Wang, Zhu, Gu, Zhao, Zhang, Zhao and Zhang8]. Compared with the previous generation of magnetic fields driven by fast electron current in a capacitor-coil target[Reference Fujioka, Zhang, Ishihara, Shigemori, Hironaka, Johzaki, Sunahara, Yamamoto, Nakashima, Watanabe, Shiraga, Nishimura and Azechi9], the generation mechanism of the magnetic field is straightforward and the coil is easy to be fabricated.

The experiment layout is shown in Figure 1. Eight SG-II beams with total energy of 2 kJ in 1 ns were focused on a planar plate attached on the end of the open-ended coil. During the laser irradiating the planar plate, fast electrons were generated and expelled out from the laser focal spot. This would lead to a high electrostatic potential grown up near the laser focus and charged the target. The potential dragged the background cold electrons to the focus to neutralize the target. This cold electron current in the target coil would create a strong magnetic-field pulse. The strength of the magnetic field was measured by a pre-calibrated B-dot.

Figure 1. Schematic view of the experimental setup at the Shenguang-II laser facility. Eight laser beams at 351 nm were divided into two bunches and focused onto both sides of the planar plate simultaneously.

Table 1. Summary of magnetic-field strength, and current in the coil.

The laser parameters, magnetic-field strength, current and energy conversion efficiency, are all summarized in Table 1. The field strength at the coil center, $B_{\text{center}}$, is generally increases as a function of $I\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}^{2}$. The $B_{\text{center}}$ reaches a maximum value of 205 T, at the highest $I\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}^{2}$ of $6.85\times 10^{14}~\text{W}~\text{cm}^{-2}~\unicode[STIX]{x03BC}\text{m}^{2}$. The conversion efficiency from laser energy to magnetic field is about 1% in this experiment.

2 Magnetic reconnection

MR is a universal physical process in plasmas, in which the stored magnetic energy is converted into high-velocity flows and energetic particles[Reference Yamada10, Reference Zweibel and Yamada11]. The model of MR is widely applied in astrophysics, including investigations on solar flares[Reference Sweet and Lehnert12, Reference Parker13], star formation[Reference Kulsrud14], the coupling of solar wind with earth magnetosphere, accretion disks and Gamma-ray bursts[Reference Goodman and Uzdensky15], and so forth. The process of MR has been studied in detail by dedicated magnetic-driven experiments[Reference Yamada, Yamada, Kulsrud and Ji16]. Based on the quasi-steady state of the self-generated magnetic fields in laser plasmas, we reconstruct the topology of MR and model the loop-top x-ray source[Reference Zhong, Li, Wang, Wang, Dong, Xiao, Wang, Liu, Zhang, An, Wang, Zhu, Gu, He, Zhao and Zhang7], the interaction of solar wind with dayside magnetosphere[Reference Zhang, Zhong, Wang, Pei, Wei, Yuan, Yang, Wang, Li, Han, Yin, Liao, Fang, Yang, Yuan, Sakawa, Morita, Cao, Jiang, Ding, Kuramitsu, Liang, Wang, Li, Zhu, Zhang and Zhao 17] in the laboratory by using SG-II laser facility. The two MR processes modeled in laboratory are shown in Figure 2 as follows.

Figure 2(a) shows a cartoon simulation of the solar flares and the coupling of solar wind with earth magnetosphere. Figure 2(b) shows the x-ray image of laser-driven MR which is designed to be similar to the scheme of a loop-top x-ray source in the solar flares. The reconnection plasma produced on the aluminum (Al) target with two laser beams, and the downward outflow will interact with a preset copper (Cu) target. Two bright x-ray spots are clearly observed due to the laser heating the Al foil target where two laser spots are separated by $600~\unicode[STIX]{x03BC}\text{m}$. The most striking feature in the image is that a bright x-ray spot at the center of the Cu target is observed just below the downward outflow/jet. The position and the arc shape of the spot are the solid evidence that high speed outflow/jet on the Al foil impacting the plasma generated on the Cu target, a picture clearly resembling the loop-top x-ray source in solar flare observations.

