Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T15:05:55.127Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cooperation and emergence: The missing elements of the Darwin machine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 August 2014

Jason Grotuss
Jason Grotuss*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of North Florida, Jacksonville, FL 32224. j.grotuss.157764@unf.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The authors present a compelling argument for a science of intentional change by unifying evolutionary psychology (EP) with the standard social science model; however, since its inception, traditional EP models have not held up well to empirical scrutiny. The authors address the importance of cooperation in individuals and social systems, but the Darwin machine they propose does not adequately stress fundamental aspects of evolutionary processes.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 37 , Issue 4 , August 2014 , pp. 426
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agin, D. (2006) Junk science: How politicians, corporations, and other hucksters betray us. Thomas Dunne Books.Google Scholar
Alcock, J. (2005) Animal behavior: An evolutionary approach, 8th ed. Sinauer.Google Scholar
Barve, A. & Wagner, A. (2013) A latent capacity for evolutionary innovation through exaptation in metabolic systems. Nature 500:203–206. doi:10.1038/nature12301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buss, D. M. (2004) Evolutionary psychology: The new science of the mind, 2nd ed. Pearson.Google Scholar
Dawkins, R. (1976/2006) The selfish gene, 30th anniversary ed. Oxford University Press. (Original work published in 1976.)Google Scholar
Edelman, G. M. (2004) Wider than the sky: The phenomenal gift of consciousness. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Edelman, G. M. & Tononi, G. (2000) A universe of consciousness: How matter becomes imagination. Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. & Van Orden, G. (2010) Adaptive cognition without massive modularity. Language and Cognition 2:149–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gottlieb, G. (1992) Individual development and evolution: The genesis of novel behavior. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ingber, D. E. (2006) Cellular mechanotransduction: Putting all the pieces together again. The FASEB Journal 20:811–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jain, S. & Krishna, S. (2001) A model for the emergence of cooperation, interdependence, and structure in evolving networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 98:543–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Fanu, J. (2010) The disappointments of the double helix: A master theory. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 103:43–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levin, S. A. (1998) Ecosystems and the biosphere as complex adaptive systems. Ecosystems 1:431–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levin, S. A. (2000) Multiple scales and the maintenance of biodiversity. Ecosystems 3:498–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michod, R. E. & Roze, D. (1999) Cooperation and conflict in the evolution of individuality. III. Transitions in the unit of fitness. In: Mathematical and Computational Biology: Computational Morphogenesis, Hierarchical Complexity, and Digital Evolution, ed. Nehaniv, C. L., pp. 47–91. American Mathematical Society.Google Scholar
Muller, M. N., Thompson, M. E. & Wrangham, R. W. (2006) Male chimpanzees prefer mating with old females. Current Biology 16:2234–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nowak, M. A. (2006) Five rules for the evolution of cooperation. Science 314:1560–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nowak, M. A., Sigmund, K. & Leibowitz, M. L. (2000) Cooperation versus competition. Financial Analysts Journal 56:13–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oyama, S. (1985/2000) The ontogeny of information: Developmental systems and evolution. Cambridge University Press. (Original work published in 1985.)Google Scholar
Reeve, H. K. & Keller, L. (1999) Levels of selection: Burying the units-of-selection debate and unearthing the crucial new issues. In: Levels of Selection in Evolution, ed. Keller, L., pp. 3–14. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sirois, S., Spratling, M., Thomas, M. S. C., Westermann, G., Mareschal, D. & Johnson, M. H. (2008) Précis of Neuroconstructivism: How the brain constructs cognition . Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31:321–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stokely, K., Mazza, M. G., Stanley, H. E. & Franzese, G. (2010) Effect of hydrogen bond cooperativity on the behavior of water. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107:1301–306.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wesson, R. (1991) Beyond natural selection. MIT Press.Google Scholar
West, S. A., Griffin, A. S. & Gardner, A. (2007) Evolutionary explanations for cooperation. Current Biology 17:R661–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, J. (1999) Hierarchy and scaling: Extrapolating information along a scaling ladder. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing 25:367–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zylstra, U. (1992) Living things as hierarchically organized structures. Synthese 91:111–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar