Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T07:25:05.339Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Coerced coordination, not cooperation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 March 2016

Montserrat Soler  and
Hillary L. Lenfesty
Montserrat Soler
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Montclair State University, Montclair, NJ 07043solerm@mail.montclair.eduhttps://sites.google.com/site/montserratsoleranthro/
Hillary L. Lenfesty
Affiliation:
Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-1104. lenfesty@asu.eduhttps://asu.academia.edu/HillaryLenfesty
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Norenzayan et al. propose that Big God (BG) religions are large-group cooperative enterprises that promote internal harmony and higher fertility, resulting in “mutually beneficial exchanges” for those involved. We examine the possible distributions of costs and benefits within BG religions and propose that they are, instead, successful coordinating mechanisms that rely on intragroup competition and exploitation between the classes and sexes.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 39 , 2016 , e24
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, K. G. (2006) How well does paternity confidence match actual paternity? Current Anthropology 47:513–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnqvist, G. (2006) Sensory exploitation and sexual conflict. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 361(1466):375–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Atran, S. (2003) Genesis of suicide terrorism. Science 299(5612):1534–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bastian, B., Jetten, J. & Ferris, L. J. (2014) Pain as social glue: Shared pain increases cooperation. Psychological Science 25:2079–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohn, N. (2011) The pursuit of the millennium: Revolutionary millenarians and mystical anarchists of the Middle Ages. Random House.Google Scholar
David, A. R. (1997) The pyramid builders of ancient Egypt: A modern investigation of Pharaoh's workforce. Routledge.Google Scholar
Fischer, R., Callander, R., Reddish, P. & Bulbulia, J. (2013) How do rituals affect cooperation? Human Nature 24(2):115–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gabriel, R. (2006) Soldier's lives through history: The ancient world. Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Guilford, T. & Dawkins, M. S. (1991) Receiver psychology and the evolution of animal signals. Animal Behaviour 42(1):1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guterman, M., Mehta, P. & Gibbs, M. (2007) Menstrual taboos among major religions. The Internet Journal of World Health and Societal Politics 5(2).Google Scholar
Irons, W. (2001) Religion as a hard-to-fake sign of commitment. In: Evolution and the capacity for commitment, ed. Nesse, R., pp. 292–309. Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Luther, M. (1517/1915) Disputation of Doctor Martin Luther on the power and efficacy of indulgences. In: Works of Martin Luther, vol. 1. ed. & trans. Spaeth, A., Reed, L. D., Jacobs, H. E., Jacobs, C. M., Steinhaeuser, A. T. W., Neve, J. L., Schindel, J. J., Schmauk, T. E., Steimle, A., Lambert, W. A. , pp. 29–38. A. J. Holman Company. (Original work published 1517). Available at: http://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/274/pg274.html.Google Scholar
Nettle, D. & Pollet, T. V. (2008) Natural selection on male wealth in humans. The American Naturalist 172(5):658–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ryan, M. J. & Rand, A. S. (1993) Sexual selection and signal evolution: The ghost of biases past. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 340(1292):187–95.Google Scholar
Soler, M. (2012) Costly signaling, ritual and cooperation: Evidence from Candomblé, an Afro-Brazilian religion. Evolution and Human Behavior 33(4):346–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soler, M., Batiste, F. & Cronk, L. (2014) In the eye (and ears) of the beholder: Receiver psychology and human signal design. Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews 23(4):136–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sosis, R. (2003) Why aren't we all Hutterites? Human Nature 14(2):91–127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed