Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-17T19:39:45.539Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Transverse dam-break waves

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 October 2014

S. Karimpour Ghannadi
Affiliation:
Department of Civil Engineering and Applied Mechanics, McGill University, Montreal, QC, H3A 0C3, Canada
Vincent H. Chu*
Affiliation:
Department of Civil Engineering and Applied Mechanics, McGill University, Montreal, QC, H3A 0C3, Canada
*
Email address for correspondence: vincent.chu@mcgill.ca

Abstract

Numerical simulations of the transverse dam-break waves (TDWs) produced by the sudden removal of a gate on the side of a waterway are conducted based on the shallow-water equations to find solutions to a family of water-diversion problems. The Froude numbers in the main flow identify the members of the family. The depth and discharge profiles are analysed in terms of Ritter’s similarity variable. For subcritical main flow, the waves are comprised of a supercritical flow expansion followed by a subcritical outflow. For supercritical main flow, on the other hand, the waves are analogous to the Prandtl–Meyer expansion in gas dynamics. The diversion flow rate of two-dimensional TDWs on a flat bed is 55 % greater than the one-dimensional flow rate of Ritter in the limiting case of zero main flow, and approaches the rate of Ritter in the other limit when the value of the Froude number in the main flow approaches infinity. The diversion flow rate over a weir is generally higher than the rate over a flat bed depending on the Froude number of the main flow. These numerical simulation results are consistent with laboratory observations.

Type
Rapids
Copyright
© 2014 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chu, V. H. & Gao, C. 2013 False diffusion produced by flux limiters. Comput. Therm. Sci. 5 (6), 503520.Google Scholar
Ghostine, R., Vazquez, J., Terfous, A., Riviere, N., Ghenaim, A. & Mose, R. 2013 A comparative study of 1D and 2D approaches for simulating flows at right angled dividing junctions. Appl. Maths Comput. 219 (10), 50705082.Google Scholar
Hogg, A. J. & Pritchard, D. 2004 The effects of hydraulic resistance on dam-break and other shallow inertial flows. J. Fluid Mech. 501, 179212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liepmann, H. W. & Roshko, A. 2013 Elements of Gasdynamics. Courier Dover Publications.Google Scholar
Liggett, J. A. 1994 Fluid Mechanics. McGraw-Hill Higher Education.Google Scholar
Mahmodinia, S., Javan, M. & Eghbalzadeh, A. 2014 The flow field and free surface pattern of the submerged side weir with different lengths. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 39 (6), 44614472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mizumura, K., Yamasaka, M. & Adachi, J. 2003 Side outflow from supercritical channel flow. J. Hydraul. Engng 129 (10), 769776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinilla, C. E., Bouhairie, S., Tan, L. W. & Chu, V. H. 2010 Minimal intervention to simulations of shallow-water equations. J. Hydro-Environ. Res. 3 (4), 201207.Google Scholar
Ritter, A. 1892 Die Fortpflanzung der Wasserwellen. Z. Verein. Deutsch. Ing. 36 (33), 947954.Google Scholar
Subramanya, K. & Awasthy, S. C. 1972 Spatially varied flow over side-weirs. J. Hydraul. Div. 98 (1), 110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sweby, P. K. 1984 High resolution schemes using flux limiters for hyperbolic conservation laws. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 21 (5), 9951011.Google Scholar
Vazquez, J., Kesserwani, G. & Riviere, N.2008 Use of side-weir models and shallow water equations with TVD scheme for open channel bifurcations. In 11th International Conference on Urban Drainage, Edinburgh, Scotland.Google Scholar