Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T14:47:26.525Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The provenance of export porcelain from the Nan'ao One shipwreck in the South China Sea

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 May 2016

Jian Zhu
Affiliation:
Department of Scientific History and Archaeometry, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 19A Yuquan Road, Shijingshan District, Beijing 100049, P.R. China Key Laboratory of Vertebrate Evolution and Human Origin, Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 142 Xizhimenwai Street, Beijing 100044, P.R. China
Hongjiao Ma
Affiliation:
Institute for Cultural Heritage and History of Science & Technology, University of Science and Technology Beijing, 30 Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100083, P.R. China
Naisheng Li
Affiliation:
Chinese Academy of Cultural Heritage, 2 Gaoyuan Street, Beisihuan donglu, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100029, P.R. China
Julian Henderson
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK
Michael D. Glascock*
Affiliation:
Research Reactor Center, University of Missouri, 1513 Research Park Drive, Columbia, MO 65211, USA (Email: glascockm@missouri.edu)
*
*Author for correspondence

Abstract

The discovery of the Nan'ao One shipwreck off the southern coast of China throws new light onto Chinese maritime trade during the late Ming period. The primary cargo was a massive consignment of blue-and-white export porcelain, most probably destined for markets in Southeast Asia or Europe. Compositional analysis was performed on 11 fragments of blue-and-white export porcelain from the wreck site and on 64 samples from 3 Chinese porcelain production centres. The results indicate that the blue-and-white export porcelain recovered from the Nan'ao One came from two sources: the Jingdezhen and Zhangzhou kilns. Given the location of the shipwreck, the most probable destinations were the Portuguese trading centre at Macau or the Dutch at Batavia.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd, 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bai, K. 1995. Studies on exported porcelain vessels of Jingdezhen from late Ming to Qianlong period in Qing dynasty. Fujian Wenbo 1: 2735.Google Scholar
Batchelor, R. 2013. The Selden map rediscovered: a Chinese map of East Asia shipping routes, c. 1619. Imago Mundi: The International Journal of the History of Cartography 65 (1): 3763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baxter, M.J. 1994. Exploratory multivariate analysis in archaeology. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Canepa, T. 2010. The Portuguese, Spanish and Dutch trade in Zhanghzou. Fujian Wenbo 4: 5866.Google Scholar
Cui, Y. 2011. The Ming dynasty shipwreck ‘Nan'ao One’ from Shantou City, Guangdong. Archaeology (7): 3946.Google Scholar
Dias, M.I., Prudêncio, M.I., Pinto De Matos, M.A. & Rodrigues, A. L.. 2013. Tracing the origin of blue-and-white Chinese porcelain ordered for the Portuguese market during the Ming dynasty using INAA. Journal of Archaeological Science 40: 3046–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2013.03.007 Google Scholar
Glascock, M.D. 1992. Characterization of archaeological ceramics at MURR by neutron activation analysis and multivariate statistics, in Neff, H. (ed.) Chemical characterization of ceramic paste in archaeology: 1126. Madison (WI): Prehistory.Google Scholar
Glascock, M.D., Neff, H. & Vaughn, K.J.. 2004. Instrumental neutron activation analysis and multivariate statistics for pottery provenance. Hyperfine Interactions 154 (1–4): 95105. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:HYPE.0000032025.37390.41 Google Scholar
Li, J. 2001. Zhangzhou harbour. Fuzhu: Fujian People's Press.Google Scholar
Ma, H., Zhu, J., Henderson, J. & Li, N.. 2012. Provenance of Zhangzhou export blue-and-white and its clay source. Journal of Archaeological Science 39: 1218–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2011.12.002 Google Scholar
Ming, C., Yang, Y., Zhu, J., Guan, L., Fan, C., Xu, C., Yao, Z., Kenoyer, J.M., Song, G. & Wang, C.S.. 2014. Archaeometric investigation of the relationship between ancient egg-white porcelain (Luanbai) and bluish-white glazed porcelain (Qingbai) from Hutian Kiln, Jingdezhen, China. Journal of Archaeological Science 47: 787–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2014.04.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollard, A.M. & Wood, N.. 1986. The development of Chinese porcelain technology at Jingdezhen, in Olin, J.S. & Blackman, M.J. (ed.) Proceedings of the 24th International Archaeometry Symposium: 104–14. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution.Google Scholar
Pradell, T., Vendrell-Saz, M., Krumbein, W. & Picon, M.. 1996. Alterations de ceramiques en milieu marin les amphores de l'epave Romaine de la Madrague de Giens. Revue d'Archaeometrie 20: 4756. http://dx.doi.org/10.3406/arsci.1996.936 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, R.J., Robinson, V.J. & Gibbins, D.J.L.. 1997. An investigation of the provenance of the Roman amphora cargo from the Plemmirio B shipwreck. Archaeometry 39: 921. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4754.1997.tb00787.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volker, T. 1954. Porcelain and the Dutch East India Company: as recorded in the Dagh-registers of Batavia Castle, those of Hirado and Deshima and other contemporary papers; 1602–1682. Leiden: Brill Archive.Google Scholar
Waksman, S.Y. 2011. Ceramics of the ‘Limani type’ and Fatimid pottery production in Beirut. Levant 43: 201–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/175638011X13112549593168 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Xie. 1981 [1617]. Investigations of the Eastern and Western Oceans. Beijing: Zhonghua Shuju.Google Scholar