Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T13:09:01.528Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Compulsory Voting and Dissatisfaction with Democracy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2016

Abstract

Compulsory voting is often linked to pro-democracy orientations in the public. However, there is reason to question the strength and universality of this link. Engaging research on the effects of coercion and punishment, this article argues that forced participation inflates the tendency of those with negative orientations towards democracy to see the democratic system as illegitimate, and to be dissatisfied with democracy. The study finds support for these expectations in analyses of three separate cross-national surveys and a natural experiment. Compulsory voting heightens dissatisfaction with democracy within key segments of the population.

Type
Articles
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Department of International Affairs, University of Georgia (email: singh@uga.edu). Previous versions of this article were presented at the 2014 Annual Conference of the Midwest Political Science Association and in the Department of Political Science at the University of Alabama in 2015. The author thanks participants at those presentations for helpful comments. The author also thanks Abby Córdova, Nicholas Kerr, Eric McGhee, Jennifer Oser, Alisa Rogers, Kerri Anne Watson and Bryce Williams-Tuggle for useful feedback. Finally, the author thanks the Latin American Public Opinion Project, Latinobarómetro Corporation and the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems the for making the data available. Due to space constraints, the introductory material, literature review, theoretical logic and concluding comments are presented here in an abbreviated form, and an expanded version of each is available in Section 15 of the Appendix. Data replication sets are available at http://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataverse/BJPolS and online appendices are available at http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1017/S0007123416000041.

