Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-17T18:46:43.683Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Unusual brachiopod fauna from the Middle Triassic algal meadows of Mt. Svilaja (Outer Dinarides, Croatia)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 November 2015

Adam T. Halamski ,
Maria Aleksandra Bitner ,
Andrzej Kaim ,
Tea Kolar-Jurkovšek  and
Bogdan Jurkovšek
Adam T. Halamski
Affiliation:
Institute of Paleobiology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Twarda 51/55, 00-818 Warszawa, Poland 〈ath@twarda.pan.pl〉, 〈bitner@twarda.pan.pl〉, 〈kaim@twarda.pan.pl〉
Maria Aleksandra Bitner
Affiliation:
Institute of Paleobiology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Twarda 51/55, 00-818 Warszawa, Poland 〈ath@twarda.pan.pl〉, 〈bitner@twarda.pan.pl〉, 〈kaim@twarda.pan.pl〉
Andrzej Kaim
Affiliation:
Institute of Paleobiology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Twarda 51/55, 00-818 Warszawa, Poland 〈ath@twarda.pan.pl〉, 〈bitner@twarda.pan.pl〉, 〈kaim@twarda.pan.pl〉
Tea Kolar-Jurkovšek
Affiliation:
Geological Survey of Slovenia, Dimičeva ulica 14, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia 〈tea.kolar@geo-zs.si〉, 〈bogdan.jurkovsek@geo-zs.si〉
Bogdan Jurkovšek
Affiliation:
Geological Survey of Slovenia, Dimičeva ulica 14, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia 〈tea.kolar@geo-zs.si〉, 〈bogdan.jurkovsek@geo-zs.si〉
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Ladinian deposits at Mt. Svilaja in Dalmatia (Outer Dinarides, Croatia) yielded an abundant brachiopod fauna of low diversity interpreted as a parautochthonous assemblage representing an ecosystem of dasycladacean submarine meadow. The fauna consists of four named species and one left in open nomenclature. The most common is the spiriferinide Flabellocyrtia flabellulum Chorowicz and Termier, 1975 (Spiriferinida) accounting for more than 70% of the material. The athyridide Cassianospira humboldtii (von Klipstein, 1845) is the only species known from elsewhere (Anisian of Southern Alps). The new species of Spiriferinida Thecocyrtella dagysii Halamski, Bitner, Kaim, Kolar-Jurkovšek, and Jurkovšek n. sp. differs from other representatives of the genus in having a deep ventral sulcus. Albasphe albertimagni Halamski, Bitner, Kaim, Kolar-Jurkovšek, and Jurkovšek n. gen. n. sp. is a new brachiopod that possesses a dorsal septum with an intra-septal cavity and dorsal submarginal ridges, both features in common with Aalenian Zellania Moore, 1855 from which it differs in lack of the ventral septum and of ventral submarginal ridges. They are interpreted as members of a sparsely recorded paedomorphic evolutionary line of terebratulides with secondarily lost loop, described formally herein as Gwyniidina Halamski and Bitner n. subordo and subdivided into newly emended Dispheniidae Grant, 1988 (Dispheniinae Grant, 1988 with the only genus Disphenia and Albasphinae Halamski and Bitner n. subfam. with Albasphe and Zellania) and Gwyniidae MacKinnon, 2006 (including Recent Gwynia and Simpliciforma). In contrast to previous interpretations, the trocholophe lophophore of Gwynia is interpreted herein as secondarily simplified.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 89 , Issue 4 , July 2015 , pp. 553 - 575
Copyright
Copyright © 2015, The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ager, D.V., 1965, The adaptation of Mesozoic brachiopods to different environments: Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, v. 1, p. 143–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ager, D.V., 1980, The Geology of Europe: London, McGraw-Hill, xix+ 535 pp.Google Scholar
Ager, D.V., 1993, Mesozoic brachiopods and seamounts, in Palfy, J., and Vörös, A., eds., Mesozoic Brachiopods of Alpine Europe (Proceedings of the Regional Field Symposium on Mesozoic Brachiopods, Vörösberény, Hungary, 6–11 September, 1992): Budapest, Hungarian Geological Society, p. 11–13.Google Scholar
Alexander, R.R., 1986, Resistance to and repair of shell breakage induced by durophages in late Ordovician brachiopods: Journal of Paleontology, v. 60, p. 273–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, R.R., 1990, Mechanical strength of shells of selected extant articulate brachiopods: implications for Paleozoic morphologic trends: Historical Biology, v. 3, p. 169–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allan, R.S., 1940, A revision of the classification of the terebratelloid Brachiopoda: Canterbury Museum, Records, v. 4, p. 267–275.Google Scholar
Álvarez, F., and Emig, C.C., 2005, Brachiopoda, in Ramos, M.A., et al., eds., Lophophorata: Phoronida, Brachiopoda. Fauna Ibérica, vol. 27: Madrid, Museo National de Ciencias Naturales, CSIC, p. 57–276.Google Scholar
Álvarez, F., and Rong, J.-Y., 2002, Athyridida, in Kaesler, R.L., ed., Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology. Part H, Brachiopoda, Revised, Volume 4: Rhynchonelliformea (part). Boulder, Colorado, Lawrence, Kansas, The Geological Society of America, Inc. and The University of Kansas, p. 1475–1601.Google Scholar
