Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-17T21:56:29.496Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Preliminary Attempt to Experimentally Induce Post Event Processing in Social Anxiety Disorder

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 March 2013

Karen Rowa*
Affiliation:
St Joseph's Healthcare, Hamilton, and McMaster University, Canada
Martin M. Antony
Affiliation:
Ryerson University, Toronto, Canada
Richard P. Swinson
Affiliation:
St Joseph's Healthcare, Hamilton, and McMaster University, Canada
Randi E. McCabe
Affiliation:
St Joseph's Healthcare, Hamilton, and McMaster University, Canada
*
Reprint requests to Karen Rowa, Anxiety Treatment and Research Centre, 6th Floor Fontbonne Building, St. Joseph's Healthcare, Hamilton, 50 Charlton Avenue, East Hamilton, Ontario L8N 4A6, Canada. E-mail: krowa@stjoes.ca

Abstract

Background: Post event processing (PEP) in social anxiety disorder involves rumination about social events after the fact, and is thought to be a crucial feature of the maintenance of the disorder. Aims: The current experiment aimed to manipulate the use of PEP in individuals with social anxiety disorder. Method: Forty-one individuals with social anxiety disorder completed a videotaped speech. Anxiety ratings and degree of PEP were measured after the task as well as the day following the experiment. Results: Individuals in the distract group reported a greater decrease in anxiety from baseline to post-experimental task than those asked to focus. Individuals in the distract group also reported higher PEP about the task than those instructed to complete a focus task, which appeared to be partially accounted for by baseline differences in symptom severity and state anxiety. Degree of PEP was positively correlated with anxiety ratings, both after the experimental task as well as 24 hours later. Conclusions: These findings suggest that naturalistic PEP is problematic for individuals with social anxiety disorder, especially for those with more severe symptoms. A distraction task, even with breakthrough PEP, appears to have useful short-term effects on anxiety reduction as compared to focus instructions.

Type
Brief Clinical Reports
Copyright
Copyright © British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brozovich, F. and Heimberg, R. G. (2008). An analysis of post-event processing in social anxiety disorder. Clinical Psychology Review, 28, 891903.Google Scholar
Connor, K. M., Davidson, J. R. T., Churchill, E., Sherwood, A., Foa, E. and Weisler, R. H. (2000). Psychometric properties of the Social Phobia Inventory (SPIN): new self-rating scale. British Journal of Psychiatry, 176, 379386.Google Scholar
Kocovski, N. L., MacKenzie, M. B. and Rector, N. A. (2011). Rumination and distraction periods immediately following a speech task: effect on post-event processing in social anxiety. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 40, 4556.Google Scholar
McEvoy, P. M. and Kingsep, P. (2006). The post-event processing questionnaire in a clinic sample with social phobia. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 44, 16891697.Google Scholar
Wong, Q. J. J. and Moulds, M. L. (2009). Impact of rumination versus distraction on anxiety and maladaptive self-beliefs in socially anxious individuals. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 47, 861867.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Rowa et al. supplementary material

Extended version

Download Rowa et al. supplementary material(File)
File 75.8 KB
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.