Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T20:24:04.281Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Trace fossils of possible parasites inside the gut contents of a hadrosaurid dinosaur, Upper Cretaceous Judith River Formation, Montana

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 June 2016

Justin Tweet ,
Karen Chin  and
A. A. Ekdale
Justin Tweet
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences, University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309, USA 〈jtweet.nps.paleo@gmail.com〉
Karen Chin
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences and Museum of Natural History, University of Colorado at Boulder, 265 UCB, Boulder, CO 80309, USA, 〈karen.chin@colorado.edu〉
A. A. Ekdale
Affiliation:
Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Utah, Room 347 FASB, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA, 〈a.ekdale@utah.edu〉
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Tiny sinuous trace fossils have been found within probable gut contents of an exceptionally preserved specimen of a hadrosaurid dinosaur, Brachylophosaurus canadensis, from the Judith River Formation of Montana. Approximately 280 examples of the trace fossils were observed in 19 samples of gut region material. The tubular structures typically are about 0.3 mm across. Many have thin calcareous linings or layers, and some exhibit fine surficial striae. At least two dozen of these trace fossils share walls with adjacent tubular traces, and this association can extend for several millimeters. While the trace fossils share some characteristics with fine rhizoliths, these features are most consistent with tiny burrows, or possibly body impressions, of worms (vermiform organisms) of uncertain biologic affinity. Such trace fossils have not been reported previously, and herein described as Parvitubulites striatus n. gen. n. sp. Either autochthonous (parasites) or allochthonous (scavengers) worms may have created the trace fossils, but taphonomic factors suggest that autochthonous burrowers are more likely. Several lines of evidence, such as constant diameters and matching directional changes, suggest that the paired trace fossils were made by two individuals moving at the same time, which implies sustained intraspecific contact. Parvitubulites striatus provides a rare record of interactions between terrestrial, meiofaunal-sized, soft-bodied invertebrates and a dinosaur carcass. The evidence that the worms may have parasitized a living hadrosaur and subsequently left traces of intraspecific behavior between individual worms adds unique information to our understanding of Mesozoic trophic interactions.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 90 , Issue 2 , March 2016 , pp. 279 - 287
Copyright
Copyright © 2016, The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bader, K., 2005, The use of forensic entomology in dinosaur taphonomy at a quarry in the Upper Jurassic Morrison Formation in northeastern Wyoming: Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, v. 25 (Supplement to Number 3), p. 33A.Google Scholar
Boyd, D.W., 1975, False or misleading traces, in Frey, R.W., ed., The Study of Trace Fossils: A Synthesis of Principles, Problems, and Procedures in Ichnology: New York, Springer-Verlag, p. 65–83.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, C.J.R., Taylor, J.D., and Glover, E.A., 2000, Marine carbonate cements, biofilms, biomineralization, and skeletogenesis: some bivalves do it all: Journal of Sedimentary Research, v. 70, p. 1129–1138.Google Scholar
Britt, B., Dangerfield, A., and Greenhalgh, B., 2005, Burrowed dinosaur bones: evidence of Cretaceous osteophagous beetles: Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, v. 25 (Supplement to Number 3), p. 39A.Google Scholar