Figure 2. (a) Shows a cartoon simulating the solar flares and the coupling of solar wind with earth magnetosphere. (b) MR model for the loop-top x-ray source, x-ray images taken with Pinhole camera in the experiment. (c) MR model for the interaction of solar wind with magnetosphere, one micro-solar-flare is produced by two intense laser beams interacting with a solid aluminum block, and the outflow interacts with a preset permanent magnetic pole.

Following previous one, another experiment was performed to model the interaction of solar wind with dayside magnetosphere. Figure 2(c) shows the schematic experimental setup and x-ray image for laser-driven MR. One micro-solar-flare[Reference Zhong, Li, Wang, Wang, Dong, Xiao, Wang, Liu, Zhang, An, Wang, Zhu, Gu, He, Zhao and Zhang7] is produced by two intense laser beams interacting with a solid aluminum block. The magnetized outflowing plasma is evident between two plasma bubbles and is used to interact with a preset permanent magnetic pole, then further models dynamic processes in Solar-Earth space. Scaling law shows the present study will be helpful for understanding Solar-Earth space dynamic phenomena. The traces of high-energy electrons are also found moving along with the magnetic separatrix.

Furthermore, we have studied the low beta plasma MR in our recent experiment. This is the first laboratory study of MR with an explicitly controlled magnetic-field environment produced by capacitor-coil target[Reference Fujioka, Fujioka, Zhang, Ishihara, Shigemori, Hironaka, Johzaki, Sunahara, Yamamoto, Nakashima, Watanabe, Shiraga, Nishimura and Azechi18]. The magnetic field measured in laboratory is about dozens of Tesla. Under such strong magnetic-field environment, we have measured the MR outflow. The result proves indirectly the existence of a reconnection-induced electric field in a low beta MR, which could show potential applications in astrophysics and plasma physics, such as the study of reconnection in solar and magnetotail flares.

3 Spectra of plasma with strong magnetic field related to astrophysical objects

Magnetic fields are widely existed in universe, from the interior of stars to the astrophysical interstellar medium (ISM). For example, in x-ray binaries the magnetic-field strengths of accreting neutron stars could be larger than $10^{8}~\text{T}$ by observing the cyclotron features as Figure 3 shows. Here four harmonic features were observed, which are interpreted in terms of the four harmonically spaced lines of cyclotron resonant features in a strong magnetic field[Reference Santangelo, Segreto, Giarrusso, Dal Fiume, Orlandini, Parmar, Oosterbroek, Bulik, Mihara, Campana, Israel and Stella2].

Figure 3. Unfolded spectrum of the descending edge of the main peak of X0115$+$63[Reference Santangelo, Segreto, Giarrusso, Dal Fiume, Orlandini, Parmar, Oosterbroek, Bulik, Mihara, Campana, Israel and Stella2].

The atomic structures and processes in strong magnetic field have been studied theoretically by various methods, such as finite element[Reference Shertzer19], Kantorvich[Reference Dimova, Kaschiev and Vinitsky20], semi-classical closed orbit theory[Reference Dimova, Kaschiev and Vinitsky20], finite basis expansion[Reference Zhao and Stancil21] and power series expansion[Reference Kravchenko, Liberman and Johansson22]. Those calculations of the electron wavefunctions are very complicated and hard to be applied to the combination of B- and E-fields. The coulomb wavefunction discrete variable presentation method (CWDVR) is a simple and highly accurate method of investigating the behavior of atomic system in a strong magnetic field up to $B\sim 2.35\times 10^{9}~\text{T}$[Reference Zeng, Zou and Yan23].

