Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T08:50:12.525Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Reply

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 1998

M. MURPHY ,
K. HEY ,
M. O’DONNELL ,
B. WILLIS  and
J. D. ELLIS
M. MURPHY
Affiliation:
Unit of Health Care Epidemiology, University of Oxford and ICRF General Practice Research Group, Radcliffe Infirmary, Oxford
K. HEY
Affiliation:
Anglia and Oxford Regional Health Authority, Headington, Oxford
M. O’DONNELL
Affiliation:
Anglia and Oxford Regional Health Authority, Headington, Oxford
B. WILLIS
Affiliation:
Maternity Unit, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford and Royal Berkshire Hospital, Reading
J. D. ELLIS
Affiliation:
Maternity Unit, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

James questions the validity of the very tentative statement made in the final sentence of our paper. Our claim concerned the proportion of twins in Britain in the 1990s that might have arisen through subfertility treatment and was linked to the s uggestion that the natural twinning rate might still be in decline. If this were true, we, like James, would regard that prospect with concern.

Type
DEBATE
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 30 , Issue 1 , January 1998 , pp. 127 - 133
Copyright
© 1998 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)