Bromley, R.G., 1996, Trace Fossils (second edition): London, Chapman & Hall, 361 p.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, C.K., 1975, Recent lebensspuren in nonmarine aquatic environments, in Frey, R.W., ed., The Study of Trace Fossils: a Synthesis of Principles, Problems, and Procedures in Ichnology: New York, Springer-Verlag, p. 431–458.Google Scholar
Chin, K., and Bishop, J., 2007, Exploited twice: bored bone in a theropod coprolite from the Jurassic Morrison Formation of Utah, USA, in Bromley, R.G., Buatois, L.A., Mángano, M.G., Genise, J.F., and Melchor, R.N., eds., Sediment-Organism Interactions: A Multifaceted Ichnology: SEPM Special Publication No. 88, Tulsa, Society for Sedimentary Geology, p. 377–385.Google Scholar
Chin, K., and Gill, B.D., 1996, Dinosaurs, dung beetles, and conifers: participants in a Cretaceous food web: Palaios, v. 11, p. 280–285.Google Scholar
Chin, K., Hartman, J.H., and Roth, B., 2009, Opportunistic exploitation of dinosaur dung: fossil snails in coprolites from the Upper Cretaceous Two Medicine Formation of Montana: Lethaia, v. 42, p. 185–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croll, N.A., 1971, The Behaviour of Nematodes: Their Activities, Senses, and Responses, New York, St. Martin’s Press, 117 p.Google Scholar
Dash, M.C., 1983, Biology of Enchytraeidae (Oligochaeta): Dehradun, International Book Distributers, 171 p.Google Scholar
Durand, N., Monger, H.C., and Canti, M.G., 2010, Calcium carbonate features, in Stoops, G., Marcelino, V., and Mees, F., eds., Interpretation of Micromorphological Features of Soils and Regoliths: Amsterdam, Elsevier, p. 150–195.Google Scholar
Edwards, C. A., and Bohlen, P.J., 1996, Biology and Ecology of Earthworms, (third edition): London, Chapman & Hall, 426 p.Google Scholar
Ekdale, A.A., and de Gibert, J.M., 2010, Paleoethologic significance of bioglyphs: fingerprints of the subterraneans: Palaios, v. 25, p. 540–545.Google Scholar
Gao, T.-P., Shih, C.-K., Xu, X., Wang, S., and Ren, D., 2012, Mid-Mesozoic flea-like ectoparasites of feathered or haired vertebrates: Current Biology, v. 22, p. 732–735.Google Scholar
Genise, J.F., Bellosi, E.S., Verde, M., and González, M.G., 2011, Large ferruginized palaeorhizospheres from a Paleogene lateritic profile of Uruguay: Sedimentary Geology, v. 240, p. 85–96.Google Scholar
Goodey, J.B., 1963, Soil and Freshwater Nematodes (second edition): New York, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 544 p.Google Scholar
Hasiotis, S.T., Fiorillo, A.R., and Hanna, R.R., 1999, Preliminary report on borings in Jurassic dinosaur bones: evidence for invertebrate-vertebrate interactions, in Gillette, D.D., ed., Vertebrate Paleontology in Utah: Salt Lake City, Utah Geological Survey Miscellaneous Publication 99-1, Utah Geological Survey, p. 193–200.Google Scholar
Higgins, R.P., and Thiel, H., eds., 1988, Introduction to the Study of Meiofauna: Washington, D.C., Smithsonian Institution Press, 488 p.Google Scholar
Huang, D., Engel, M.S., Cai, C., Wu, H., and Nel, A., 2012, Diverse transitional giant fleas from the Mesozoic era of China: Nature, v. 483, p. 201–204.Google Scholar
Huettel, R.N., 2004, Reproductive behavior, in Gaugler, R., and Bilgrami, A.L., eds., Nematode Behaviour: Cambridge, CABI Publishing, p. 127–149.Google Scholar
Jaillard, B., Guyon, A., and Maurin, A.F., 1991, Structure and composition of calcified roots, and their identification in calcareous soils: Geoderma, v. 50, p. 197–210.Google Scholar
Klappa, C.F., 1980, Rhizoliths in terrestrial carbonates: classification, recognition, genesis and significance: Sedimentology, v. 27, p. 613–629.Google Scholar
Khormali, F., Abtahi, A., and Stoops, G., 2006, Micromorphology of calcitic features in highly calcareous soils of Fars Province, southern Iran: Geoderma, v. 132, p. 31–46.Google Scholar
Kirkland, J.I., Delgado, D.R., Chimedtseren, A., Hasiotis, S.T., and Fox, E.J., 1998, Insect? bored dinosaur skeletons and associated pupae from the Djadokhta Fm. (Cretaceous, Campanian): Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, v. 18 (Supplement to Number 3), p. 56A.Google Scholar