Recently, extremely strong magnetic field can be generated using high-power laser in laboratory. Those magnetic fields can be up to thousand Tesla[Reference Fujioka, Fujioka, Zhang, Ishihara, Shigemori, Hironaka, Johzaki, Sunahara, Yamamoto, Nakashima, Watanabe, Shiraga, Nishimura and Azechi18]. Thus, it is very interesting to investigate the properties of matters related to the astrophysics under such a strong magnetic field. Atomic levels are shifted and split in strong magnetic field, which would certainly introduce changes in the opacity of matters. Measurements of the opacity under strong magnetic field are in progress with SG-II laser facility. Effects of the strong magnetic on opacities will be investigated. The results would benefit on the understanding of the energy transport in astrophysics. It could also be a potential candidate to solve the present problems on the opacity in solar convection zones[Reference Bailey, Nagayama, Loisel, Rochau, Blancard, Colgan, Cosse, Faussurier, Fontes, Gilleron, Golovkin, Hansen, Iglesias, Kilcrease, MacFarlane, Mancini, Nahar, Orban, Pain, Pradhan, Sherrill and Wilson24].

4 Studying shock wave generation in magnetized counter-streaming plasmas

Energetic particles are ubiquitous in astrophysical plasmas. However, the physical acceleration process is not well understood. The most remarkable example is the solar energetic particles[Reference Vourlidas, Howard, Esfandiari, Patsourakos, Yashiro and Michalek25]. The kinetic energies of the ejected particles are up to ${\sim}10^{25}~\text{J}$, which are believed to be the most explosive events in the Solar System. Recently, astro-observation[Reference Carley, Long, Byrne, Zucca, Bloomfield, McCauley and Gallagher26] shows that particle acceleration is associated with shock wave, which is driven by the eruption of magnetized plasmoids, called coronal mass ejections (CMEs). Studying the shock wave generation in the magnetized plasmas is important to understand the shock wave acceleration in the Solar System.

The scaled-down and controllable laboratory experiments, as an accessory to the astronomical observations, can closely study the collisionless shock wave using high-power lasers. Counter-streaming plasmas system is a test bed for studying such phenomena in laboratory[Reference Yuan and Li27]. Previous SG-II experiments have successfully generated shock wave using unmagnetized counter-streaming plasmas[Reference Liu, Li, Zhang, Zhong, Zheng, Dong, Chen, Zhao, Sakawa, Morita, Kuramitsu, Kato, Chen, Lu, Ma, Wang, Sheng, Takabe, Rhee, Ding, Jiang, Liu, Zhu and Zhang28Reference Morita, Sakawa, Kuramitsu, Dono, Aoki, Tanji, Kato, Li, Zhang, Liu, Zhong, Takabe and Zhang30]. In order to generate magnetized plasmas to study the shock wave driven by the CMEs, we plan to add a kilo-Tesla level magnetic field induced by the capacitor-coil target[Reference Fujioka, Fujioka, Zhang, Ishihara, Shigemori, Hironaka, Johzaki, Sunahara, Yamamoto, Nakashima, Watanabe, Shiraga, Nishimura and Azechi18] into the counter-streaming plasmas system. Assuming the average state of ionization $Z=6$, the velocity of the streams $V=1000~\text{km}~\text{s}^{-1}$, and the strength of B-field $B=1000~\text{T}$, the ion cyclotron radius can be estimated as $r\sim 20~\unicode[STIX]{x03BC}\text{m}$, which is smaller than the system scale $L=4.5~\text{mm}$. The electron cyclotron radius is much smaller than the ion’s, because of the larger charge-to-mass ratio. The conditions can ensure that it is suitable to study shock wave driven by the magnetized plasmas in laboratory.

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) under grant No. 2013CBA01503, and the National Natural Science Foundation of China under grant No. 11573040, 11503041 and 11135012. Also supported by the Science Challenge Program.

References

Sagdeev, R. Z. Rev. Plasma Phys. 4, 23 (1966).Google Scholar
Santangelo, A. Segreto, A. Giarrusso, S. Dal Fiume, D. Orlandini, M. Parmar, A. N. Oosterbroek, T. Bulik, T. Mihara, T. Campana, S. Israel, G. L. and Stella, L. Astrophys. J. 523, L85 (1999).Google Scholar
Kojima, E. Miyata, A. Motome, Y. Ueda, H. Ueda, Y. and Takeyama, S. J. Low Temp. Phys. 159, 3 (2010).Google Scholar
Gilch, P. Pollinger-Dammer, F. Musewald, C. Michel-Beyerle, M. E. and Steiner, U. E. Science 281, 982 (1998).Google Scholar
Albertazzi, R. Ciardi, A. Nakatsutsumi, M. Vinci, T. Beard, J. Bonito, R. Billette, J. Borghesi, M. Burkley, Z. Chen, S. N. Cowan, T. E. Herrmannsdorfer, T. Higginson, D. P. Kroll, F. Pikuz, S. A. Naughton, K. Romagnani, L. Riconda, C. Revet, G. Riquier, R. Schlenvoigt, H. P. Skobelev, I. Y. Faenov, A. Y. Soloviev, A. Huarte-Espinosa, M. Frank, A. Portugall, O. Pepin, H. and Fuchs, J. Science 346, 325 (2014).Google Scholar
Masuda, S. Kosugi, T. Hara, H. and Ogawara, Y. Nature 371, 495 (1994).Google Scholar
Zhong, J. Y. Li, Y. T. Wang, X. G. Wang, J. Q. Dong, Q. L. Xiao, C. J. Wang, S. J. Liu, X. Zhang, L. An, L. Wang, F. L. Zhu, J. Q. Gu, Y. A. He, X. T. Zhao, G. and Zhang, J. Nat. Phys. 6, 984 (2010).Google Scholar
Zhu, B. J. Li, Y. T. Yuan, D. W. Li, Y. F. Li, F. Liao, G. Q. Zhao, J. R. Zhong, J. Y. Xue, F. B. He, S. K. Wang, W. W. Lu, F. Zhang, F. Q. Yang, L. Zhou, K. N. Xie, N. Hong, W. Wei, H. G. Zhang, K. Han, B. Pei, X. X. Liu, C. Zhang, Z. Wang, W. M. Zhu, J. Q. Gu, Y. Q. Zhao, Z. Q. Zhang, B. H. Zhao, G. and Zhang, J. Appl. Phys. Lett. 107, 261903 (2015).Google Scholar
Fujioka, S. Zhang, Z. Ishihara, K. Shigemori, K. Hironaka, Y. Johzaki, T. Sunahara, A. Yamamoto, N. Nakashima, H. Watanabe, T. Shiraga, H. Nishimura, H. and Azechi, H. Sci. Rep. 3, 1170 (2013).Google Scholar
Yamada, M. Phys. Plasmas 14, 058102 (2007).Google Scholar
Zweibel, E. and Yamada, M. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 47, 291 (2009).Google Scholar
Sweet, P. A. in IAUsymp.6, Lehnert, B.  (ed.) (Cambridge University Press, 1958), p. 123.Google Scholar
Parker, E. N. J. Geophys. Res. 62, 509 (1957).Google Scholar
Kulsrud, R. M. Phys. Plasmas 5, 1599 (1998).Google Scholar
Goodman, J. and Uzdensky, D. Astrophys. J. 688, 555 (2008).Google Scholar
Yamada, M. Yamada, M. Kulsrud, R. and Ji, H. Rev. Modern Phys. 82, 603 (2010).Google Scholar
Zhang, K. Zhong, J. Y. Wang, J. Q. Pei, X. X. Wei, H. G. Yuan, D. W. Yang, Z. W. Wang, C. Li, F. Han, B. Yin, C. L. Liao, G. Q. Fang, Y. Yang, S. Yuan, X. H. Sakawa, Y. Morita, T. Cao, Z. R. Jiang, S. E. Ding, Y. K. Kuramitsu, Y. Liang, G. Y. Wang, F. L. Li, Y. T. Zhu, J. Q. Zhang, J. and Zhao , G. High Energy Density Phys. 17, 32 (2015).Google Scholar
Fujioka, S. Fujioka, S. Zhang, Z. Ishihara, K. Shigemori, K. Hironaka, Y. Johzaki, T. Sunahara, A. Yamamoto, N. Nakashima, H. Watanabe, T. Shiraga, H. Nishimura, H. and Azechi, H. Sci. Rep. 3, 1170 (2015).Google Scholar
Shertzer, J. Phys. Rev. A 39, 38333835 (1989).Google Scholar
Dimova, M. G. Kaschiev, M. S. and Vinitsky, S. I. J. Phys. B 38, 2337 (2005).Google Scholar
Zhao, L. B. and Stancil, P. C. J. Phys. B 40, 4347 (2007).Google Scholar
Kravchenko, Y. P. Liberman, M. A. and Johansson, B. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 619 (1996).Google Scholar
Zeng, S. L. Zou, S. and Yan, J. Chin. Phys. Lett. 26, 053202 (2009).Google Scholar
Bailey, J. E. Nagayama, T. Loisel, G. P. Rochau, G. A. Blancard, C. Colgan, J. Cosse, Ph. Faussurier, G. Fontes, C. J. Gilleron, F. Golovkin, I. Hansen, S. B. Iglesias, C. A. Kilcrease, D. P. MacFarlane, J. J. Mancini, R. C. Nahar, S. N. Orban, C. Pain, J.-C. Pradhan, A. K. Sherrill, M. and Wilson, B. G. Nature 517, 56 (2015).Google Scholar
Vourlidas, A. Howard, R. A. Esfandiari, E. Patsourakos, S. Yashiro, S. and Michalek, G. Astrophys. J. 722, 1522 (2010).Google Scholar
Carley, E. P. Long, D. M. Byrne, J. P. Zucca, P. Bloomfield, D. S. McCauley, J. and Gallagher, P. T. Nat. Phys. 9, 811 (2013).Google Scholar
Yuan, D. and Li, Y. Chin. Phys. B 24, 015204 (2015).Google Scholar
Liu, X. Li, Y. T. Zhang, Y. Zhong, J. Y. Zheng, W. D. Dong, Q. L. Chen, M. Zhao, G. Sakawa, Y. Morita, T. Kuramitsu, Y. Kato, T. N. Chen, L. M. Lu, X. Ma, J. L. Wang, W. M. Sheng, Z. M. Takabe, H. Rhee, Y.-J. Ding, Y. K. Jiang, S. E. Liu, S. Y. Zhu, J. Q. and Zhang, J. New J. Phys. 13, 093001 (2011).Google Scholar
Yuan, D. W. Li, Y. T. Liu, X. Zhang, Y. Zhong, J. Y. Zheng, W. D. Dong, Q. L. Chen, M. Sakawa, Y. Morita, T. Kuramitsu, Y. Kato, T. N. Takabe, H. Rhee, Y.-J. Zhu, J. Q. Zhao, G. and Zhang, J. High Energy Density Phys. 9, 239 (2013).Google Scholar
Morita, T. Sakawa, Y. Kuramitsu, Y. Dono, S. Aoki, H. Tanji, H. Kato, T. N. Li, Y. T. Zhang, Y. Liu, X. Zhong, J. Y. Takabe, H. and Zhang, J. Phys. Plasmas 17, 122702 (2010).Google Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1. Schematic view of the experimental setup at the Shenguang-II laser facility. Eight laser beams at 351 nm were divided into two bunches and focused onto both sides of the planar plate simultaneously.

Figure 1

Table 1. Summary of magnetic-field strength, and current in the coil.

Figure 2

Figure 2. (a) Shows a cartoon simulating the solar flares and the coupling of solar wind with earth magnetosphere. (b) MR model for the loop-top x-ray source, x-ray images taken with Pinhole camera in the experiment. (c) MR model for the interaction of solar wind with magnetosphere, one micro-solar-flare is produced by two intense laser beams interacting with a solid aluminum block, and the outflow interacts with a preset permanent magnetic pole.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Unfolded spectrum of the descending edge of the main peak of X0115$+$63[2].