Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T14:54:39.294Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Intersection of ‘Live’ and ‘Real-time’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 June 2016

Kerry L. Hagan*
Affiliation:
Digital Media and Arts Research Centre, Department of Computer Science and Information Systems, CS1025, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland

Abstract

Real-time computer music is now common and ubiquitous, no longer a new or experimental practice. In its infancy, it helped to solve perceived issues with the fixity of tape pieces, a natural continuation in the practice of live electronics. However, real-time computer music did not have the same consequences as live electronic music. This situation engendered many discussions about the liveness of real-time computer music performances at the time. It is now 20 years past those first conversations, and it is important to revisit what is ‘live’ and how it applies to real-time musics. Additionally, in some ways, the language surrounding descriptions of fixed medium works, mixed works, live electronics and real-time computer music has evolved and, perhaps, even settled into conventions distinguishing musical approach and philosophies. This article first defines the language, not to proselytise, but rather to ground the argument. The conclusion asserts that liveness is a spectrum despite the fact that ‘live’ is often used categorically. Though one may have an intuitive understanding of what constitutes a ‘live’ event, this article explicitly articulates the most significantly contributive factors. The nature of real-time computer music is explored in relation to these factors of liveness. Using musical examples, this article shows that ‘real-time’ music does not guarantee a ‘live’ performance, contrary to what is typically held to be true. Instead, ‘real-time’ simply becomes a descriptor of compositional method, and any real-time work can exist along a broad range of the liveness spectrum.

Type
Articles
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Agostini, A. and Ghisi, D. 2013. Real-Time Computer-Aided Composition with bach . Contemporary Music Review 32(1): 4148.Google Scholar
Antescofo. 2007. http://repmus.ircam.fr/antescofo (accessed 7 April 2016).Google Scholar
Burns, C. 2002. Realizing Lucier and Stockhausen: Case Studies in the Performance Practice of Electroacoustic Music. Journal of New Music Research 31(1): 5968.Google Scholar
Collins, N. 1990. Liner notes. On I am sitting in a room. New York: Lovely Music, LCD 1013.Google Scholar
Collins, N. 2003. Generative Music and Laptop Performance. Contemporary Music Review 22(3): 6779.Google Scholar
Emmerson, S. 1994. ‘Live’ Versus ‘Real-time’. Contemporary Music Review 10(2): 95101.Google Scholar
Emmerson, S. 2007. Living Electronic Music. Hampshire: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, P. 2000. The New Gendyn Program. Computer Music Journal 24(2): 3138.Google Scholar
Garnett, G. E. 2001. The Aesthetics of Interactive Computer Music. Computer Music Journal: Aesthetics in Computer Music 25(1): 2133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, G. E. 2000. Too Many Notes: Computers, Complexity and Culture in Voyager . Leonardo Music Journal 10: 3339.Google Scholar
Lucier, A. 1995. I Am Sitting in a Room: For Voice and Electromagnetic Tape (1970). In Reflections/Reflexionen. Köln: MusikTexte.Google Scholar
Manoury, P. 2013. Compositional Procedures in. Tensio Contemporary Music Review 32(1): 6197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNutt, E. 2003. Performing Electroacoustic Music: A Wider View of Interactivity. Organised Sound 8(3): 297304.Google Scholar
Pd Repertory Project. 2007. http://msp.ucsd.edu/pdrp/latest/files/doc/ (accessed 7 April 2016).Google Scholar
Puckette, M. 2001. New Public-Domain Realizations of Standard Pieces for Instruments and Live Electronics. Proceedings, International Computer Music Conference. San Francisco: ICMA.Google Scholar
Puckette, M. 2004. A Divide Between ‘Compositional’ and ‘Performative’ Aspects of Pd. Proceedings of First International Pd Convention . Graz, Austria, September.Google Scholar
Rowe, R. 1999. The Aesthetics of Interactive Music Systems. Contemporary Music Review 18(3): 8387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schrader, B. 1991. Live/electro-acoustic Music: A Perspective from History and California. Contemporary Music Review 6(1): 91106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seleborg, C. 2004. Interaction temps-réel/temps différé. Marseille: mémoire ATIAM.Google Scholar
Stroppa, M. 1999. Live Electronics or … Live Music? Towards a Critique of Interaction. Contemporary Music Review 18(3): 4177.Google Scholar
Tarantino, T. nd. Alvin Lucier: I Am Sitting in a Room (1969). http://toddtarantino.com/hum/lucier_iamsitting.html (accessed 27 May 2014).Google Scholar
Xenakis, I. 1992. Formalized Music: Thought and Mathematics in Composition, rev. edn. Harmonologia Series no.6. New York: Pendragon Press.Google Scholar

Discography

Lewis, G. E. 1993. Voyager (1993). On Voyager. Tokyo: Disk Union, AVAN 014.Google Scholar
Lucier, A. 1990. I Am Sitting in a Room (1970). On I Am Sitting in a Room. New York: Lovely Music, LCD 1013.Google Scholar
Wishart, T. 2007. Fabulous Paris (1997). No label.Google Scholar
Xenakis, I. 1994. Gendy 3 (1991). On Iannis Xenakis: Aïs – Gendy3 – Taurhiphanie – Thalleïn. Massachussetts: Neuma Records, NEUMA 450-86.Google Scholar
Xenakis, I. 2001. Pithoprakta (1955–56). On Xenakis: Metastasis Pithoprakta Eonta. Germany: Le Chant du Monde, LDC 278368.Google Scholar
Xenakis, I. 2005. Syrmos (1959). On Iannis Xenakis: Music for Strings. New York: Mode, MODE 152.Google Scholar