Kraus, M.J., and Hasiotis, S.T., 2006, Significance of different modes of rhizolith preservation to interpreting paleoenvironmental and paleohydrologic settings: examples from Paleogene paleosols, Bighorn Basin, Wyoming, U.S.A.: Journal of Sedimentary Research, v. 76, p. 633–646.Google Scholar
Moussa, M.T., 1970, Nematode fossil trails from the Green River Formation (Eocene) in the Uinta Basin, Utah: Journal of Paleontology, v. 44, p. 304–307.Google Scholar
Murphy, N.L., Trexler, D., and Thompson, M., 2007, “Leonardo,” a mummified Brachylophosaurus from the Judith River Formation, in Carpenter, K., ed., Horns and Beaks: Ceratopsian and Ornithopod Dinosaurs: Bloomington and Indianapolis, Indiana University Press, p. 117–133.Google Scholar
Nolte, M.J., Greenhalgh, B.W., Dangerfield, A., Scheetz, R.D., and Britt, B.B., 2004, Invertebrate burrows on dinosaur bones from the Lower Cretaceous Cedar Mountain Formation near Moab, Utah, U.S.A.: Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, v. 36, no. 5, p. 379.Google Scholar
O’Connor, F.B., 1967, The Enchytraeidae, in Burges, A., and Raw, F., eds., Soil Biology: London and New York, Academic Press, p. 213–257.Google Scholar
Paik, I.S., 2000, Bone chip-filled burrows associated with bored dinosaur bone in floodplain paleosols of the Cretaceous Hasandong Formation, Korea: Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, and Palaeoecology, v. 157, p. 213–225.Google Scholar
Payne, J.A., 1965, A summer carrion study of the baby pig Sus scrofa Linnaeus: Ecology, v. 46, p. 592–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poinar, G. Jr., and Boucot, A.J., 2006, Evidence of intestinal parasites of dinosaurs: Parasitology, v. 20, p. 245–249.Google Scholar
Poinar, G. Jr., and Poinar, R., 2008, What Bugged the Dinosaurs? Insects, Disease, and Death in the Cretaceous, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 264 p.Google Scholar
Retallack, G.J., 1983, Late Eocene and Oligocene Paleosols from Badlands National Park, South Dakota: Geological Society of America Special Paper 193, Boulder, Geological Society of America, 82 p.Google Scholar
Roberts, E.M., Rogers, R.R., and Foreman, B.Z., 2007, Continental insect borings in dinosaur bone: examples from the Late Cretaceous of Madagascar and Utah: Journal of Paleontology, v. 81, p. 201–208.Google Scholar
Robinson, A.F., 2004, Nematode behavior and migrations through soil and tissue, in Chen, Z.X., Chen, S.Y., and Dickson, D.W., eds., Nematology: Advances and Perspectives Vol. 1: Cambridge, Tsinghua University Press and CABI Publishing, p. 330–405.Google Scholar
Rogers, R.R., 1992, Non-marine borings in dinosaur bones from the Upper Cretaceous Two Medicine Formation, northwestern Montana: Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, v. 12, p. 528–531.Google Scholar
Sarjeant, W.A.S., 1975, Plant trace fossils, in Frey, R.W., ed., The Study of Trace Fossils: a Synthesis of Principles, Problems, and Procedures in Ichnology: New York, Springer-Verlag, p. 163–179.Google Scholar
Schieber, J., 2002, The role of an organic slime matrix in the formation of pyritized burrow trails and pyrite concretions: Palaios, v. 17, p. 104–109.Google Scholar
Seilacher, A., 1967, Fossil behavior: Scientific American, v. 217, p. 72–80.Google Scholar
Smith, K.G.V., 1986, A Manual of Forensic Entomology: Ithaca, Cornell University Press, 205 p.Google Scholar
Tweet, J.S., Chin, K., Murphy, N.L., and Braman, D.R., 2008, Probable gut contents within a specimen of Brachylophosaurus canadensis (Dinosauria: Hadrosauridae) from the Upper Cretaceous Judith River Formation of Montana: Palaios, v. 28, p. 624–635.Google Scholar
Verrecchia, E.P., and Verrecchia, K.E., 1994, Needle-fiber calcite: a critical review and a proposed classification: Journal of Sedimentary Research, v. A64, p. 650–664.Google Scholar