Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T09:38:51.794Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Changing Hegemonic Strategies of Business in Turkey before and after the Neoliberal Turn: from Defense to Counter-Attack

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 November 2015

MELİH YEŞİLBAĞ
MELİH YEŞİLBAĞ*
Affiliation:
Melİh Yeşİlbağ is a Ph. D. candidate in Sociology at Binghamton University and a research assistant in the Sociology Department at Ankara University. Contact Information: Ankara University, Sociology Department, Ankara Üniversitesi Dil ve Tarih Coğrafya Fakültesi, Sosyoloji Bölümü, Ankara, Turkey, 06100. Email: myesilb1@binghamton.edu.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Articles
Information
Enterprise & Society , Volume 17 , Issue 1 , March 2016 , pp. 116 - 150
Copyright
Copyright © The Author 2015. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Business History Conference. All rights reserved. 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bibliography of Works Cited

Primary Sources

Issues of İşveren from 1964 to 2013.Google Scholar
Issues of MESS İşveren from 1963 to 2013 Google Scholar
Issues of Mercek from 1996 to 2013.Google Scholar
Issues of MESS Kısa Bilgi Bülteni Google Scholar
Issues of Biz Bize from 2001 to 2013. Google Scholar
MESS, Medya’da MESS 6. Mess Yayınları, 1999. Google Scholar
MESS, Medya’da MESS 7. Mess Yayınları, 2000. Google Scholar
MESS, Gelenek ve Gelecek. Mess Yayınları, 1999 .Google Scholar

Books

Adamson, Walter L. Hegemony and Revolution: A Study of Antonio Gramsci's Political and Cultural Theory. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Arslan, Ümit Tümay. Bu Kabuslar Neden Cemil?: Yeşilçam’da Erkeklik ve Mazlumluk. Istanbul: Metis, 2005.Google Scholar
Bali, Rıfat N. Tarz-ı hayat'tan life style'a. Istanbul: İletişim, 2002.Google Scholar
Bauer, Raymond Augustine, Pool, Ithiel de Sola, and Dexter, Lewis Anthony. American Business and Public Policy: The Politics of Foreign Trade. With a new prologue. Chicago: Aldine Transaction Publishers, 1964.Google Scholar
Blyth, Mark. Great Transformations: Economic Ideas and Institutional Change in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boratav, Korkut, Türkiye İktisat Tarihi 1908-2009. Ankara: İmge, 2014.Google Scholar
Buğra, Ayşe. State and Businessmen in Turkey: A Comparative Study. Albany, NY: SUNY Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Buğra, Ayşe and Osman Savaşkan. New Capitalism in Turkey: The Relationship between Politics, Religion and Business. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, 2014.Google Scholar
Collier, David. The New Authoritarianism in Latin America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Court, Jamie. How Corporate Power Steals Your Personal Freedom… and What You Can Do About It. New York: Penguin, 2004.Google Scholar
Dahl, , Alan, Robert. Who Governs?: Democracy and Power in an American City. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Domhoff, G. William. Who Rules America?: Power, Politics, and Social Change. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2006.Google Scholar
Duménil, Gérard, and Lévy, Dominique. Capital Resurgent: Roots of the Neoliberal Revolution. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Edsall, , Byrne, Thomas. The New Politics of Inequality. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 1985.Google Scholar
Gramsci, Antonio. Selections from the Prison Notebooks. Edited and translated by Quintin Hoare and Geoffrey Nowell Smith. New York: International, 1971.Google Scholar
Harvey, David. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirschman, Albert. A Bias for Hope: Essays on Development and Latin America. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Jesson, Bruce, Ryan, Allanah, and Spoonley, Paul. Revival of the Right: New Zealand Politics in the 1980s. Auckland: Heinemann Reed, 1988.Google Scholar
Kazgan, Gülten. Yeni ekonomik düzen'de Türkiye'nin yeri. Istanbul: Altın Kitaplar Yayınevi, 1994.Google Scholar
Kozalanka, Kirsten. “Political Communication and the Construction of Neo-liberal Hegemonic Project: Ontario in Transition 1995-1997.” Ph.d thesis, Carleton University, 2003.Google Scholar
McNally, David. Global Slump: The Economics and Politics of Crisis and Resistance. Oakland, CA: PM Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Mills, C. Wright. The Power Elite. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Munck, Ronaldo. Globalization and Labour: The New “Great Transformation.” London: Zed Books, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ozan, Ebru Deniz. Gülme Sırası Bizde: 12 Eylül’e Giderken Sermaye Sınıf, Kriz ve Devlet. Istanbul: Metis, 2012.Google Scholar
Özgüden, Doğan. “Türkiye’de Sol Yayıncılığın Gelimesi.” In Sosyalizm ve Toplumsal Mücadeleler Ansiklopedisi.Google Scholar
Öztürk, Özgür. Türkiye’de Büyük Sermaye Grupları: Finans Kapitalin Oluşumu ve Gelişimi. SAV, 2010.Google Scholar
Plehwe, Dieter, Bernhard, J. A. Walpen, and Neunhöffer, Gisela, eds. Neoliberal Hegemony: A Global Critique. New York: Routledge, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poulantzas, Nicos. Political Power and Social Classes. New York: Verso Books, 1973.Google Scholar
Silva, Eduardo. The State and Capital in Chile: Business Elites, Technocrats, and Market Economics. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1996.Google Scholar
STMA-6. Sosyalizm ve Toplumsal Mücadeleler Ansiklopedisi, cilt 6, İstanbul:İletişim, 1988.Google Scholar
Therborn, Göran. What Does the Ruling Class Do When It Rules?: State Apparatuses and State Power Under Feudalism, Capitalism and Socialism. London: Verso, 1980.Google Scholar
Voir Guillermo, O’Donnell.Modernization and Bureaucratic Authoritarianism. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1979.Google Scholar

