Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T16:32:01.978Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWS AND CASE STUDIES: Public Perception, Knowledge, and Participation in Climate Change Adaptation Governance in the Coastal Region of Bangladesh Using the Social Ecological Inventory (SEI) Tool

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 February 2016

Khalid Md. Bahauddin ,
Nasibul Rahman  and
MD Tanvir Hasnine
Khalid Md. Bahauddin
Affiliation:
International Society for Development and Sustainability, Japan
Nasibul Rahman*
Affiliation:
University of Dhaka, Dhaka, Bangladesh
MD Tanvir Hasnine
Affiliation:
Yildiz Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey
*
*Address correspondence to: Nasibul Rahman; (e-mail) rahman.nasibul@gmail.com.
Get access

Abstract

Public participation is commonly advocated for as part of policy responses to climate change. This study examines the prospects for inclusive approaches to climate change adaptation, drawing particularly on studies of long-term climate change adaptation in a coastal region in Bangladesh. It has been suggested that public perception, knowledge, and participation are important goals in the process of formulating response to climate change risks. This study found that local people as well as other stakeholders who participated in the study were more or less familiar with the term “climate change.” However, the participants’ understanding of what the term means and climate change’s causes varied widely. The results also showed that a large number of the participants were uncertain about the solution to the climate change problems they are already experiencing, due to lack of accessible information from different governmental and non-governmental sources. It is notable that, despite being a country with a high level of political commitment to dealing with climate change, supported by plans, programs, and interventions, the people of Bangladesh are largely unaware of these efforts. This study explores the Social Ecological Inventory (SEI) tool as a means of managing the governance system for climate change adaptation in order to explore the public’s perception of, knowledge about, and participation in developing adaptation plans. In this study, we used the SEI tool to systemically map the values, motives, activities, knowledge, and experiences of different actors over time and in different networks in order to prepare the ground for participation in developing climate change adaptation plans by helping identify and select the most appropriate set of actors to work with; build trust between these different actors; and, finally, reach a consensus among actors on how to enhance a region’s sustainability and resilience.

Environmental Practice 18: 32–43 (2016)

Type
Features
Information
Environmental Practice , Volume 18 , Issue 1 , March 2016 , pp. 32 - 43
Copyright
© National Association of Environmental Professionals 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agrawala, S., Ota, T., Ahmed, A.U., Smith, J., and van Aalst, M.. 2003. Development and Climate Change in Bangladesh: Focus on Coastal Flooding and the Sunderbans. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), Paris, France, 13–16.Google Scholar
Ahmad, Q.K., and Ahmed, A.U.. 2003. Regional Cooperation in Flood Management in the Ganges-Brahmaputra-Meghna Region: Bangladesh Perspectives. Natural Hazards 28:191–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahmed, A.U., and Haque, N.. 2002. Climate Change and Sustainable Development. Paper presented at the Dhaka Meet on Sustainable Development, March 14–18. Incorporated in Citizens’ Perspectives on Sustainable Development, Q.K. Ahmad and A.U. Ahmed, eds. Bangladesh Unnayan Parishad (BUP), Dhaka, Bangladesh, 19–21.Google Scholar
Arnstein, S.R. 1969. A Ladder of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Planning Association 35(4):216–224.Google Scholar
Armitage, D., Berkes, F., Dale, A., Kocho-Schellenberg, E., and Patton, E. 2011. Co-management and the Co-production of Knowledge: Learning to Adapt in Canada’s Arctic. Global Environmental Change 21(3):995–1004.Google Scholar
Baird, J., Plummer, R., and Pickering, K.. 2014. Priming the Governance System for Climate Change Adaptation: The Application of a Social-Ecological Inventory to Engage Actors in Niagara, Canada. Ecology and Society 19(1):3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (BBS). 1999. Census of Agriculture 1996. Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (BBS), Dhaka, Bangladesh, 1–3. Available at http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/ess/documents/world_census_of_agriculture/main_results_by_country/bangla_2000.pdf.Google Scholar
Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (BBS). 2006. Statistical Pocketbook of Bangladesh: 2004. Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (BBS), Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh (GOB), Dhaka, Bangladesh, 55–59.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, D., Collins, K., Fry, C., and Munton, R.. 2001. Deliberation and Inclusion: Vehicles for Increasing Trust in UK Public Governance? Environment and Planning C 19(4):501–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunner, R., and Lynch, A.. 2010. Adaptive Governance and Climate Change. American Meteorological Society, Boston, Massachusetts. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-935704-01-0.Google Scholar
Collins, K., and Ison, R.. 2009. Jumping off Arnstein’s Ladder: Social Learning as a New Policy Paradigm for Climate Change Adaptation. Environmental Policy and Governance 19:358–373. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eet.523.Google Scholar
Davos, C.A., and Lajano, R.P.. 2001. Analytical Perspectives of Cooperative Coastal Management. Journal of Environmental Management 62:123–130. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jema.2001.0427.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Diduck, A. 2010. The Learning Dimension of Adaptive Capacity: Untangling the Multi-level Connections. In Adaptive Capacity and Environmental Governance, D. Armitage, and R. Plummer, eds. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 199–223.Google Scholar
Engle, N.L. 2011. Adaptive Capacity and Its Assessment. Global Environmental Change 21(2):647–656. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.01.019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Environment Agency (EA). 2012. Managing Flood Risk Through London and the Thames Estuary. TE2100 Plan, Thames Estuary 2100. Environment Agency, Charlton, London, UK. Available at http://a0768b4a8a31e106d8b050dc802554eb38a24458b98ff72d550b.r19.cf3.rackcdn.com/LIT7540_43858f.pdf.Google Scholar
Evans, J.P. 2012. Environmental Governance. Routledge, New York, New York, 272 pp.Google Scholar
Fankhauser, S., Smith, J.B., and Tol, R.S.J.. 1997. Weathering Climate Change: Some Simple Rules to Guide Adaptation Decisions. Ecological Economics 30:67–78. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(98)00117-7.Google Scholar
Few, R., Brown, K., and Tompkins, E.M.. 2007. Public Participation and Climate Change Adaptation: Avoiding the Illusion of Inclusion. Climate Policy 7:46–59. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3763/cpol.2007.0704.Google Scholar
Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P., and Norberg, J.. 2005. Adaptive Governance of Social-Ecological Systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 30:441–473. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144511.Google Scholar
Füssel, H.M. 2007. Adaptation Planning for Climate Change: Concepts, Assessment Approaches, and Key Lessons. Sustainability Science 2:265–275. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11625-007-0032y.Google Scholar
Füssel, H.M., and Klein, R.J.T.. 2006. Climate Change Vulnerability Assessments: An Evolution of Conceptual Thinking. Climatic Change 75(3):301–329. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-0329-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallopín, G.C. 2006. Linkages Between Vulnerability, Resilience, and Adaptive Capacity. Global Environmental Change 16(3):293–303.Google Scholar
Gunderson, L., and Light, S.S.. 2006. Adaptive Management and Adaptive Governance in the Everglades Ecosystem. Policy Sciences 39:323–334.Google Scholar
Huitema, D., Mostert, E., Egas, W., Moellenkamp, S., Pahl-Wostl, C., and Yalcin, R.. 2009. Adaptive Water Governance: Assessing the Institutional Prescriptions of Adaptive (Co-) Management from a Governance Perspective and Defining a Research Agenda. Ecology and Society 14(1):26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC). 2001. World Disaster Report 2001. Focus on Recovery. Kumarian, Bloomfield, CT, 27–31.Google Scholar
International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC). 2004. World Disasters Report: Focus on Community Resilience. IFRC, Geneva, Switzerland. Available at http://www.ifrc.org/PageFiles/89755/WDR2004/58000-WDR2004-LR.pdf.Google Scholar
International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD). 2003. Livelihoods and Climate Change: Combining Disaster Risk Reduction, Natural Resource Management and Climate Change Adaptation in a New Approach to the Reduction of Vulnerability and Poverty. IISD, Winnipeg, Canada. Available at http://www.iisd.org/pdf/2003/natres_livelihoods_cc.pdf.Google Scholar
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2001. Climate Change 2001: Mitigation, Contribution of Working Group III to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 23–29.Google Scholar
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2007. Climate Change 2007. Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. Available at http://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/wg2/en/contents.html.Google Scholar
Lebel, L., Anderies, J.M., Campbell, B., Folke, C., Hatfield-Dodds, S., Hughes, T.P., and Wilson, J.. 2006. Governance and the Capacity to Manage Resilience in Regional Social-Ecological Systems. Ecology and Society 11(1):19.Google Scholar
Lee, K.N. 1993. Compass and Gyroscope. Integrating Science and Politics for the Environment. Island Press, Washington, DC, 255 pp.Google Scholar
Nelson, D.R., Adger, W.N., and Brown, K.. 2007. Adaptation to Environmental Change: Contributions of a Resilience Framework. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 32:395–419. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.32.051807.090348.Google Scholar
Olsson, P., Gunderson, L.H., Carpenter, S.R., Ryan, P., Lebel, L., Folke, C., and Holling, C.S.. 2006. Shooting the Rapids: Navigating Transitions to Adaptive Governance of Social-Ecological Systems. Ecology and Society 11(1):18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, E. 2007. Sustainable Social-Ecological Systems: An Impossibility? Social Science Research Network, Rochester, New York. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.997834.Google Scholar
Pelling, M., High, C., Dearing, D., and Smith, D.. 2008. Shadow Spaces for Social Learning: A Relational Understanding of Adaptive Capacity to Climate Change Within Organisations. Environment and Planning A 40(4):867–884. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/a39148.Google Scholar
Plummer, R., and Baird, J.. 2013. Adaptive Co-management for Climate Change Adaptation: Considerations for the Barents Region. Sustainability 5:629–642. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su5020629.Google Scholar
Porthin, M., Rosqvist, T., Perrels, A., and Molarius, R.. 2013. Multi-criteria Decision Analysis in Adaptation Decision-Making: A Flood Case Study in Finland. Regional Environmental Change 13(6):1171–1180. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10113-013-0423-9.Google Scholar
Qin, X.S., Huang, G.H., Chakma, A., Nie, X.H., and Lin, Q.G.. 2008. A MCDM-Based Expert System for Climate-Change Impact Assessment and Adaptation Planning. A Case Study for the Georgia Basin, Canada. Expert Systems with Applications 34(3):2164–2179.Google Scholar
Reed, M.S. 2008. Stakeholder Participation for Environmental Management: A Literature Review. Biological Conservation 141:2417–2431. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2008.07.014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reeder, T., and Ranger, N.. 2011. How Do You Adapt in an Uncertain World? Lessons from the Thames Estuary 2100 Project. World Resources Report Uncertainty Series. World Resources Institute, Washington, DC. Available at http://www.wri.org/sites/default/files/uploads/wrr_reeder_and_ranger_uncertainty.pdf.Google Scholar
United Nations Climate Change Secretariat. 1992. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). United Nations Climate Change Secretariat, Bonn, Germany, Available at http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/conveng.pdf.Google Scholar
Walker, B., Holling, C.S., Carpenter, S.R., and Kinzig, A.. 2004. Resilience, Adaptability and Transformability in Social-Ecological Systems. Ecology and Society 9(2):5.Google Scholar
Walters, C., and Holling, C.S.. 1990. Large-Scale Management Experiments and Learning by Doing. Ecology 71:2060–2068. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1938620.Google Scholar
Wheaton, E.E., and Maciver, D.C.. 1999. A Framework and Key Questions for Adapting to Climate Variability and Change. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 4:215–225. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1009660700150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar