Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T06:43:08.000Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Parental Involvement and Multi-Agency Support Services for High-Need Families in France

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2016

Hélène Join-Lambert*
Affiliation:
Centre for Research in Education and Training, University of Paris Ouest Nanterre La Défense E-mail: helene.join-lambert@u-paris10.fr

Abstract

This article examines developments in parenting and family support services in France. Drawing on qualitative empirical studies, the article considers two types of initiatives ‒ the Programmes for Educational Success (PRE) and parenting interventions delivered alongside child protection services. Both of these services are examples of new types of parenting and family support interventions in the French context targeted at ‘children at risk’, seeking to address and prevent problems of educational underachievement, youth offending, poor health in children and young people and child neglect and maltreatment. The article critically reviews tensions between principles of more responsive, partnership-based family support and more prescriptive parenting education and family interventions. Drawing on empirical findings, the article examines frontline practice and professional‒family relationships, highlighting the significance of ‘parental involvement’ practice and conflicting professional and parental perspectives about children's needs, family support and professional–client relationships.

Type
Themed Section on Intensive Family Support Services: Politics, Policy and Practice Across Contexts
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barbe, L. (2006) Another Place for Service Users? Working in the Social and Medical‒Social Sector, Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar
Bergonnier-Dupuy, G. and Esparbès-Pistre, S. (2007) ‘Family support for adolescents’ educational attainment in secondary schooling: father's and mother's perceptions’, Les Sciences de l'Education pour l'Ere nouvelle, 40, 4, 2141.Google Scholar
Boddy, J. and Statham, J. (2009) European Perspectives on Social Work: Models of Education and Professional Roles, London: Institute of Education.Google Scholar
Boddy, J., Statham, J., Danielsen, I., Geurts, E., Join-Lambert, H. and Euillet, S. (2014) ‘Beyond Contact? Policy approaches to work with families of looked after children in four European countries’, Children and Society, 28, 2, 152–61.Google Scholar
Boddy, J., Statham, J., Smith, M., Ghate, D., Wigfall, V. and Hauari, H. (2009) International Perspectives on Parenting Support: Non-English Language Sources, DCSF-RR114, London: Institute of Education.Google Scholar
Bond-Taylor, S. (2015) ‘Dimensions of family empowerment in work with so-called “troubled” families’, Social Policy and Society, 14, 3, 371–84.Google Scholar
Breugnot, P. (2011) Socio-Pedagogical Innovations: Innovative Practices and Services in Child Protection, Rennes: Presses de l'École des Hautes Études en Santé Publique.Google Scholar
Chemin, A. (2010) ‘Removing family allowances: a wrong idea’, Le Monde, 18 June, http://www.lemonde.fr/idees/article/2010/06/18/suppression-des-allocations-familiales-la-fausse-bonne-idee_1375006_3232.html#8hXixKePtXVH27i6.99 [accessed 18.02.2015].Google Scholar
Dolan, P., Pinkerton, J. and Canavan, J. (eds.) (2006) Family Support as Reflective Practice, London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.Google Scholar
Fablet, D. (2008) ‘The emergence of the notion of parenthood in professional circles’, Sociétés et jeunesses en difficulté, Revue pluridisciplinaire de recherche, 5, spring, http://sejed.revues.org/3532 [accessed 13.11.2015].Google Scholar
Fagnani, J. (2012) ‘Recent reforms in childcare and family policies in France and Germany: what was at stake?’, Children and Youth Services Review, 34, 3, 509–16.Google Scholar
Hamel, M. P. and Lemoine, S. (eds.) (2012) Help Parents to be Parents: An International Perspective on Parenting Support, Paris: Centre d'analyse stratégique.Google Scholar
Join-Lambert, H. (ed.) (2012) Day Care Services in Child Protection: A New Place for Parents?, Paris: L'Harmattan.Google Scholar
Join-Lambert, H. (2013) ‘Co-education: parents and professionals, how do they co-operate?’, in Bergonnier-Dupuy, G., Join-Lambert, H. and Durning, P. (eds.), Traité de l’éducation familiale, Paris: Dunod.Google Scholar
Join-Lambert Milova, H. and Sohre, S. (2012) ‘Key concepts of parenting support in France and Germany’, International Journal of Child and Family Welfare, 14, 3/4, 105–18.Google Scholar
Jossy-Rissoan, O., Glasman, D., Berthet, J. M. and Kapko, N. (2006) Program for Educational Success: Implementation and Future Perspectives, Report for the Délégation Interministérielle à la Ville, Chambéry: Université de Haute Savoie.Google Scholar
Jourdain-Menninger, D., Roussille, B., Vienne, P. and Lannelongue, C. (2006) Study on the Mother and Child Protection in France, Report by l'Inspection Générale des Affaires Sociales, Paris: Journal Officiel.Google Scholar
Martin, C. (2010) ‘The reframing of family policies in France: processes and actors’, Journal of European Social Policy, 20, 5, 410–21.Google Scholar
Neyrand, G. (2012) Supporting and Controlling the Parents: Parenting Services, Toulouse: Erès.Google Scholar
Périer, P. (2005) ‘Partnerships without partners? Working-class families engaging with school participation’, La Revue internationale de l'éducation familiale, 9, 1, 87103.Google Scholar
Pioli, D. (2006) ‘Parenting support: between emancipation and control’, Sociétés et jeunesses en difficulté, Revue pluridisciplinaire de recherche 1, http://sejed.revues.org/document106.html [accessed 05.01.2015].Google Scholar
Rousseau, P. (2007) Practice of Writing and Writing on Practice, Paris: L'Harmattan.Google Scholar
Sellenet, C. (2010) ‘The art of preparing parents in the Law of 2007’, Les Cahiers Dynamiques, 4, 49, 8696.Google Scholar