Articles and Book Chapters

Adaklı, Gülseren. “Popüler İkon Olarak Sermayedar: Sakıp Sabancı.” Praksis (2001): 242–266.Google Scholar
Atılgan, Gökhan. “Türkiye’de Toplumsal Sınıflar (1923-2010).” In 1920’den Günümüze Türkiye’de Toplumsal Yapı ve Değişim, edited by Faruk Alpkaya, ve Bülent Duru, 269–312. Ankara: Phoenix, 2012.Google Scholar
Block, Fred. “The Ruling Class Does Not Rule: Notes on the Marxist Theory of the State.” Socialist Revolution 33, no.6 (1977): 6–28.Google Scholar
Brenner, Neil, Peck, Jamie, and Theodore, Nik. “Variegated Neoliberalization: Geographies, Modalities, Pathways.” Global Networks 10, no. 2 (2010): 182–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buğra, Ayşe. “İşadamları ve Toplum.” Toplum ve Bilim 104 (2005): 14–21.Google Scholar
Can, Kemal. “Ülkücü Hareketin İdeolojisi.” Modern Türkiye’de Siyasi Düşünce, Milliyetçilik, edited by Bora, Tanıl and Gültekingil, Murat, 663–685. İstanbul: İletişim, 2005.Google Scholar
Dreier, Peter. “Capitalists vs. the Media: An Analysis of an Ideological Mobilization Among Business Leaders.” Media, Culture & Society 4, no. 2 (1982): 111–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duru, Bülent. “Türkiye Nüfusunda Yeni Eğilimler: Görünüm, Sorunlar, Politikalar.” In 1920’den Günümüze Türkiye’de Toplumsal Yapı ve Değişim, edited by Alpkaya, Faruk and Duru, Bülent, 129-148. Ankara: Phoenix, 2012.Google Scholar
Ercan, Fuat. “Sermayeyi Haritalandırmaya Yönelik Kavramsal Düzenekler.” Praksis 19 (2009): 9–53.Google Scholar
Erten, A. Bağış. “Türkiye’de 68.” In Modern Türkiye’de Siyasi Düşünce: Sol., edited by Bora, Tanıl, and Gültekingil, Murat, 834–847. İstanbul: İletişim, 2007.Google Scholar
Fourcade-Gourinchas, Marion, and Babb, Sarah L.. “The Rebirth of the Liberal Creed: Paths to Neoliberalism in Four Countries.” American Journal of Sociology 108, no. 3 (2002): 533–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gates, Leslie C. “Theorizing Business Power in the Semiperiphery: Mexico 1970-2000.” Theory and Society 38, no. 1 (2009): 57–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, Stephen. “New Constitutionalism, Democratisation and Global Political Economy.” Global Change, Peace & Security 10, no. 1 (1998): 23–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Stuart. “Toad in the Garden: Thatcherism Among the Theorists.” In Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, edited by Nelson, Cary and Grossberg, Lawrence, 35-73. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Harvey, David. “The 'New' Imperialism: Accumulation by Dispossession.” Socialist Register 40, no. 40 (2009).Google Scholar
Kurtulmuş, Meryem, Kurtar, Tanyılmaz, and Kaygısız, Irfan. “Türkiye İşçi Sınıfının Maddi Varlığı ve Değişen Yapısı.” In Marksizm ve Sınıflar: Dünyada ve Türkiye’de Sınıflar ve Mücadeleleri, edited by Savran, S., Tonak, E.A., and Tanyılmaz, K., 251-280. Istanbul: Yordam Kitap, 2014.Google Scholar
