Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T05:17:01.788Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Genre and Capital in Avant-garde Electronica

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2016

Eliot Britton*
Affiliation:
Music Composition, Department of Music Research, McGill University, Montreal

Abstract

This article applies a genre level approach to the tangled discourse surrounding the points of convergence between avant-garde electronica and electroacoustic music. More specifically the article addresses related experimental practices in these distinct yet related fields of electronic music-making. The democratisation of music technology continues to expand into an increasingly diverse set of musical fields, destabilising established power dynamics. A flexible, structured approach to the analysis of these relationships facilitates the navigation of crumbling boundaries and shifting relationships. Contemporary electronic music’s overlapping networks encompass varying forms of capital, aesthetics, technology, ideology, tools and techniques. These areas offer interesting points of convergence. As the discourse surrounding electronic music expands, so must the vocabulary and conceptual models used to describe and discuss new areas of converging artistic practice. Genre level diagrams selectively collapse, expand and arrange artistic fields, facilitating concrete, coherent arguments and the examination of patterns and relationships. Through the genre level diagram’s establishment of distinct yet flexible boundaries, electronic music’s sprawling discourse can be cordoned off, expanded or contracted to suit structured analyses. In this way, this approach clarifies scope and facilitates simultaneous examination from a variety of perspectives.

Type
Articles
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bourdieu, P. 1993. The Field of Cultural Production: Essays on Art and Literature. Ed. R. Johnson. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Brackett, D. n.d. Genre. In Categorizing Sound: Genre and Identity in Twentieth-Century Popular Music. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Brackett, D. 2005. The Pop, Rock, and Soul Reader: Histories and Debates. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Butler, M. 2001. Turning the Beat Around: Reinterpretation, Metrical Dissonance, and Asymmetry in Electronic Dance Music. 1 January. www.mtosmt.org/issues/mto.01.7.6/mto.01.7.6.butler.html (accessed 15 December 2014).Google Scholar
Chadabe, J. 2000. Remarks on Computer Music Culture. Computer Music Journal 24(4): 911.Google Scholar
Cox, C. and Warner, D. 2009. Audio Culture: Readings in Modern Music. Ed. Nachdr. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Demers, J. 2010. Listening through the Noise: The Aesthetics of Experimental Electronic Music. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FactMag, T. 2015. Amon Tobin is Releasing a Space-inspired EP Encased in a White Rubber Wheel. 18 March. www.factmag.com/2015/03/18/amon-tobin-dark-jovian-ep-white-vinyl-rubber-wheel-record-store-day/ (accessed 24 September 2015).Google Scholar
Manning, P. 2003. Electronic and Computer Music. rev. and exp. edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Neill, B. 2002. Pleasure Beats: Rhythm and the Aesthetics of Current Electronic Music. Leonardo Music Journal 12: 36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Normandeau, R. 2005. Puzzle (2003). On Puzzles. Empreintes DIGITALes, IMED 0575.Google Scholar
Reynolds, S. 2012. Energy Flash: A Journey through Rave Music and Dance Culture. updated edn. Berkeley, CA: Soft Skull Press.Google Scholar
Senécal, P. 2014. Robert Normandeau. www.camuz.ca/entrevue/robert-normandeau (accessed 23 September 2015).Google Scholar
Tagg, P. 1982. Analysing Popular Music: Theory, Method And Practice. Popular Music 2: 3765.Google Scholar
Theberge, P. 1997. Any Sound you can Make: Making Music Consuming Technology. Hanover, NH: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar