Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T05:41:11.429Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Queering Citizenship, Queering Middle East Studies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 April 2013

Maya Mikdashi
Maya Mikdashi*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Columbia University, New York, N.Y.; e-mail: mm4247@nyu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Critical citizenship studies have argued that researchers should not take the myth of the universal unmarked citizen to heart, but rather focus on the distance between the ideal of citizenship and its everyday embodied practices and on what the citizen and the state do rather than on the state's narration of itself. As Partha Chatterjee writes in his critique of Benedict Anderson, to endorse “unbound serialities” such as the universal and anonymous citizen is to imagine that nationalism and state practices can function without governmentality. In fact, the state's job is to organize and regulate the shared life of its structurally and practically unequal citizens and residents. Normative political theory of citizenship elides the ways that governmentality and biopower produce each citizen (as well as groups of citizens) as a particular derivation from the norm. It is with each iteration of these technologies that the state comes into view as a bounded entity.

Type
Roundtable
Information
International Journal of Middle East Studies , Volume 45 , Special Issue 2: Queer Affects , May 2013 , pp. 350 - 352
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

NOTES

1 Brown, Wendy, States of Injury: Power and Freedom in Late Modernity (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press 1995)Google Scholar; Brubaker, Rogers, Nationalism Reframed: Nationhood and the National Question in the New Europe (Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press, 1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Wedeen, Lisa, Peripheral Visions: Publics, Power, and Performance in Yemen (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2007)Google Scholar.

2 Chatterjee, Partha, “Anderson's Utopia,” Diacritics 29 (1999): 128–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3 Mitchell, Timothy, “Society, Economy, and the State Effect,” in The Anthropology of the State, ed. Sharma, A. and Gupta, A. (Oxford: Blackwood, 1999)Google Scholar.

4 Joseph, Suad, “The Public/Private—The Imagined Boundary in the Imagined Nation/State/Community: The Lebanese Case,” Feminist Review, no. 57 (1995): 73–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 Pateman, Carole, The Disorder of Women: Democracy, Feminism and Political Theory (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1990)Google Scholar.

6 Stevens, Jacqueline, Reproducing the State (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1999)Google Scholar.

7 Foucault, Michel, “The Subject and Power,” Critical Inquiry 8 (1982): 777–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8 Stoler, Ann Laura, Race and the Education of Desire: Foucault's History of Sexuality and the Colonial Order of Things (Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 1995)Google Scholar.

9 Halberstam, J. Jack, The Queer Art of Failure (Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

10 Maya Mikdashi, “Practicing the Citizen: Daʿwa Secularism and Strategic Conversion in Lebanon” (PhD diss., Columbia University, forthcoming).

11 Ibid.

12 Povinelli, Elizabeth A., The Cunning of Recognition: Indigenous Alterities and the Making of Australian Multiculturalism (Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.