No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Homer the South African
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 February 2013
Extract
When reviewing a much-translated canonical text such as Homer's Iliad, it has become something of a topos to question the need for yet another translation of it. In the twenty-first century alone, Homer's Iliad has benefited from at least six published English translations already: Rodney Merrill (2007), Herbert Jordan (2008), Anthony Verity (2011), Stephen Mitchell (2011), Edward McCrorie (2012) and James Muirden (2012). Richard Whitaker adds his translation to the list with a slight variation on the standard Anglo-American English translations already available, presenting his readers instead with a ‘Southern African English’ version. With such a variety of Standard English prose and poetic translations already on offer, is there really a need for yet another Iliad? Will the novelty of its subtitle, as a ‘Southern African English’ Iliad, justify its publication, and what will prevent it from being judged merely as a postcolonial curiosity?
- Type
- Review Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013
References
Coetzee, J. M. 2008. ‘Working with translators.’ In Lianeri, A. & Zajko, V. (eds), Translation and the Classic: Identity and Change in the History of Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 407–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, S. J. 2009. ‘Introduction: the return of the classics.’ In Harrison, S. J. (ed.), Living Classics: Greece and Rome in Contemporary Poetry in English. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambert, M. 2011. The Classics and South African Identity. London: Bristol Classical Press.Google Scholar
Young, P. H. 2003. The Printed Homer: a 3,000 Year Publishing and Translation History of the Iliad and Odyssey. Jefferson, NC and London: McFarland & Co.Google Scholar