Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-17T20:30:47.243Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Polar science strategies for institute managers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2015

C.P. Summerhayes*
Affiliation:
Scott Polar Research Institute, University of Cambridge, Lensfield Road, Cambridge CB2 1ER (cps32@cam.ac.uk)

Abstract

Managing polar research is a tremendous challenge. It covers work at sea on rough and intimidating oceans, and on land over crevassed terrain or rotten sea ice with the prospect of death or frostbite. These environments are extremely hostile and difficult to work in. Results are costly to obtain, and yet the work is of vital importance, as the polar regions are the world's freezers, critical components of the climate system, and repositories of amazing biodiversity. These regions are grossly undersampled, and relatively poorly monitored. National efforts are best carried out in an international framework, in which cooperation is essential for major breakthroughs, and the exchange and sharing of data and information and facilities is essential for ongoing monitoring of change. Under the circumstances the managers of polar research institutes must proceed with well-developed strategies. Given the growing interest of different countries in the polar regions, it would seem useful to bring together advice won through hard effort over the years in how best to develop strategies for polar scientific institute management. This discussion paper offers advice on how such strategies may best be developed.

The author has compiled this based on many years of management experience in both the ocean and polar sciences with the following institutions: the UK Natural Environment Research Council's Institute of Oceanographic Sciences Deacon Laboratory, the UK's National Oceanography Centre, UNESCO's Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission, and the International Council for Science's Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Australian Antarctic Division. 2011. Australian Antarctic Science strategic plan 2011–12 to 2020–21. Hobart: Australian Antarctic Division (URL: www.antarctica.gov.au).Google Scholar
Chown, S.L., Lee, J.E., Hughes, K.A.and others. 2012, Challenges to the future conservation of the Antarctic. Science, 337: 158159 and (URL: www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/337/6091/PAGE/DC1).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finney, K. 2013. Data and information management strategy (DIMS), 2009–2013. Cambridge: SCAR (SCAR report 34).Google Scholar
Kennicutt, M.C., 2009. Future directions in Antarctic science: implications for national programs. Punta Arenas: COMNAP (Invited paper for COMNAP meeting, Punta Arenas, 3 August 2009. Unpublished. Available on request from SCAR or COMNAP Secretariats).Google Scholar
Kennicutt, M.C., and others. 2014a. A roadmap for Antarctic and Southern Ocean science for the next two decades and beyond. Antarctic Science. doi:10.1017/S0954102014000674.Google Scholar
Kennicutt, M.C., Chown, S.L., Cassano, J.J.and others. 2014b. Six priorities for Antarctic science. Comment. Nature 512: 2325 (plus supplementary material : 1–5).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krupnik, I., Allison, I., Bell, R.and others (editors). 2011. Understanding Earth's polar challenges: International Polar Year 2007–2008. Edmonton: CCI Press (occasional publication series 69).Google Scholar
Reid, W., Chen, V.D., Goldfarb, L.and others. 2010, Earth system science for global sustainability: grand challenges. Science 330:916917.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
WMO (World Meteorological Organization). 2011. WMO Polar activities. Geneva: WMO (Item 11.9 from the general summary report of the XVIth WMO congress, Geneva).Google Scholar