Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-03T11:59:20.237Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Victim Participation in Japan: When Therapeutic Jurisprudence Meets Prosecutor Justice∙

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2016

Erik HERBER
Erik HERBER*
Affiliation:
Leiden Institute for Area Studies (LIAS), School of Asian Studies (SAS), Faculty of Law, Van Vollenhoven Institute for Metajuridica, Law and Governance, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article examines how a therapeutic perspective on victim participation has been conceptualized and implemented in criminal trials in Japan after procedural reforms in 2000 and 2008. Findings are discussed with reference to therapeutic jurisprudence studies on victim participation and relevant literature on Japanese criminal justice. Analysis of policy documents, survey data, interviews, and minutes of Ministry of Justice “expert meetings” reveals how the therapeutic needs of victims and the therapeutic effects of victim participation in court proceedings have been understood and conceptualized based on generalized common-sense assumptions of legal practitioners. In court, participants’ reference to victims’ wellbeing and recovery puts pressure on judges to impose harsher punishment than usual, while reinforcing the position of prosecutors. The adopted therapeutic perspective, combined with traditionally expected displays of remorse, furthermore has the effect of limiting the defence’s ability to argue facts and circumstances favourable to the defendant.

Keywords

Japanvictim participationtherapeutic jurisprudencecriminal justicelegal reform
Type
Research Article
Information
Asian Journal of Law and Society , Volume 3 , Issue 1 , May 2016 , pp. 135 - 157
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press and KoGuan Law School, Shanghai Jiao Tong University 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

∙

The author would like to thank the anonymous reviewers and Jennifer Connelly for their valuable critique and comments, and the Japan Federation of Bar Associations for kindly making available unpublished survey data.

*

University lecturer. Correspondence to Erik Herber, Leiden Institute for Area Studies (LIAS), School of Asian Studies (SAS), Faculty of Law, Van Vollenhoven Institute for Metajuridica, Law and Governance, Leiden University, P.O.Box 9515 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands. E-mail address: e.d.herber@hum.leidenuniv.nl.

References

Abe, Chizuko (2010) “Higaishasankaseido ni Kansuru Ikkōsatsu: Higaishasanka no konkyo/Higaishasanka no Mokuteki/Higaisha no Hōteki Chii” [“A Study of the Victim Participation System: The Basis of Victim Participation/The Goal of Victim Participation/Victims’ Legal Position”]. 62 Dōshisha Hōgaku [Dōshisha Law Review] 963–1084.Google Scholar
aiben.jp (2009) “Higaishasankaseido no Jisshijōkyō” [“Situation Concerning the Actual Implementation of the Victim Participation System”], online <http://www.aiben.jp/page/library/kaihou/2110_01.html – Aichi Bar Association website> (last accessed 20 September 2015).+(last+accessed+20+September+2015).>Google Scholar
Alexander, Ellen K., & Lord, Janice Harris (1994) Impact Statements: A Victim’s Right to Speak … a Nation’s Responsibility to Listen, Arlington, VA: National Victim Center.Google Scholar
Aoki, Takayuki (2013) Keijishihōkaikaku to Saiban’in Seido [Criminal Justice Reforms and the Lay Participation System], Tokyo: Nihon Hyōronsha.Google Scholar
Arrigo, Bruce A. (2004) “The Ethics of Therapeutic Jurisprudence: A Critical and Theoretical Enquiry of Law, Psychology and Crime.” 11 Psychiatry, Psychology and Law 23–43.Google Scholar
Bandes, Susan A. (2009) “Victims, ‘Closure,’ and the Sociology of Emotion.” 72 Law and Contemporary Problems 1–26.Google Scholar
cao.go.jp (2003) “Hanzaihigaisha Kihonhō” [“Basic Act on Crime Victims”], Cabinet Office website, online <http://www8.cao.go.jp/hanzai/kihon/hou.html> (last accessed 20 September 2015).+(last+accessed+20+September+2015).>Google Scholar
cao.go.jp (2004) “Hanzaihigaisha Nado Kihonkeikaku” [“Crime Victims Basic Plan”], Cabinet Office website, online <http://www8.cao.go.jp/hanzai/kuwashiku/keikaku/keikaku.html> (last accessed 20 September 2015).+(last+accessed+20+September+2015).>Google Scholar
Chalmers, James, Duff, Peter& Leverick, Fiona (2007) “Victim Impact Statements: Can Work, Do Work (for Those Who Bother to Make Them).” Criminal Law Review 360–379.Google Scholar
Corey, Zachary, & Hans, Valerie P. (2010) “Japan’s New Lay Judge System: Deliberative Democracy in Action.” 12 Asian-Pacific Law & Policy Journal 72–94.Google Scholar
courts.go.jp (1990) “Supreme Court Third Petty Bench Ruling,” Supreme Court of Japan website, online <http://www.courts.go.jp/app/files/hanrei_jp/645/062645_hanrei.pdf> (last accessed 20 September 2015).+(last+accessed+20+September+2015).>Google Scholar
courts.go.jp (2002) “Kobe District Court Judgment Heisei 13 (wa) 636, Heisei 15–10–24,” Supreme Court of Japan website, online <http://www.courts.go.jp/app/files/hanrei_jp/917/006917_hanrei.pdf> (last accessed 20 September 2015).+(last+accessed+20+September+2015).>Google Scholar
courts.go.jp (2006) “Saitama District Court Judgment Heisei 18 (wa) 1701, Heisei 19–3–16,” Supreme Court of Japan website, online <http://www.courts.go.jp/app/files/hanrei_jp/290/035290_hanrei.pdf> (last accessed 20 September 2015).+(last+accessed+20+September+2015).>Google Scholar
courts.go.jp (2008) “Kōhanmae Seiritetsuduki ni tsuite” [“On Pre-Trial Conference Procedures”], Supreme Court of Japan website, online <http://www.courts.go.jp/vcms_lf/20903007.pdf> (last accessed 20 September 2015).+(last+accessed+20+September+2015).>Google Scholar
courts.go.jp (2009) “Saiban’in Seido no Shōkai” [“Introduction of the Lay Assessor System”], Supreme Court of Japan website, online <http://www.saibanin.courts.go.jp/introduction/index.html> (last accessed 20 September 2015).+(last+accessed+20+September+2015).>Google Scholar
courts.go.jp (2015) “Supreme Court of Japan Verdicts Search Engine,” Supreme Court of Japan website, online <http://www.courts.go.jp/app/hanrei_jp/search1> (last accessed 20 September 2015).+(last+accessed+20+September+2015).>Google Scholar
David, Roman, & Choi, Susanne Y.P. (2009) “Getting Even or Getting Equal? Retributive Desires and Transitional Justice.” Political Psychology 161–192.Google Scholar
Davis, Robert C., & Smith, Barbara E. (1994) “Victim Impact Statements and Victim Satisfaction: An Unfulfilled Promise?” 22 Journal of Criminal Justice 1–12.Google Scholar
Diesen, Christian (2013) “Therapeutic Jurisprudence and the Victim of Crime,” in K.T. Oei & M.S. Groenhuijsen, eds., Progression in Forensic Psychiatry: About Boundaries, Deventer: Kluwer, 579–598.Google Scholar
Erez, Edna, & Rogers, Linda (1999) “Victim Impact Statements and Sentencing Outcomes and Processes: The Perspectives of Legal Professionals.” 39 British Journal of Criminology 216–239.Google Scholar
Erez, Edna, & Tontodonato, Pamela (1990) “Effect of Victim Participation in Sentencing on Sentence Outcome.” 28 Criminology 451–474.Google Scholar
Foote, Daniel H. (2011) Law in Japan: A Turning Point, Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Gordon, Trina M., & Brodsky, Stanley L. (2007) “The Influence of Victim Impact Statements on Sentencing in Capital Cases.” 7 Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice 45–52.Google Scholar
Goto, Akira (2014) “Citizen Participation in Criminal Trials in Japan.” 42 International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice 117–129.Google Scholar
Hamai, Koichi (2004) “Nihon no Chianakka Shinwa ha ika ni tsukuraretaka” [“How the Myth of the Collapsing Safe Society Has Been Created in Japan”]. 29 Hanzaishakaigakukenkyū [Japanese Journal of Sociological Criminology] 10–26.Google Scholar
Hamai, Koichi, & Ellis, Tom (2006) “Crime and Criminal Justice in Modern Japan: From Re-Integrative Shaming to Popular Punitivism.” 34 International Journal of the Sociology of Law 157–178.Google Scholar
Hamai, Koichi, & Ellis, Tom (2008) “Japanese Criminal Justice Was Reintegrative Shaming a Chimera?” 10 Punishment & Society 25–46.Google Scholar
Harada, Kunio (2004) Ryokeihandan no Jissai [The Practice of Sentencing in Japan—Zohoban], Tokyo: Tachibana Shobo.Google Scholar
Herber, Erik (2003) “The (Japanese) Administration of Justice and the Will to Truth.” 31 International Journal of the Sociology of Law 107–114.Google Scholar
Hirayama, Mari (2012) “Lay Judge Decisions in Sex Crime Cases: The Most Controversial Area of Saiban-in Trials.” 3 Yonsei Law Journal 128–145.Google Scholar
Hōmuinkaichōsashitsu (2007) “Hanzaihigaisha nado no Keijisanka” [“Participation in Criminal Trials by Victims and so on”], Lower House of Japan website, online <http://www.sangiin.go.jp/japanese/annai/chousa/rippou_chousa/backnumber/2007pdf/20070420017.pdf> (last accessed 20 September 2015).+(last+accessed+20+September+2015).>Google Scholar
Japan Federation of Legal Bar Associations (JFBA) (2007) “Hanzai Higaisha nado ga Keijisaiban ni chokusetsu Kanyo suru Koto no dekiru Higaisha Sanka Seido ni Hantai suru Ikensho” [“Statement of Opinion against a Victim Participation System that Makes It Possible for Victims of Crime and so on to Be Directly Involved in Criminal Trials”], JFBA website, online <http://www.nichibenren.or.jp/library/ja/opinion/report/data/070501.pdf> (last accessed 20 September 2015).+(last+accessed+20+September+2015).>Google Scholar
Japan Federation of Legal Bar Associations (2012a) “Genkō no Higaishasankaseido no Minaoshi ni Kansuru Ikensho” [“Statement of Opinion Concerning the Revision of the Current System of Victim Participation”], Ministry of Justice website, online <http://www.moj.go.jp/content/000109468.pdf> (last accessed 20 September 2015).+(last+accessed+20+September+2015).>Google Scholar
Japan Federation of Legal Bar Associations (2012b) “Untitled Unpublished Survey on Victim Participation, Material Handed out at Ministry of Justice Heisei 19nen Kaisei Keijisoshōhōnado ni Kansuru Ikenkōkankai [Meetings to Exchange Views on the 2006 Revised Code of Criminal Procedure, etc.], Meeting Minutes,” MOJ website, online <http://www.moj.go.jp/keiji1/keiji12_00068.html> (last accessed 20 September 2015).+(last+accessed+20+September+2015).>Google Scholar
Johnson, David T. (2001) The Japanese Way of Justice: Prosecuting Crime in Japan, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, David T. (2012) “Japan’s Prosecution System.” 41 Crime and Justice 35–74.Google Scholar
Kantei.go.jp (2003) Headquarter for the Promotion of the Reform of the System of Justice Administration website, part of Prime Minister of Japan and His Cabinet website, online <http://www.kantei.go.jp/jp/singi/sihou/index.html> (last accessed 20 September 2015).+(last+accessed+20+September+2015).>Google Scholar
Kawaai, Masayuki (2011) “Hikokunin no Hanseitaido nado to Ryokei” [“Defendants’ Remorseful Attitude etc. and Sentencing],” in K. Osaka, ed., Ryōkei Jitsumu Taikei (Vol. 3) [A Treatise on Sentencing Law and Practice in Japanese Criminal Cases], Tokyo: Hanrei Taimuzusha, 172–215.Google Scholar
Kawai, Mikio (2004) Anzen Shinwa Hōkai no Paradokkusu [The Paradox of the Collapse of the Safety Myth], Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.Google Scholar
Kuzuno, Hiroyuki (2013) “Saibanin Seido to Keijishihō Kaikaku” [“Criminal Justice Reforms and the System of Lay Participation”]. 79 Hōshakaigaku [The Japanese Association of Sociology of Law Journal] 37–62.Google Scholar
law.e-gov.go.jp (1948) “Keijisoshōhō” [“Code of Criminal Procedure”], Government of Japan Legal Database website, online <http://law.e-gov.go.jp/htmldata/S23/S23HO131.html> (last accessed 20 September 2015).+(last+accessed+20+September+2015).>Google Scholar
law.e-gov.go.jp (2007) “Aum Shinrikyō Hanzaihigaisha wo Kyūsai suru tame no Kyūfukin no shikyū ni kansuru Hōritsu” [“Law Concerning the Payment of Benefits in Support of Victims etc. of Crimes of Aum Shinrikyō”], Government of Japan Legal Database website, online <http://law.e-gov.go.jp/htmldata/H20/H20HO080.html> (last accessed 20 September 2015).+(last+accessed+20+September+2015).>Google Scholar
Lens, Kim M., Pemberton, Anthony, & Bogaerts, Stefan (2013) “Heterogeneity in Victim Participation: A New Perspective on Delivering a Victim Impact Statement.” 10 European Journal of Criminology 479–495.Google Scholar
Lens, Kim M., Pemberton, AnthonyBrans, KarenBraeken, JohanBogaerts, Stefan& Lahlah, Esmah (2015) “Delivering a Victim Impact Statement: Emotionally Effective or Counter-Productive?” 12 European Journal of Criminology 17–34.Google Scholar
Maruna, Shadd, & King, Anna (2004) “Public Opinion and Community Penalties,” in A. Bottoms, S. Rex, et al, eds., Alternatives to Prison: Options for an Insecure Society, Portland: Willan Publishing, 83–112.Google Scholar
Matsuo, Koya (2010) “Hanzaihigaisha to Hō” [“Crime Victims and the Law”]. 64 Nihongakushi’inkiyō 71–87.Google Scholar
Matsui, Shigeru (2011) “Justice for the Accused or Justice for Victims: The Protection of Victims’ Rights in Japan.” 13 Asian-Pacific Law & Policy Journal 54–95.Google Scholar
Miyazawa, Setsuo (2008) “The Politics of Increasing Punitiveness and the Rising Populism in Japanese Criminal Justice Policy.” 10 Punishment & Society 47–77.Google Scholar
Miyazawa, Setsuo (2014) “Citizen Participation in Criminal Trials in Japan: The Saiban-in System and Victim Participation in Japan in International Perspectives.” 42 International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice 71–82.Google Scholar
moj.go.jp (2006–07) “Hōseishingikai Keijihō (Hanzaihigaishakankei) Bukai” [“Deliberative Council Criminal Law (Crime Victims Affairs) Section”], Ministry of Justice website, online <http://www.moj.go.jp/shingi1/shingi_keiji_higaisha_index.html> (last accessed 20 September 2015).+(last+accessed+20+September+2015).>Google Scholar
moj.go.jp (2009) “Higaishasankashinshutsu no atta Jiken no Higaisha nado no Jinin” [“Victims in Cases in which an Application for Victim Participation Was Made”], Ministry of Justice website, online <http://www.moj.go.jp/content/000106702.pdf> (last accessed 20 September 2015).+(last+accessed+20+September+2015).>Google Scholar
moj.go.jp (2011) “Hanzaihigaishakanrenshoseido no Jisshijōkyō” [“The Situation Concerning the Implementation of the Various Systems Related to Crime Victims”], Ministry of Justice website, online <http://www.moj.go.jp/content/000100784.pdf> (last accessed 20 September 2015).+(last+accessed+20+September+2015).>Google Scholar
moj.go.jp (2012a) “Hanzaihigaisha no Katagata ni Taisuru Anke-to Chōsa” [“Survey-Based Research of Victims of Crime”], Ministry of Justice website, online <http://www.moj.go.jp/content/000110030.pdf> (last accessed 20 September 2015).+(last+accessed+20+September+2015).>Google Scholar
moj.go.jp (2012b) “Hanzaihigaishadantai kara no Hiaringu (Daiikkai) no Kaisai ni Tsuite” [“Concerning the Holding of a Hearing (No. 1) Involving Crime Victims’ Groups”], Ministry of Justice website, online <http://www.moj.go.jp/keiji1/keiji12_00065.html> (last accessed 20 September 2015).+(last+accessed+20+September+2015).>Google Scholar
moj.go.jp (2012c) “Higaishasankashinshutsu no atta Jiken no Higaisha nado no Jinin” [“Victims in Cases in which an Application for Victim Participation Was Made”], Ministry of Justice website, online <http://www.moj.go.jp/content/000115194.pdf> (last accessed 20 September 2015).+(last+accessed+20+September+2015).>Google Scholar
moj.go.jp (2013–14) “Heisei 19nen Kaisei Keijisoshōhō nado ni Kansuru Ikenkōkan ni Tsuite” [“Concerning the Meetings to Exchange Views on the 2006 Revised Code of Criminal Procedure, etc.”], Ministry of Justice website, online <moj.go.jp/keiji1/keiji12_00068.html> (last accessed 20 September 2015).+(last+accessed+20+September+2015).>Google Scholar
moj.go.jp (2014) “White Papers on Crime,” Ministry of Justice website, online <http://hakusyo1.moj.go.jp/jp/61/nfm/mokuji.html> (last accessed 20 September 2015).+(last+accessed+20+September+2015).>Google Scholar
moj.go.jp (2015) “Hanzaihigaisha no Katagata he” [“To Victims of Crime”], Ministry of Justice website, online <http://www.moj.go.jp/content/000121888.pdf> (last accessed 20 September 2015).+(last+accessed+20+September+2015).>Google Scholar
Nadler, Janice, & Rose, Mary R. (2002) “Victim Impact Testimony and the Psychology of Punishment.” 88 Cornell Law Review 419–456.Google Scholar
Nakajima, Hiroshi (2012) “Keijisoshō ni okeru Higaishasankaseido no Jisshōteki Kenkyū: Kaiseihō no ‘3nengo no Minaoshi’ ni Mukete” [“Evidence-Based Research on the System of Victim Participation within Criminal Proceedings: Towards the ‘Revision after Three Years’”], Kagoshima University website, online <http://ir.kagoshima-u.ac.jp/bitstream/10232/14705/1/21530067seika.pdf> (last accessed 20 September 2015).+(last+accessed+20+September+2015).>Google Scholar
National Association of Crime Victims and Surviving Families (NAVS) (2012) “Higaishasankaseido no 3nengo Minaoshi ni Kansuru Ikensho” [“Statement of Opinion Concerning the Revision of the Victim Participation System After Three Years”], Ministry of Justice website, online <http://www.moj.go.jp/content/000102446.pdf> (last accessed 20 September 2015).+(last+accessed+20+September+2015).>Google Scholar
navs.jp (2002) “Ikensho” [“Statement of Opinion”], National Association of Crime Victims and Surviving Families website, online <http://www.navs.jp/report/1/opinion2/opinion2-3.html> (last accessed 20 September 2015).+(last+accessed+20+September+2015).>Google Scholar
npa.go.jp (1996) “Higaisha Taisaku Yōkō” [“Outline of Measures for Crime Victims”], National Police Agency website, online <npa.go.jp/higaisya/data/yoko.htm> (last accessed 20 September 2015).+(last+accessed+20+September+2015).>Google Scholar
Ogawa, Taro (1974) “Hanzai ni yoru Higaisha no Kyūsaiseido—Eibei Hōkei wo Chūshin ni” [“Systems to Provide Aid for Victims of Crime—Focusing on the UK and US Legal Systems”]. 575 Jurisuto [Jurist] 42–49.Google Scholar
Osaka, Keijijitsumukenkyūkai, ed. (2011) Ryōkei Jitsumu Taikei (Vol. 1.) [A Treatise on Sentencing Law and Practice in Japanese Criminal Cases], Tokyo: Hanrei Taimuzusha.Google Scholar
Ota, Tatsuya (2007) “A New Horizon of Victim Support in Japan,” in W.-C. Chan, ed., Support for Victims of Crime in Asia, Oxon: Routledge, 240–261.Google Scholar
Otani, Michitaka (2008) “Shakaitekina Kyūsai Taisho to shite no ‘Hanzai Higaisha’” [“‘Crime Victims’ as the Objects of Social Aid”]. 4 Core Ethics 25–36.Google Scholar
Partnership for Safety and Justice (2011) “Victim Advocates Call on Public Safety Commission to Consider Diversity of Victims’ Needs,” online <http://www.safetyandjustice.org/spotlight/victim-advocates-call-public-safety-commission-consider-diversity-victims%E2%80%99-needs> (last accessed 20 September 2015).+(last+accessed+20+September+2015).>Google Scholar
Pemberton, Anthony, & Reynaers, Sandra (2011) “The Controversial Nature of Victim Participation: Therapeutic Benefits in Victim Impact Statements,” Social Science Research Network website, online <http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1745923> (last accessed 20 September 2015).+(last+accessed+20+September+2015).>Google Scholar
Peters, Antonie (1992) “Some Comparative Observations on the Criminal Justice Process in Holland and Japan.” 4 Journal of the Japan-Netherlands Institute 247–294.Google Scholar