References

Almond, Gabriel Abraham, and Verba, Sidney. 1963. The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Anderson, Christopher J., and Guillory, Christine A.. 1997. Political Institutions and Satisfaction with Democracy: A Cross-National Analysis of Consensus and Majoritarian Systems. American Political Science Review 91:6681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barthélemy, Joseph. 1912. L’Organisation Du Suffrage Et L’expérience Belge [The Organization of Suffrage and the Belgian Experience]. Paris: M. Giard & É. Brière.Google Scholar
Birch, Sarah. 2009. Full Participation: A Comparative Study of Compulsory Voting. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Blais, André. 2006. What Affects Voter Turnout? Annual Review of Political Science 9:111125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blais, André, Massicotte, Louis, and Dobrzynska, Agnieszka. 2003. Why Is Turnout Higher in Some Countries Than in Others? Ottawa: Elections Canada.Google Scholar
Bratton, Michael, Mattes, Robert B., and Gyimah-Boadi, Emmanuel. 2005. Public Opinion, Democracy, and Market Reform in Africa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Broomall, John M. 1893. Compulsory Voting. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 3:9397.Google Scholar
Canache, Damarys, Mondak, Jeffery J., and Seligson, Mitchell A.. 2001. Meaning and Measurement in Cross-National Research on Satisfaction with Democracy. Public Opinion Quarterly 65:506528.Google Scholar
Carey, John M., and Horiuchi, Yusaku. 2014. Compulsory Voting and Income Inequality. Presented at the Citizens, Parties, and Electoral Contexts Workshop of the Electoral Integrity Project and Making Electoral Democracy Work Project, Montreal, 18 July.Google Scholar
Carlin, Ryan E., and Singer, Matthew M.. 2011. Support for Polyarchy in the Americas. Comparative Political Studies 44:15001526.Google Scholar
Carreras, Miguel, and Castañeda-Angarita, Néstor. 2014. Who Votes in Latin America? A Test of Three Theoretical Perspectives. Comparative Political Studies 47:10791104.Google Scholar
Chong, Alberto, and Olivera, Mauricio. 2008. Does Compulsory Voting Help Equalize Incomes? Economics & Politics 20:391415.Google Scholar
Clarke, Harold D., and Kornberg, Allan. 1992. Support for the Canadian Federal Progressive Conservative Party Since 1988: The Impact of Economic Evaluations and Economic Issues. Canadian Journal of Political Science 25:2953.Google Scholar
Córdova, Abby, and Seligson, Mitchell A.. 2009. Economic Crisis and Democracy in Latin America. PS: Political Science & Politics 42:673678.Google Scholar
deCharms, Richard. 1968. Personal Causation: The Internal Affective Determinants of Behavior. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Deci, Edward L. 1975. Intrinsic Motivation. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Deci, Edward L., and Ryan, Richard M.. 2000. The ‘What’ and ‘Why’ of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior. Psychological Inquiry 11:227268.Google Scholar
Finkel, Steven E. 1985. Reciprocal Effects of Participation and Political Efficacy: A Panel Analysis. American Journal of Political Science 29:891913.Google Scholar
Finkel, Steven E. 1987. The Effects of Participation on Political Efficacy and Political Support: Evidence from a West German Panel. Journal of Politics 49:441464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fornos, Carolina A., Power, Timothy J., and Garand, James C.. 2004. Explaining Voter Turnout in Latin America, 1980 to 2000. Comparative Political Studies 37:909940.Google Scholar
Franklin, Mark N. 1999. Electoral Engineering and Cross-National Turnout Differences: What Role for Compulsory Voting? British Journal of Political Science 29:205216.Google Scholar
Fuchs, Dieter. 1993. Trends of Political Support in the Federal Republic of Germany. In Political Culture in Germany, edited by Dirk Berg-Schlosser and Ralf Rytlewski, 232268. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Fuchs, Dieter, Guidorossi, Giovanna, and Svensson, Palle. 1995. Support for the Democratic System. In Citizens and the State, edited by Hans D. Klingemann and Dieter Fuchs, 323353. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Geys, Benny. 2006. Explaining Voter Turnout: A Review of Aggregate-Level Research. Electoral Studies 25:637663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirczy, Wolfgang. 1994. The Impact of Mandatory Voting Laws on Turnout: A Quasi-Experimental Approach. Electoral Studies 13:6476.Google Scholar
Ikeda, Ken’ichi, Kobayashi, Tetsuro, and Hoshimoto, Maasa. 2008. Does Political Participation Make a Difference? The Relationship Between Political Choice, Civic Engagement and Political Efficacy. Electoral Studies 27:7788.Google Scholar
Imbens, Guido W., and Lemieux, Thomas. 2008. Regression Discontinuity Designs: A Guide to Practice. Journal of Econometrics 142:615635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klingemann, Hans-Dieter. 1999. Mapping Political Support in the 1990s: A Global Analysis. In Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government, edited by Pippa Norris, 3156. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kornberg, Allan, and Clarke, Harold D.. 1992. Citizens and Community: Political Support in a Representative Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kornberg, Allan, and Clarke, Harold D.. 1994. Beliefs About Democracy and Satisfaction with Democratic Government: The Canadian Case. Political Research Quarterly 47:537563.Google Scholar
Lee, David S. 2008. Randomized Experiments from Non-Random Selection in US House Elections. Journal of Econometrics 142:675697.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1997. Unequal Participation: Democracy’s Unresolved Dilemma. American Political Science Review 91:114.Google Scholar
Mackerras, Malcolm, and McAllister, Ian. 1999. Compulsory Voting, Party Stability and Electoral Advantage in Australia. Electoral Studies 18:217233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malkopoulou, Anthoula. 2015. The History of Compulsory Voting in Europe: Democracy’s Duty? New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Massicotte, Louis, Blais, André, and Yoshinaka, Antoine. 2004. Establishing the Rules of the Game: Election Laws in Democracies. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Nerincx, Alfred. 1901. Compulsory Voting in Belgium. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 18:8790.Google Scholar
Norris, Pippa. 2004. Electoral Engineering: Voting Rules and Political Behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Panagopoulos, Costas. 2008. The Calculus of Voting in Compulsory Voting Systems. Political Behavior 30:455467.Google Scholar
Payne, J. Mark, Zovatto, Daniel, and Díaz, Mercedes Mateo. 2006. La Política Importa: Democracia Y Desarrollo En América Latina. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank and International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance.Google Scholar
Powell, G. Bingham. 1982. Contemporary Democracies: Participation, Stability, and Violence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Power, Timothy J. 2009. Compulsory for Whom? Mandatory Voting and Electoral Participation in Brazil, 1986–2006. Journal of Politics in Latin America 1:97122.Google Scholar
Quintelier, Ellen. 2013. Socialization or Self-Selection? Membership in Deliberative Associations and Political Attitudes. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 42:174192.Google Scholar
Quintelier, Ellen, and van Deth, Jan W.. 2014. Supporting Democracy: Political Participation and Political Attitudes. Exploring Causality Using Panel Data. Political Studies 62:153171.Google Scholar
Robson, William A. 1923. Compulsory Voting. Political Science Quarterly 38:569577.Google Scholar
Sarsfield, Rodolfo, and Echegaray, Fabián. 2006. Opening the Black Box: How Satisfaction with Democracy and Its Perceived Efficacy Affect Regime Preference in Latin America. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 18:153173.Google Scholar
Schedler, Andreas, and Sarsfield, Rodolfo. 2007. Democrats with Adjectives: Linking Direct and Indirect Measures of Democratic Support. European Journal of Political Research 46:637659.Google Scholar
Scheff, Thomas J., and Retzinger, Suzanne M.. 1991. Emotions and Violence: Shame and Rage in Destructive Conflicts. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Schlozman, Kay Lehman, Verba, Sidney, and Brady, Henry E.. 1995. Participation’s Not a Paradox: The View from American Activists. British Journal of Political Science 25:136.Google Scholar
Seligson, Mitchell A. 2007. The Rise of Populism and the Left in Latin America. Journal of Democracy 18:8195.Google Scholar
Sherman, Lawrence W. 1993. Defiance, Deterrence, and Irrelevance: A Theory of the Criminal Sanction. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 30:445473.Google Scholar
Sherman, Lawrence W. 2003. Defiance Theory. In Criminological Theory: Past to Present: Essential Readings , edited by Francis T. Cullen and Robert Agnew, 325332. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sidman, Murray. 1989. Coercion and Its Fallout. Boston, MA: Authors Cooperative.Google Scholar
Singh, Shane P. 2011. How Compelling Is Compulsory Voting? A Multilevel Analysis of Turnout. Political Behavior 33:95111.Google Scholar
Singh, Shane P. 2015. Compulsory Voting and the Turnout Decision Calculus. Political Studies 63:548568.Google Scholar
Stengers, Jean. 2004. Histoire De La Législation Électorale En Belgique [History of Electoral Legislation in Belgium]. Revue belge de philologie et d’histoire 82:247270.Google Scholar
Thomassen, Jacques. 1995. Support for Democratic Values. In Citizens and the State, edited by Hans D. Klingemann and Dieter Fuchs, 383416. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
Tingsten, Herbert. 1937. Political Behavior: Studies in Election Statistics. London: King & Son.Google Scholar
Tyler, Tom R. 2006. Why People Obey the Law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wattenberg, Martin P. 2002. Where Have All the Voters Gone? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: Link
Link
Supplementary material: PDF

Singh supplementary material

Online Appendix

Download Singh supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 1 MB