Starr, Paul, Remedy and Reaction: The Peculiar American Struggle over Health Care Reform, revised ed. (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Brill, Steven, America’s Bitter Pill: Money, Politics, Backroom Deals, and the Fight to Fix Our Broken Healthcare System (New York: Random House, 2015).Google Scholar

Emanuel, Ezekiel, Reinventing American Health Care: How the Affordable Care Act Will Improve our Terribly Complex, Blatantly Unjust, Outrageously Expensive, Grossly Inefficient, Error Prone System (New York: Public Affairs, 2014).Google Scholar

Davidson, Stephen, A New Era in U.S. Health Care: Critical Next Steps under the Affordable Care Act (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Brill, Steven, “Bitter pill: Why medical bills are killing us,” Time, April 4, 2013, http://time.com/198/bitter-pill-why-medical-bills-are-killing-us.Google Scholar

Jenkins, Jeffrey A. and Patashnik, Eric M., “Living legislation in American politics,” in Living Legislation: Durability, Change, and the Politics of American Lawmaking, Jenkins, Jeffrey A. and Patashnik, Eric. M., eds. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2012), pp. 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Patashnik, Eric M. and Zelizer, Julian E., “The struggle to remake politics: Liberal reform and the limits of policy feedback in the contemporary American state,” Perspectives on Politics , 2013, 11(4): 1071–1087, at 1071.Google Scholar

Patashnik and Zelizer, p. 1071.Google Scholar

Patashnik and Zelizer, p. 1075.Google Scholar

Almgren, Gunnar, Health Care Politics, Policy, and Services: A Social Justice Analysis, 2nd ed. (New York: Springer, 2013), p. 365.Google Scholar

Starr, p. 166.Google Scholar

Jacobs, Lawrence R. and Callaghan, Timothy, “Why states expand Medicaid: Party, resources, and history,” Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law , 38(5): 1023–1050, at 1031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burgin, Eileen and Bereznyak, Jacqueline, “Compromising partisans: Assessing compromise in health care reform,” The Forum: A Journal of Applied Research in Contemporary Politics , 2013, 11(2): 209–241.Google Scholar

Starr, p. 3.Google Scholar

Starr, p. 58.Google Scholar

Kingdon, John W., Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies (New York: HarperCollins, 1984), pp. 129–130.Google Scholar

Burgin, Eileen, “Congress, health care, and congressional caucuses: An examination of the Diabetes Caucus,” Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law , 2003, 28(5): 789–820; Thomas R. Oliver and Pamela Paul-Sheehan, “Translating ideas into actions: Entrepreneurial leadership in state health care reforms,” Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 1997, 22(3): 721–788.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Emanuel, p. 127.Google Scholar

Davidson, p. 53.Google Scholar

Starr, p. 200.Google Scholar

Burgin, Eileen, “Congress, health care reform, and reconciliation,” Congress & the Presidency , 2012, 39(3): 270–296.Google Scholar

Hulse, Carl, “A health legislation fail-safe works, but not as expected,” New York Times, March 26, 2010, p. A25,http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/28/us/politics/28cong.html.Google Scholar

Mann, Thomas E. and Ornstein, Norman J., “Introduction,” in Intensive Care: How Congress Shapes Health Policy, Mann, Thomas E. and Ornstein, Norman J., eds. (Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute and The Brookings Institution, 1995), pp. 17–18.Google Scholar

Starr, Paul, The Social Transformation of American Medicine: The Rise of a Sovereign Profession and the Making of a Vast Industry (New York: Basic Books, 1984).Google Scholar

Starr, 2013, p. 3.Google Scholar

Starr, 2013, p. 2.Google Scholar

Starr, 2013, p. 297.Google Scholar

Starr, 2013, p. 297.Google Scholar

Starr, 2013, pp. 125–126.Google Scholar

Starr, 2013, p. 169.Google Scholar

Starr, 2013, pp. 225–230.Google Scholar

Starr, 2013, pp. 230–235.Google Scholar

Starr, 2013, pp. 235–238.Google Scholar

Burgin and Bereznyak.Google Scholar

Starr, 2013, p. 211.Google Scholar

Starr, 2013, pp. 211–215.Google Scholar

Brady, David and Fiorina, Morris, “Congress in the era of the permanent campaign,” in The Permanent Campaign and Its Future, Ornstein, Norman J. and Mann, Thomas E., eds. (Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute, 2000), chap. 1.Google Scholar

Lee, Frances E., Beyond Ideology: Politics, Principles, and Partisanship in the U.S. Senate (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2009), p. 10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Starr, 2013, p. 47.Google Scholar

Starr, 2013, pp. 46–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Starr, 2013, p. 163.Google Scholar

Staff of the Washington Post, Landmark: The Inside Story of America’s New Health-Care Law and What It Means for Us All (New York: PublicAffairs, 2010).Google Scholar

Cohen, Richard E. and Friel, Brian, “Congressional 2009 vote ratings: Politics as usual – Lugar and Bayh rated equally LIBERAL,” Wells County Voice, February 27, 2010, http://wellscountyvoice.com/congressional-vote-ratings-politics-as-usual-lugar-and-bayh-rated-e-p2358-119.htm.Google Scholar

Burgin and Bereznyak, p. 229.Google Scholar

Burgin and Bereznyak, p. 229.Google Scholar

Burgin and Bereznyak, p. 230.Google Scholar

Burgin and Bereznyak.Google Scholar

Starr, 2013, p. 163.Google Scholar

Burgin, 2012.Google Scholar

Davis, Jeff, “How reconciliation would work,” The New Republic, January 18, 2010, https://newrepublic.com/article/72605/how-reconciliation-would-work.Google Scholar

McDonough, John E., Inside National Health Reform (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2011), pp. 92–94.Google Scholar

Burgin, 2012, p. 281.Google Scholar

Herszenhorn, David and Pear, Robert, “Democrats seek to push health bill through house,” New York Times, January 18, 2010, p. A1, http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/19/health/policy/19health.html.Google Scholar

Connolly, William F., James Madison Rules America: The Constitutional Origins of Congressional Partisanship (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2010).Google Scholar

Herszenhorn and Pear.Google Scholar

Burgin, 2012.Google Scholar

Starr, 2013, p. 49.Google Scholar

Starr, 2013, p. 138.Google Scholar

Starr, 2013, p. 139.Google Scholar

Starr, 2013, pp. 103–104.Google Scholar

Starr, 2013, p. 148.Google Scholar

Starr, 2013, p. 149.Google Scholar

Brill, 2015, p. 22.Google Scholar

Brill, 2015, p. 8.Google Scholar

Brill, 2015, p. 411.Google Scholar

Brill, 2015, p. 411.Google Scholar

Brill, 2015, pp. 276–277, 294–297, 307–308.Google Scholar

Brill, 2015, chaps. 5 and 9.Google Scholar

Brill, 2015, pp. 112–117.Google Scholar

Brill, 2015, p. 203.Google Scholar

Brill, 2015, p. 70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brill, 2015, pp. 314–315.Google Scholar

Brill, 2015, p. 212.Google Scholar

Brill, 2015, p. 314.Google Scholar

Brill, 2015, pp. 208–209, 258–259, 266–269, 280–281, 304–306, 337–339, 344–347, 362–364.Google Scholar

New State Ice Company v. Liebmann (1932).Google Scholar

Morgan, Kimberly J. and Campbell, Andrea Louise, “Delegated governance in the Affordable Care Act,” Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law , 2011, 36(3): 387–391, at 387–388.Google Scholar

Brill, 2015, p. 403.Google Scholar

Brill, 2015, pp. 260–264, 421–425.Google Scholar

“Obama: ‘If you like your health care plan, you’ll be able to keep your health care plan,”’ Politifact, http://www.politifact.com/obama-like-health-care-keep/.Google Scholar

Brill, 2015, pp. 206–207.Google Scholar

Brill, 2015, pp. 471–473.Google Scholar

Brill, 2015, p. 93.Google Scholar

Brill, 2015, p. 458.Google Scholar

Brill, 2015, pp. 26–28.Google Scholar

Brill, 2015, pp. 164–166.Google Scholar

Brill, 2015, pp. 217–218.Google Scholar

Brill, 2015, pp. 26–28.Google Scholar

Brill, 2015, p. 402.Google Scholar

Brill, 2015, pp. 337–41.Google Scholar

See Brill, 2015, pp. 340–342.Google Scholar

Brill, 2015, p. 10.Google Scholar

Brill, 2015, pp. 238–239, 282–287, 319–321, 339–340, 353–354, 388–389, 403–405, 446–448.Google Scholar

Brill, 2015, pp. 276–277, 294–297, 307–308.Google Scholar

King, Gary, Keohane, Robert O., and Verba, Sidney, Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994), p. 112.Google Scholar

Brill, 2015, pp. 37–44, 48, 53–54, 73–76, 91, 95–98, 107, 109, 125, 130, 132, 145, 163, 167, 194–196, 256–257, 264–266.Google Scholar

Brill, 2015, pp. 195–196.Google Scholar

Brill, 2015, pp. 264–266.Google Scholar

Brill, 2015, pp. 132–133.Google Scholar

Brill, 2015, p. 133.Google Scholar

Brill, 2015, p. 396.Google Scholar

Brill, 2015, p. 410.Google Scholar

Brill, 2015, p. 413.Google Scholar

Brill, 2015, p. 412.Google Scholar

Brill, 2015, p. 185.Google Scholar

Brill, 2015, p. 70.Google Scholar

Brill, 2015, p. 84.Google Scholar

Brill, 2015, pp. 131, 181.Google Scholar

Emanuel, p. xiii.Google Scholar

Emanuel, pp. 70–77.Google Scholar

Emanuel, chap. 8.Google Scholar

Emanuel, p. 34.Google Scholar

Emanuel, p. 36.Google Scholar

Emanuel, p. 35.Google Scholar

Emanuel, pp. 35–36.Google Scholar

Emanuel, p. 175.Google Scholar

Emanuel, p. 252.Google Scholar

Emanuel, pp. 181–183.Google Scholar

Emanuel, pp. 203–204.Google Scholar

Emanuel, p. 259, emphasis added.Google Scholar

Emanuel, p. 273.Google Scholar

Emanuel, p. 260, emphasis added.Google Scholar

Emanuel, p. 260, emphasis added.Google Scholar

See Brill, 2015, pp. 232, 267, 302.Google Scholar

Emanuel, p. 173, emphasis added.Google Scholar

Budoff, Carrie and Thrush, Glenn, “Pelosi steeled W. H. for health push,” Politico, March 20, 2010, http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0310/34753.html.Google Scholar

“Americans remain split on stalled health care legislation, but some provisions popular among majorities of Democrats, Independents and Republicans,” Kaiser Family Foundation, February 23, 2010, http://kff.org/health-reform/press-release/americans-remain-split-on-stalled-health-care-legislation-but-some-provisions-popular-among-majorities-of-democrats-independents-and-republicans.Google Scholar

Burgin, 2012.Google Scholar

Emanuel, p. 178.Google Scholar

Emanuel, p. 178.Google Scholar

Emanuel, p. 179.Google Scholar

Emanuel, p. 180.Google Scholar

Emanuel, p. 180.Google Scholar

Emanuel, chap. 5.Google Scholar

Emanuel, pp. 155–158.Google Scholar

Davidson, Stephen, Still Broken: Understanding the U.S. Health Care System (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Davidson, 2013, pp. 35–44.Google Scholar

Davidson, 2013, pp. 40–41.Google Scholar

Davidson, 2013, pp. 45–49.Google Scholar

Davidson, 2013, p. 9.Google Scholar

Davidson, 2013, p. 10.Google Scholar

Davidson, 2013, p. 68.Google Scholar

Davidson, 2013, pp. 63–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davidson, 2013, p. 67.Google Scholar

Davidson, 2013, p. 101.Google Scholar

Davidson, 2013, p. 57.Google Scholar

Davidson, 2013, p. 49.Google Scholar

Davidson, 2013, p. 74.Google Scholar

Davidson, 2013, p. 78.Google Scholar

Davidson, 2013, pp. 78–82.Google Scholar

Davidson, 2013, p. 58.Google Scholar

Davidson, 2013, p. 58.Google Scholar

Davidson, 2013, pp. 26–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davidson, 2013, p. 44.Google Scholar

Davidson, 2013, p. 57.Google Scholar

Burgin, 2012, p. 283.Google Scholar

Starr, 2013, p. 266.Google Scholar

Starr, 2013, p. 239.Google Scholar

Starr, 2013, p. 241.Google Scholar

Brill, 2015, p. 7.Google Scholar

Emanuel, pp. 256–257.Google Scholar

Brill, 2015, pp. 30–33.Google Scholar

Zigmond, Jessica, “Reform update: Its funding gutted, IPAB fades into background,” Modern HealthCare, January 24, 2014, http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20140124/NEWS/301249973.Google Scholar