Roberts, Julian V. (2009) “Listening to the Crime Victim: Evaluating Victim Input at Sentencing and Parole.” 38 Crime and Justice 347–412.Google Scholar
Roderick, Dennis, & Krumholz, Susan T. (2006) “Much Ado about Nothing: A Critical Examination of Therapeutic Jurisprudence.” 1 Southern New England Roundtable Symposium Law Journal 201–223.Google Scholar
Saeki, Masahiko (2010) “Victim Participation in Criminal Trials in Japan.” 38 International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice 149–165.Google Scholar
Sanders, Andrew, Rod Morgan, Carolyn Hoyle, & Cape, Ed (2001) “Victim Impact Statements: Don’t Work, Can’t Work.” Criminal Law Review 447–458.Google Scholar
Shiraiwa, Yuko, & Karasawa, Kaori (2013) “Higaishasankanin no Hatsugen oyobi Higaishasankaseido he no Taido ga Ryōkei ni ataeru Eikyō” [“The Influence of Attitudes towards the Victim Participation System and Participating Victims’ Statements on Sentencing”]. 53 Jikenshakai Shinrigakukenkyū [Japanese Journal of Social Psychology] 12–21.Google Scholar
Shiraiwa, Yuko, & Karasawa, Kaori (2014) “Hanzaihigaisha no Saibankanyo ga Shihō he no Shinrai ni ataeru Kōka” [“The Effect of Participation of Victims in Trials on Their Confidence in the Criminal Justice System”]. 85 Shinrigaku Kenkyū [Japanese Journal of Social Psychology] 20–28.Google Scholar
Suwa, Masaaki (2010) “Keijisaiban ni okeru Higaishasankaseido no Mondaiten” [“Problems of the System of Victim Participation within Criminal Trials”]. 15 Shinshūdaigaku Hogaku Ronshū [Shinshū University Collection of Jurisprudence Papers] 55–90.Google Scholar
Takano, Mao (2009) “Aum Shinrikyō Hanzaihigaisha nado wo Kyūsai suru tame no Kyūfukin no Shikyū ni kansuru Hōritsu: Terorizumu to tatakau Wagakuni no Shisei wo akiraka ni” [“Laws Concerning the Payment of Support Funds in Aid of Victims and so on of Aum Shinrikyō: Clarifying Japan’s Stance in Fighting Terrorism”]. 64 Keisatsu Kōron [Police Review] 42–45.Google Scholar
Van Stokkom, Bas (2011) “Victims’ Needs, Well-Being and ‘Closure’: Is Revenge Therapeutic?,” in E. Erez and M. Kilchling, et al, eds., Therapeutic Jurisprudence and Victim Participation in Justice: International Perspectives, Durham: Carolina Academic Press, 207–228.Google Scholar
VS, Fooramu, ed. (2013) Keesusutadi Higaishasankaseido [Case Studies of the Victim Participation System], Tokyo: Hōreishuppan.Google Scholar
Wagatsuma, Hiroshi, & Rosett, Arthur (1986) “The Implications of Apology: Law and Culture in Japan and the United States.” 20 Law and Society Review 461–498.Google Scholar
Weber, Ingram (2009) “The New Japanese Jury System: Empowering the Public, Preservation Continental Justice.” 4 East Asia Law Review 125–176.Google Scholar
Wemmers, Jo-Anne M. (2008) “Victim Participation and Therapeutic Jurisprudence.” 3 Victims and Offenders 165–191.Google Scholar
Wexler, David (2000) “Therapeutic Jurisprudence: An Overview.” 17 Thomas M. Cooley Law Review 125–134.Google Scholar
Wexler, David B. (1999) “The Development of Therapeutic Jurisprudence: From Theory to Practice,” La Rama Judicial de Puerto Rico website, online <http://tribunal.gov.pr/Miscel/Conferencia/PDF/Conf_I_II.pdf#page=17> (last accessed 20 September 2015).+(last+accessed+20+September+2015).>Google Scholar
Wexler, David B., & Winick, Bruce J., eds. (1996) Law in a Therapeutic Key: Developments in Therapeutic Jurisprudence, Durham: Carolina Academic Press.Google Scholar
Wexler, David B., & Winick, Bruce J., eds. (2003) Judging in a Therapeutic Key: Therapeutic Jurisprudence and the Courts, Durham: Carolina Academic Press.Google Scholar
Zech, Emmanuelle, & Rimé, Bernard (2005) “Is Talking about an Emotional Experience Helpful? Effects on Emotional Recovery and Perceived Benefits.” 12 Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy 270–287.Google Scholar