Levy, David L., and Egan, Daniel. “A Neo-Gramscian Approach to Corporate Political Strategy: Conflict and Accommodation in the Climate Change Negotiations.” Journal of Management Studies 40.4 (2003): 803–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Öngen, Tülin. “Political Crisis and Strategies for Crisis Management” In The Politics of Permanent Crisis: Class, Ideology and State in Turkey, edited by Balkan, N. and Savran, S., 55–82. Huntington, NY: Nova Science Publishers, 2002.Google Scholar
Öztürk, Özgür. “Türkiye’de Sendikal Mücadele, Sermaye Birikimi, MESS ve Koç Holding.” Praksis 19 (2009): 337–361.Google Scholar
Peck, Jamie, Theodore, Nik, and Brenner, Neil. “Postneoliberalism and Its Malcontents.” Antipode 41, no. s1 (2010): 94–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ratcliff, Richard E. “Capitalists in Crisis: The Chilean Upper Class and the September 11 Coup.” Latin American Perspectives 1, no. 2 (1974): 78–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saraçoğlu, Cenk, “Haziran 2013 Sonrası Türkiye’de İdeolojiler Alanının Dönüşümü: Gezi Direnişi’ni Anlamanın Yöntemleri Üzerine Bir Tartışma.” Praksis 37 (2015): 299–321.Google Scholar
Savran, Sungur. “The Legacy of the Twentieth Century.” In The Politics of Permanent Crisis: Class, Ideology and State in Turkey, edited by Balkan, N. and Savran, S., 1–20. Huntington, NY: Nova Science Publishers, 2002.Google Scholar
Şenses, Fikret. “Turkey’s Experience with Neoliberal Policies Since 1980 in Retrospect and Prospect.” New Perspectives on Turkey no. 47(2012): 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silva, Eduardo. “Capitalist Coalitions, the State, and Neoliberal Economic Restructuring: Chile, 1973–88.” World Politics 45, no. 04 (1993): 526–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanyılmaz, Kurtar. “Türkiye Burjuvazisinde Derin Çatlak.” In Neoliberalizm İslamcı Sermayenin Yükselişi ve AKP, edited by Balkan, N., Balkan, E., and Öncü, A., 143–179. İstanbul: Yordam Kitap, 2014.Google Scholar
Tokyol, Ayşe. “İşveren Sendikaları.” In 75 Yılda Çarkları Döndürenler, edited by Baydar, Oya and Dinçel, Gülay, 299–305. İstanbul: Tarih Vakfı 2003.Google Scholar
Trowbridge, Shannon, O’Neil. “The Role of Ideas in Neoliberal Economic Reform: The Case of Argentina.” Latin American Studies Association, Washington, DC (2001): 5–9.Google Scholar
Ünüvar, Kerem. “Öğrenci Hareketleri ve Sol.” In Modern Türkiye’de Siyasi Düşünce: Sol. Edited by Bora, Tanıl and Gültekingil, Murat, 830–834. İstanbul: İletişim 2007.Google Scholar
Yalman, Galip. “The Turkish State and Bourgeoisie in Historical Perspective: a Relativist Paradigm or a Panoply of Hegemonic Strategies?” In The Politics of Permanent Crisis: Class, Ideology and State in Turkey, edited by Balkan, Nesecan and Savran, Sungur, 21–54.Huntington, NY: Nova Science Publishers, 2002.Google Scholar
Zeitlin, Maurice, Ann Ewen, Lynda, and Ratcliff, Richard Earl. “'New Princes’ for Old? The Large Corporation and the Capitalist Class in Chile." American Journal of Sociology (1974): 87–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Unpublished Works

Bartell, Ernest J. “Business Perceptions and the Transition to Democracy in Chile.” Working Paper 184, Helen Kellogg Institute for International Studies, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, 1992.Google Scholar