Angiolini, L., Carabelli, L., and Gaetani, M., 2005, Middle Permian brachiopods from Chios Island (Greece) and their palaeobiogeographical significance: new evidence for a Gondwanan affinity of the Upper Unit: Journal of Systematic Palaeontology, v. 3, p. 169–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, P.G., 1970, The morphology and microstructure of Zellania davidsoni Moore (Brachiopoda), from the Middle Jurassic of England: Palaeontology, v. 13 (4), p. 606–618, pls 118–120.Google Scholar
Baker, P.G., 2006, Zeillerioidea, in Kaesler, R.L., ed., Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology. Part H, Brachiopoda, Revised, Volume 5: Rhynchonelliformea (part), i–xlvi, 1689–2320: Boulder, Colorado, Lawrence, Kansas, The Geological Society of America, Inc., p. 2163–2188.Google Scholar
Balini, M., 2008, Discovery of upper Ladinian ammonoids at the type locality of the Lower Carnian desatoyense Zone (South Canyon, New Pass Range, Nevada): Journal of Paleontology, v. 82, p. 176–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balini, M., Jurkovšek, B., and Kolar-Jurkovšek, T., 2006, New Ladinian ammonoids from Mt. Svilaja (External Dinarides, Croatia): Rivista Italiana di Paleontologia e Stratigrafia, v. 112, p. 383–395, pl 1.Google Scholar
Baliński, A., and Sun, Y., 2008, Micromorphic brachiopods from the Lower Carboniferous of South China, and their life habits: Fossils and Strata, v. 54, p. 105–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bassi, D., and Fugagnoli, A., 2005, Triassic dasycladalean algae from the Dolomites (northern Italy): stratigraphic assessment: Revista Española de Micropaleontología, v. 37, p. 95–103.Google Scholar
Bassler, R.S., 1915, Bibliographic index of American Ordovician and Silurian fossils. Volume 2: Smithsonian Institution, United States National Museum, Bulletin, 92, p. iii–iv, 719–1521, pls 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benatov, S., 2001, Brachiopod biostratigraphy of the Middle Triassic in Bulgaria and comparison with elsewhere in Europe, in Brunton, C.H.C., Cocks, L.R.M., and Long, S.L., eds., Brachiopods Past and Present, the Systematic Association Special Volume Series 63: London, Taylor and Francis, p. 384–393.Google Scholar
Biernat, G., 1959, Middle Devonian Orthoidea of the Holy Cross Mountains and their Ontogeny: Palaeontologia Polonica, v. 10, p. 1–78.Google Scholar
Bitner, M.A., 2011, Xenobrochus norfolkensis (Brachiopoda: Dyscoliidae), a new species from the Norfolk Ridge, New Caledonia, South-West Pacific: Carnets de Géologie / Notebooks on Geology, Brest, Article 2011/05 (CG2011_A05), p. 203–211.Google Scholar
Bitner, M.A., Melnik, V.P., and Zezina, O.N., 2013, New paedomorphic brachiopods from the abyssal zone of the North-eastern Pacific Ocean: Zootaxa, v. 3613, p. 281–288.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bittner, A., 1889, Revision der Brachiopoden von Sct. Cassian: Verhandlungen der k.k. geologischen Reichsanstalt [for 1889], p. 159–170.Google Scholar
Bittner, A., 1890, Brachiopoden der alpinen Trias: Abhandlungen der k.k. geologischen Reichsanstalt, v. 14, p. 1–325, pls I–XLI.Google Scholar
Bittner, A., 1892, Brachiopoden der alpinen Trias, Nachtrag I: Abhandlungen der k.k. geologischen Reichsanstalt, v. 17 (2), p. 1–40, pls I–IV.Google Scholar
Bittner, A., 1900, Brachiopoden aus der Trias des Bakonyer Waldes, in Loczy, L., ed., Resultate der wissenschaftlichen Erforschung des Balatonsees, Erster Band, Physische Geographie des Balatonsees und seiner Umgebung, Erster Teil, Geographische Beschreibung der Balatonsee-Umgebung, samt deren Orographie und Geologie, Anhang, Palaeontologie der Umgebung des Balatonsees, II. Band, I. Abhandlung, 60 pp. E. Hölzel, Wien.Google Scholar
Błażejowski, B., Binkowski, M., Bitner, M.A., and Gieszcz, P., 2011, X-ray microtomography (XMT) of fossil brachiopod shell interiors for taxonomy: Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, v. 56, p. 439–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonuso, N., and Hernandez, E.L., 2013, Middle to Late Triassic brachiopod fauna from the Augusta Mountain Formation, New Pass Range, Central Nevada: Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, v. 45, p. 328.Google Scholar
Boucot, A.J., and Wilson, R.A., 1994, Origin and early radiation of terebratuloid brachiopods: thoughts provoked by Prorensselaeria and Nanothyris: Journal of Paleontology, v. 68, p. 1002–1025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boucot, A.J., Johnson, J.G., and Staton, R.D., 1964, On some atrypoid, retzioid, and athyridoid Brachiopoda: Journal of Paleontology, v. 38, p. 805–822.Google Scholar
Brenchley, P.J., and Harper, D.A.T., 1998, Palaeoecology: ecosystems, environments and evolution: London, Chapman & Hall, xxv+403 pp.Google Scholar
Bucković, D., and Martinuš, M., 2010, Triassic terrestrial phase recorded in the carbonate platform succession of the Karst Dinarides (Croatia): Natura Croatica, v. 19, p. 213–230.Google Scholar
Carson, G.A., 1991, Silicification of fossils, in Allison, P.A., and Briggs, D.E.G., eds., Taphonomy: releasing the data locked in the fossil record: New York, Plenum Press, p. 455–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, J.L., 2006, Suessioidea, in Kaesler, R.L., ed., Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology. Part H, Brachiopoda, Revised, v. 5: Rhynchonelliformea (part). i–xlvi, 1689–2320: Boulder, Colorado and Lawrence, Kansas, The Geological Society of America, Inc. and The University of Kansas, p. 1883–1890.Google Scholar
Carter, J.L., Johnson, J.G., Gourvennec, R., and Hou, H.-F., 1994, A revised classification of the spiriferid brachiopods: Annals of the Carnegie Museum, v. 63, p. 327–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caruthers, A.H., and Stanley, G.D. Jr., 2008, Late Triassic silicified shallow-water corals and other marine fossils from Wrangellia and the Alexander terrane, Alaska and Vancouver Island, British Columbia: Geological Society of America, Special Paper, v. 442, p. 151–179.Google Scholar
Channell, J.E.T., and Kozur, H.W., 1997, How many oceans? Meliata, Vardar, and Pindos oceans in Mesozoic Alpine paleogeography: Geology, v. 25, p. 183–186.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Z.-Q., Kaiho, K., and George, A.D., 2005, Early Triassic recovery of the brachiopod faunas from the end-Permian mass extinction: a global review: Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, v. 224, p. 270–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, J., Chen, Z.-Q., and Tong, J.N., 2010, Palaeoecology and taphonomy of two brachiopod shell beds from the Anisian (Middle Triassic) of Guizhou, Southwest China: recovery of benthic communities from the end-Permian mass extinction: Global and Planetary Change, v. 73, p. 149–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chorowicz, J., and Termier, G., 1975, Une faunule silicifiée nouvelle dans le Trias moyen de la Svilaja (Yougoslavie): Annales de la Société géologique du Nord, v. 95, p. 231–242, pls XX–XXI.Google Scholar
Clapham, M.E., Fraiser, M.L., Marenco, P.J., and Shen, S.-Z., 2013, Taxonomic composition and environmental distribution of post-extinction rhynchonelliform brachiopod faunas: constraints on short-term survival and the role of anoxia in the end-Permian mass extinction: Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, v. 374, p. 284–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cloud, P.E. Jr., 1942, Terebratuloid Brachiopoda of the Silurian and Devonian: Geological Society of America, Special Papers, v. 38, p. 1–182.Google Scholar
Cohen, B.L., 2007, The brachiopod genome, in Selden, P.A., ed., Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology. Part H (Supplement), Brachiopoda Revised: Boulder, Colorado and Lawrence, Kansas, Geological Society of America and University of Kansas, v. 6, p. 2356–2372.Google Scholar
Cooper, A.G., 1955, New genera of Middle Paleozoic brachiopods: Journal of Paleontology, v. 29, p. 45–63.Google Scholar
Cooper, A.G., 1956, New Pennsylvanian brachiopods: Journal of Paleontology, v. 30, p. 521–530.Google Scholar
Cooper, A.G., 1983, The Terebratulacea (Brachiopoda), Triassic to Recent: a study of the brachidia (loops): Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology, v. 50, p. 1–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, A.G., and Grant, R.E., 1977, Permian brachiopods of West Texas, VI: Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology, v. 32, p. 3161–3370.Google Scholar
Crowley, S.F., 1988, Aspects of the diagenesis of the Great Limestone Cyclothem [Ph.D. dissertation]: University of Liverpool, 582 pp.Google Scholar
Dagys, A.S., 1965, Triassic brachiopods of Siberia: Moskva, Nauka, 187 pp., pls I–XXVI. [In Russian].Google Scholar
Dagys, A.S., 1972, Morphology and systematics of Mesozoic retzioid brachiopods: Akademiia Nauk SSSR, Sibirskoe Otdelenie, Institut Geologii i Geofiziki, Trudy, v. 112, p. 94–105. [In Russian].Google Scholar
Dagys, A.S., 1974, Triassic Brachiopods. Morphology, Classification, Phylogeny, Stratigraphical Significance and Biogeography: Akademiia Nauk SSSR, Sibirskoe Otdelenie, Institut Geologii i Geofiziki, Trudy, v. 214, 386 pp. [In Russian].Google Scholar
Dagys, A.S., 1993, Geographical differentiation of Triassic brachiopods: Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, v. 100, p. 79–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, T., 1876, A Monograph of British Fossil Brachiopoda, v. IV, part II, No 1, Supplement to the Jurassic and Triassic species: Monographs of the Palaeontographical Society, v. 30, p. 73–144, pls 9–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delance, J.-H., 1974, Zeilleridés du Lias d’Europe occidentale: Mémoires géologiques de l’Université de Dijon, v. 2, p. 1–406, pls 1–7.Google Scholar
Dercourt, J., Ricou, L.E., and Vrielynck, B., eds., 1993, Atlas Tethys palaeoenvironmental maps: Paris, Commission de la Carte géologique du monde, 307 pp. + maps.Google Scholar
Duméril, A.-M.C., 1805, Zoologie analytique, ou méthode naturelle de classification des animaux, rendue plus facile à l’aide de tableaux synoptiques: Paris, Allais, 344 p.Google Scholar
Emig, C.C., 1992, Functional disposition of the lophophore in living Brachiopoda: Lethaia, v. 25, p. 291–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enos, P., Lehrmann, D.J., Jiayong, W., Youyi, Y., Jiafei, X., Chaikin, D.H., Minzoni, M., Berry, A.K., and Montgomery, P., 2006, Triassic evolution of the Yangtze Platform in Guizhou Province, People’s Republic of China: Geological Society of America, Special Papers, 417, p. 1–105.Google Scholar
Feldman, H.R., 2002, A new species of Coenothyris (Brachiopoda) from the Triassic (Upper Anisian–Ladinian) of Israel: Journal of Paleontology, v. 76, p. 34–42.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, H.R., 2013, Menathyris wilsoni (Brachiopoda), new genus and species from the Middle Triassic (Ladinian) of southern Israel: Annales Societatis Geologorum Poloniae, v. 83, p. 81–85.Google Scholar
Flügel, E., 1991, Triassic and Jurassic marine calcareous algae: a critical review, in Riding, R., ed., Calcareous Algae and Stromatolites: Berlin-Heidelberg, Springer-Verlag, p. 481–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golonka, J., Krobicki, M., Pająk, J., Van Giang, N., and Zuchiewicz, W., 2006, Global Plate Tectonics and Paleogeography of Southern Asia: Kraków, AGH University of Science and Technology, 128 pp.Google Scholar
Grant, R.E., 1972, The lophophore and feeding mechanism of the Productidina (Brachiopoda): Journal of Paleontology, v. 46, p. 213–248.Google Scholar
Grant, R.E., 1976, Permian brachiopods from southern Thailand: Journal of Paleontology, Memoir 9, p. 1–269.Google Scholar
Grant, R.E., 1988, The family Cardiarinidae (Late Paleozoic rhynchonellid Brachiopoda): Senckenbergiana Lethaea, v. 69 (1/2), p. 121–135, pls 1–2.Google Scholar
Grant, R.E., 1993a, The Brachiopod Family Gemmellaroiidae: Journal of Paleontology, v. 67, p. 53–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, R.E., 1993b, Permian brachiopods from Khios Island, Greece: Journal of Paleontology, v. 67, p. 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, R.E., 1995, Upper Permian brachiopods of the Superfamily Orthotetoidea from Hydra Island, Greece: Journal of Paleontology, v. 69, p. 655–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, J.E., 1853, Catalogue of the Mollusca in the collection of the British Museum. Part IV. Brachiopoda Ancylopoda, or lamp shells: London, printed by order of the Trustees. iv+128 p.Google Scholar
Grgasović, T., Kolar-Jurkovšek, T., and Jurkovšek, B., 2007, Preliminary report on Ladinian dasycladalean algae from Mt. Svilaja (Croatia), in Grgasović, T., and Vlahović, I., eds., 9th International Symposium on Fossil Algae - Croatia 2007, Field trip guidebook and abstracts: Zagreb, Hrvatski geološki institut, 226 pp.Google Scholar
Halamski, A.T., 2009, Middle Devonian brachiopods from the northern Part of the Holy Cross Mountains, Poland in relation to selected coeval faunas, part I, Introduction, Lingulida, Craniida, Strophomenida, Productida, Protorthida, Orthida: Palaeontographica, Abteilung A, v. 287, p. 41–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halamski, A.T., and Baliński, A., 2013, Middle Devonian brachiopods from the southern Maïder (eastern Anti-Atlas, Morocco): Annales Societatis Geologorum Poloniae, v. 83, p. 243–307.Google Scholar
Halamski, A.T., and Segit, T., 2006, A transitional stringocephalid from the Holy Cross Mountains, Poland, and its evolutionary and stratigraphic significance: Acta Geologica Polonica, v. 56, p. 171–176.Google Scholar
Hamada, T., Tateno, S., and Suzuki, N., 1991, Three-dimensional reconstruction of fossils with X-ray and computer graphics: Scientific Papers of the College of Arts and Sciences, The University of Tokyo, v. 41, p. 107–118.Google Scholar
Hammer, Ø., Harper, D.A.T., and Ryan, P.D., 2001, PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis: Palaeontologia Electronica, v. 4, p. 1–9.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, J., and Lüter, C., 2009, Shell development, growth and sexual dimorphism in the Recent thecideide brachiopod Thecidellina meyeri sp. nov. from the Lesser Antilles, Caribbean: Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, v. 89, p. 469–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holdaway, H.K., and Clayton, C.J., 1982, Preservation of shell microstructure in silicified brachiopods from the Upper Cretaceous Wilmington Sands of Devon: Geological Magazine, v. 119, p. 371–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iordan, M., 1993, Triassic brachiopods of Romania, in Pálfy, J., and Vörös, A., eds., Mesozoic brachiopods of Alpine Europe: proceedings of the Regional Field Symposium on Mesozoic, Brachiopods, Vörösberény, Hungary, 6–11 September, 1992, Hungarian Geological Society, p. 49–58.Google Scholar
Ivanova, E.A., 1960, Order Spiriferida, in Saryčeva, T.G., ed., Fundamentals of palaeontology, Bryozoans, brachiopods: Moskva, Izdatel’stvo Akademii Nauk SSSR, Moskva, p. 264–286. [In Russian].Google Scholar
Ivanova, E.A., 1972, Main features of spiriferid evolution (Brachiopoda): Paleontologicheskiĭ Zhurnal, v. 1972, p. 28–42. [In Russian].Google Scholar
Jaecks, G.S., Leighton, L.R., Kolar-Jurkovšek, T., Jurkovšek, B., and Jelaska, V., 2003, Phylogenetic analysis of a likely productide from the Triassic, and the implications for survival through the Permo-Triassic extinction interval: Geological Society of America, 2003 Seattle Annual Meeting, Abstracts with Program, 66, p. 230.Google Scholar
Jawecka, K., Zakrzewska, T., and Słodkowska, I., eds., 1987, Mapa przeglądowa Europy – Jugosławia. Skala 1: 1 000 000. Warszawa–Wrocław, Państwowe Przedsiębiorstwo Wydawnictw Kartograficznych.Google Scholar
Jelaska, V., Kolar-Jurkovšek, T., Jurkovšek, B., and Gušic, I., 2003, Triassic beds in the basement of the Adriatic-Dinaric carbonate platform of Mt. Svilaja (Croatia): Geologija, v. 46, p. 225–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jin, J., and Chatterton, B.D.E., 1996, Microbilobata, a new genus of earliest terebratulid brachiopod from the Lower Silurian of northwestern Canada: implications for the origin of higher taxa: Historical Biology, v. 11, p. 43–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johansen, M.B., 1987, Brachiopods from the Maastrichtian-Danian boundary sequence at Nye Kløv, Jylland, Denmark: Fossils and Strata, v. 20, p. 1–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karamata, S., 2006, The geological development of the Balkan Peninsula related to the approach, collision and compression of Gondwanan and Eurasian units, in Robertson, A.H.F., and Mountrakis, D., eds., Tectonic Development of the Eastern Mediterranean Region: London, Geological Society, Special Publications, v. 260, p. 155–178.Google Scholar
Kaulfuss, A., Seidel, R., and Lüter, C., 2013, Linking micromorphism, brooding, and hermaphroditism in Brachiopods: insights from Caribbean Argyrotheca (Brachiopoda): Journal of Morphology, v. 274, p. 361–376.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
King, W., 1850, A monograph of the Permian fossils of England: Palaeontological Society Monograph, v. 3, p. 1–258, 28 pls.Google Scholar
Kochanová, M., and Pevný, J., 1982, Bivalves and brachiopods from Wetterstein Limestones of Ostrý vrch (Malé Karpaty Mts.): Západné Karpaty, séria Paleontológia, v. 8, p. 7–40.Google Scholar
Kotański, Z., 2013, Anisian Dasycladales from Upper Silesia and adjacent regions: Carnets de Géologie, v. 2, p. 1–205.Google Scholar
Kozłowski, R., 1929, Les Brachiopodes gothlandiens de la Podolie polonaise: Palaeontologia Polonica, v. 1, p. 1–254.Google Scholar
Kummel, B., 1979, Triassic, in Robison, R.A., and Teichert, C., eds., Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, volume A: Introduction, Fossilization (taphonomy), Biogeography, and Biostratigraphy, Boulder: Colorado and Lawrence, Kansas, The Geological Society of America, Inc. and The University of Kansas, p. A351–A389.Google Scholar
Kyansep, N.P., 1961, Terebratulida from the Lusitanian stage and the Kimmeridgian of south-western Crimea: Akademiia Nauk SSSR, Geologicheskiĭ muzeĭ im. A.P. Karpinskogo, Trudy, v. 8, p. 1–101, pls 1–8. [In Russian].Google Scholar
Lee, D.E., MacKinnon, D.I., and Smirnova, T.N., 2007, Terebratulidina, in Selden, P.A., ed., Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part H, Brachiopoda, revised, volume 6, p. i–l, 2321–3226: Boulder, Colorado and Lawrence, Kansas, The Geological Society of America, Inc. and The University of Kansas, p. 2801–2816.Google Scholar
Logan, A., MacKinnon, D.I., and Phorson, J.E., 1997, Morphology, distribution, life habits, and phylogenetic affinities of the Recent brachiopod Gwynia capsula (Jeffreys): P.S.Z.N. Marine Ecology, v. 18, p. 239–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lüter, C., 2007, Anatomy, In Selden, P.A., ed., Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part H (supplement), Brachiopoda revised: Boulder, Colorado and Lawrence, Kansas, Geological Society of America and University of Kansas, v. 6, p. 2321–2355.Google Scholar
Lüter, C., 2008, Recent brachiopods collected during the deep-sea cruise SO 168 ZEALANDIA with the research vessel FS SONNE between Mt. Spong (Tasman Sea) and the Chatham Islands (Pacific) in 2002/2003: Fossils and Strata, v. 54, p. 311–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKinnon, D.I., 2001, Ancestry and heterochronic origin of brachiopods of the Superfamily Megathyridoidea (Order Terebratulida): a case of natural selection for equatorial dwarfism?in Brunton, C.H.C., Cocks, L.R.M., and Long, S.L., eds., Brachiopods Past and Present, the systematic association special volume series 63, London: Taylor and Francis, p. 229–239.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, D.I., 2006, Uncertain [Superfamily Gwynioidea], in Kaesler, R.L., ed., Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part H, Brachiopoda, revised, v. 5: Rhynchonelliformea (part). i–xlvi, 1689–2320: Boulder, Colorado and Lawrence, Kansas, The Geological Society of America, Inc. and The University of Kansas, p. 2247.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, D.I., and Lee, D.E., 2006, Loop morphology and terminology in Terebratulida, in Kaesler, R.L., ed., Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part H, Brachiopoda, revised, v. 5: Rhynchonelliformea (part), i–xlvi, 1689–2320: Boulder, Colorado and Lawrence, Kansas, The Geological Society of America, Inc. and The University of Kansas, p. 1974–1993.Google Scholar
Manceñido, M.O., and Damborenea, S.E., 1990, Corallophilous micromorphic brachiopods from the Lower Jurassic of West Central Argentina, in MacKinnon, D.I., Lee, D.E., and Campbell, J.D., eds., Brachiopods through Time, Proceedings of the 2nd International Brachiopod Congress, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand, 5–9 February 1990: Rotterdam, A. Balkema, p. 89–96.Google Scholar
Manceñido, M.O., 2010, Braquiópodos micromórficos coralófilos de la Formación Piedra Pintada (Jurásico inferior, Neuquén, Argentina): una visión actualizada, in X Congreso Argentino de Paleontología y Bioestratigrafía y VII Congreso Latinoamericano de Paleontología, Resúmenes: La Plata, p. 181–182.Google Scholar
Márquez-Aliaga, A., Emig, C.C., and Brito, J.M., 1999, Triassic lingulide brachiopods from the Iberian Range (Spain): Géobios, v. 32, p. 815–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Márquez-Aliaga, A., Emig, C.C., and López-Gómez, J., 2007, Triassic Lingularia (Brachiopoda) from Moya (SE Iberian Ranges, Spain): XXIIIa Jornadas de Paleontología, Caravaca de la Cruz, Murcia, Résumen.Google Scholar
Michalík, J., 1996, Functional morphology – paleoecology of pygopid brachiopods from the Western Carpathian Mesozoic, in Copper, P., and Jin, J., eds., Brachiopods. Proceedings of the International Brachiopod Congress Sudbury, Ontario, Canada, 2–5 September 1995, p. 175–178.Google Scholar
Moore, C., 1855, On new Brachiopoda from the Inferior Oolite of Dundry, &c. Somersetshire Archæological and Natural Society, Proceedings 5 [for 1854], p. 107–124.Google Scholar
Moore, C., 1860, On new Brachiopoda, and on the development of the loop in Terebratella: The Geologist, v. 3, p. 438–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, C., 1867, On abnormal conditions of secondary deposits when connected with the Somersetshire and South Wales Coal-Basin; and on the age of the Sutton and Southerndown Series: Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society, v. 23, p. 449–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muir-Wood, H.M., 1936, A Monograph of the Brachiopoda of the British Great Oolite Series. Part I. The Brachiopoda of the Fuller’s Earth Monographs of the Palaeontographical Society, v. 89 (404) [for 1935], p. 1–144, pls 1–5.Google Scholar
d’Orbigny, A., 1842, Voyage dans l’Amérique méridionale (le Brésil, la République orientale de l’Uruguay, la République Argentine, la Patagonie, la République du Chili, la République de Bolivia, la République du Pérou), exécuté pendant les années 1826, 1827, 1828, 1829, 1830, 1831, 1832, et 1833. Tome 3, 4e partie: Paléontologie, Paris: P. Bertrand and Strasbourg: V. Levrault, 188 p.Google Scholar
Pálfy, J., 1991, Paleoecological significance of Anisian (Middle Triassic) brachiopod assemblages from the Balaton Highland, Hungary, in MacKinnon, D.I., Lee, D.E., and Campbell, J.D., eds., Brachiopods through time. Proceedings of the second International Brachiopod Congress: Rotterdam, A.A. Balkema, p. 241–246.Google Scholar
Pamić, J., Gušić, I., and Jelaska, V., 1998, Geodynamic evolution of the Central Dinarides: Tectonophysics, v. 297, p. 251–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pérez-Huerta, A., 2004, New Carboniferous brachiopods from the eastern Great Basin, Nevada, USA: implications for loop ontogeny and evolution in Late Palaeozoic terebratuloids: Palaeontology, v. 47, p. 1519–1538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pope, J.K., 1982, Some silicified strophomenacean brachiopods from the Ordovician of Kentucky, with comments on the genus Pionomena: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, v. 1066–L, p. 1–30.Google Scholar
Rollier, L., 1915, Synopsis des Spirobranches (Brachiopodes) jurassiques celto-souabes. Première partie (Lingulidés, Spiriféridés): Mémoires de la Société paléontologique suisse, v. 41, p. 1–69.Google Scholar
Rollier, L., 1917, Synopsis des Spirobranches (Brachiopodes) jurassiques celto-souabes. Deuxième partie (Rhynchonellidés): Mémoires de la Société Paléontologique Suisse, v. 42, p. 73–184.Google Scholar
Ruban, D.A., 2006a, Diversity changes of the Brachiopods in the Northern Caucasus: a brief overview: Acta Geologica Hungarica, v. 49, p. 57–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruban, D.A., 2006b, Diversity dynamics of the Triassic marine biota in the Western Caucasus (Russia): a quantitative estimation and a comparison with the global patterns: Revue de Paléobiologie, v. 25, p. 699–708.Google Scholar
Rudwick, M.J.S., 1964, Brood pouches in the Devonian brachiopod Uncites: Geological Magazine, 101, p. 329–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudwick, M.J.S., 1966, Brood pouches in the brachiopod Uncites: a re-interpretation: Geological Magazine, v. 103, p. 465–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandy, M., and Blodgett, R.B., 2011, Mesozoic Brachiopods from Alaska as paleogeographic, paleoecological and tectonic tools in terrane analysis, including additional Western Cordillera localities. AAPG Pacific Section Meeting, Anchorage, Alaska, 8–11 May 2011: AAPG Search and Discovery Article #90125.Google Scholar
Savage, N., 2005, Cardiarinidae Cooper, 1956, Order Uncertain, in Harper, D.A.T., Long, S.L., and McCorry, M., eds., Fifth International Brachiopod Congress: Copenhagen 2005; Abstracts, p. 26–27.Google Scholar
Savage, N., 2006, Uncertain. [Order uncertain, Family Cardiarinidae Cooper, 1956.] 2820, in Selden, P.A., ed., Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, part H: Brachiopoda, revised, v. 6: supplement, i–l, 2321–3226 pp, Boulder Colorado and Lawrence, Kansas, Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press.Google Scholar
Seidel, R., Hoffmann, J., Kaulfuss, A., and Lüter, C., 2012, Comparative histology of larval brooding in Thecideoidea (Brachiopoda): Zoologischer Anzeiger, v. 251, p. 288–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schuchert, C., 1897, A synopsis of American fossil Brachiopoda, including bibliography and synonymy: Bulletin of the United States Geological Survey, v. 87, p. 5–464.Google Scholar
Schuchert, C., and LeVene, C.M., 1929, Brachiopoda (Generum et Genotyporum Index et Bibliographia), in Pompeckj, J.F., ed., Fossilium Catalogus 1: Animalia, pars: 42, Berlin, W. Junk, p. 1–140.Google Scholar
Shen, S.-Z., and Clapham, M.E., 2009, Wuchiapingian (Lopingian, Late Permian) brachiopods from the Episkopi Formation of Hydra island, Greece: Palaeontology, v. 52, p. 713–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shen, S.-Z., Zhang, H., Li, W.-Z., Mu, L., and Xie, J.-F., 2006, Brachiopod diversity patterns from Carboniferous to Triassic in South China: Geological Journal, v. 41, p. 351–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherborne, C.D., 1927, Index Animalium sive index nominum quae ab A.D. MDCCLVIII generibus et speciebus Animalium imposita sunt. Sectio secunda, a Kalendis Ianuariis, MDCCCI usque ad finem Decembris, MDCCCL. Part XII: index haani–implicatus. London, printed by order of the Trustees of the British Museum, p. 2885–3136.Google Scholar
Siblík, M., 1991, Triassic brachiopods from Aghdarband (NE-Iran): Abhandlungen der Geologischen Bundesanstalt, v. 38, p. 165–174.Google Scholar
Simon, E., and Willems, G., 1999, Gwynia capsula (Jeffreys, 1859) and other Recent brachiopods from submarine caves in Croatia: Bulletin de l’Institut royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique, Biologie, v. 69, p. 15–21.Google Scholar
Stampfli, G.M., Borel, G.D., Marchant, R., and Mosar, J., 2002, Western Alps geological constraints on western Tethyan reconstructions: Journal of the Virtual Explorer, v. 7, p. 75–104.Google Scholar
Sudar, M.N., Gawlick, H.-J., Lein, R., Missoni, S., Kovacs, S., and Jovanovic, D., 2013, Depositional environment, age and facies of the Middle Triassic Bulog and Rid formations in the Inner Dinarides (Zlatibor Mountain, SW Serbia): evidence for the Anisian break-up of the Neotethys Ocean: Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie—Abhandlungen, v. 269, p. 291–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun, D.-L., 1980, Triassic Brachiopoda of China: Rivista Italiana di Paleontologia e Stratigrafia, v. 85, p. 1175–1184.Google Scholar
Sun, Y., and Baliński, A., 2008, Silicified Mississippian brachiopods from Muhua, southern China: Lingulids, craniids, strophomenids, productids, orthotetids, and orthids: Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, v. 53, p. 485–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun, Z., Hao, W., Sun, Y., and Jiang, D., 2009, Silicified Anisian (Middle Triassic) spiriferinid brachiopods from Guizhou, South China: Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, v. 54, p. 61–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szulc, J., 2000, Middle Triassic evolution of the Northern Peri-Tethys area as influenced by early opening of the Tethys Ocean: Acta Societatis Geologorum Poloniae, v. 70, p. 1–48.Google Scholar
Tari, V., 2002, Evolution of the northern and western Dinarides: a tectonostratigraphic approach: EGU Stephan Mueller Special Publication Series, v. 1, p. 223–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Termier, H., and Termier, G., 1968, Biologie et écologie des premiers fossils: Paris, Masson, 213 pp.Google Scholar
Torti, V., and Angiolini, L., 1997, Middle Triassic brachiopods from Val Parina, Bergamasc Alps, Italy: Rivista Italiana di Paleontologia e Stratigrafia, v. 103, p. 149–172.Google Scholar
von Kerner, F., 1908, Die Trias am Südrande der Svilaja planina: Verhandlungen der Kaiserlich-Königlichen Geologischen Reichsanstalt, v. 1908, p. 259–289.Google Scholar
von Klipstein, A., 1843–1845, Beiträge zur geologischen Kenntniss der östlichen Alpen, 20 Taf., Giessen, Georg Friedrich Heyer’s Verlag, 312 pp.Google Scholar
Vlahović, I., Tišliar, J., Velić, I., and Matičec, D., 2002, The Karst Dinarides are composed of relics of a single mesozoic platform: facts and consequences: Geologia Croatica, v. 55, p. 171–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vörös, A., 2010, Escalation reflected in ornamentation and diversity history of brachiopod clades during the Mesozoic marine revolution: Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, v. 291, p. 474–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waagen, W.H., 1883, Salt Range fossils. I. Productus-Limestone fossils: Geological Survey of India, Memoirs, Palaeontologia Indica (series 13), v. 4, p. 391–546, pls 29–49.Google Scholar
Williams, A., and Brunton, C.H.C., 1996, Morphological and anatomical terms applied to brachiopods, in Kaesler, R.L., ed., Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, part H, Brachiopoda, revised, 1: Introduction, i–xx, 1–539: Boulder, Colorado and Lawrence, Kansas, The Geological Society of America, Inc. and The University of Kansas, p. 423–440.Google Scholar
Williams, A., and Carlson, S.J., 2007, Affinities of brachiopods and trends in their evolution, in Selden, P.A., ed., Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, part H, Brachiopoda, revised, 6: supplement. i–l, 2321–3226: Boulder, Colorado and Lawrence, Kansas, The Geological Society of America, Inc. and The University of Kansas, p. 2822–2877.Google Scholar
Williams, A., and Wright, A.D., 1961, The origin of the loop in articulate brachiopods: Palaeontology, v. 4, p. 149–176.Google Scholar
Williams, A., Carlson, S.J., Brunton, C.H.C., Holmer, L.E., and Popov, L., 1996, A supra-ordinal classification of the Brachiopoda: Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London, B. v. 351, p. 1171–1193.Google Scholar
Williams, A., Carlson, S.J., and Brunton, C.H.C., 2000, Brachiopod classification, in Kaesler, R.L., ed., Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, part H, Brachiopoda, revised, v. 2: Linguliformea, Craniiformea, and Rhynchonelliformea (part): Boulder, Colorado and Lawrence, Kansas, The Geological Society of America, Inc. and The University of Kansas, p. 1–27.Google Scholar
Xu, G.-R., and Liu, G.-C., 1983, Some problems in the research of Triassic brachiopods, in Yang, Z.-Y., and Yin, H.F., eds., Triassic of the South Qilian Mountains: Beijing, Geological Publishing House, p. 67–83. [In Chinese].Google Scholar
Yang, T.-Y., and Gueiyong, X., 1966, Triassic Brachiopoda of Central Gueizhou (Kueichow) Province, China: Beijing, Industry Press, 122 pp., pls I–XIV. [In Chinese with English summary].Google Scholar
Zakharov, Y.D., and Popov, L.E., 2014, Recovery of brachiopod and ammonoid faunas following the end-Permian crisis: additional evidence from the Lower Triassic of the Russian Far East and Kazakhstan: Journal of Earth Science, v. 25, p. 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zapalski, M. K., and Dohnalik, M., 2013, Blastogeny in tabulate corals: case studies using X-ray microtomography: Lethaia, v. 46, p. 223–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zardini, R., 1988, Geologia e fossili delle Dolomiti di Cortina e dintorni, Nuova edizione a cura di M. Spampani. Edizioni Dolomiti, San Vito di Cadore – Belluno, 45 p.Google Scholar
Zezina, O.N., 1976, A new genus of Recent terebratelloid brachiopod from the sublittoral of the Kurilo-Kamchatka region, in Donnaia Fauna Kraevykh Moreĭ SSSR. Akademiia Nauk SSSR, Institut Okeanologii im: Moskva, P.P. Shirshova, p. 101–105. [In Russian].Google Scholar
Zuschin, M., Stachowitsch, M., and Stanton, R.J. Jr., 2003, Patterns and processes of shell fragmentation in modern and ancient marine environments: Earth-Science Reviews, v. 63, p. 33–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar