Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-27gpq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-27T08:29:33.643Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Self-similar mean dynamics in turbulent wall flows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2013

J. C. Klewicki*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824, USA Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia
*
Email address for correspondence: joe.klewicki@unh.edu

Abstract

This study investigates how and why dynamical self-similarities emerge with increasing Reynolds number within the canonical wall flows beyond the transitional regime. An overarching aim is to advance a mechanistically coherent description of turbulent wall-flow dynamics that is mathematically tractable and grounded in the mean dynamical equations. As revealed by the analysis of Fife, Klewicki & Wei (J. Discrete Continuous Dyn. Syst. A, vol. 24, 2009, pp. 781–807), the equations that respectively describe the mean dynamics of turbulent channel, pipe and boundary layer flows formally admit invariant forms. These expose an underlying self-similar structure. In all cases, two kinds of dynamical self-similarity are shown to exist on an internal domain that, for all Reynolds numbers, extends from $O(\nu / {u}_{\tau } )$ to $O(\delta )$, where $\nu $ is the kinematic viscosity, ${u}_{\tau } $ is the friction velocity and $\delta $ is the half-channel height, pipe radius, or boundary layer thickness. The simpler of the two self-similarities is operative on a large outer portion of the relevant domain. This self-similarity leads to an explicit analytical closure of the mean momentum equation. This self-similarity also underlies the emergence of a logarithmic mean velocity profile. A more complicated kind a self-similarity emerges asymptotically over a smaller domain closer to the wall. The simpler self-similarity allows the mean dynamical equation to be written as a closed system of nonlinear ordinary differential equations that, like the similarity solution for the laminar flat-plate boundary layer, can be numerically integrated. The resulting similarity solutions are demonstrated to exhibit nearly exact agreement with direct numerical simulations over the solution domain specified by the theory. At the Reynolds numbers investigated, the outer similarity solution is shown to be operative over a domain that encompasses ${\sim }40\hspace{0.167em} \% $ of the overall width of the flow. Other properties predicted by the theory are also shown to be well supported by existing data.

Type
Papers
Copyright
©2013 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abe, H, Kawamura, H. & Matsuo, Y. 2004 Surface heat-flux fluctuations in a turbulent channel flow up to $R{e}_{\tau } = 1020$ with $Pr= 0. 025$ and 0.71. Intl J. Heat Fluid Flow 25, 404419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Afzal, N. 1982 Fully developed turbulent flow in a pipe: an intermediate layer. Ing.-Arch. 52, 355377.Google Scholar
Afzal, N. 2009 Analysis of instantaneous turbulent velocity vector and temperature profiles in transitional rough channel flow. J. Heat Transfer 131, 064503.Google Scholar
Bradshaw, P. 1967 ‘Inactive’ motion and pressure fluctuations in turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 30, 241258.Google Scholar
Cantwell, B. J. 2002 Introduction to Symmetry Analysis. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Elsnab, J., Klewicki, J., Maynes, D. & Ameel, T. 2011 Mean dynamics of transitional channel flow. J. Fluid Mech. 678, 451481.Google Scholar
Eyink, G. 2008 Turbulent flow in pipes and channels as cross-stream ‘inverse cascades’ of vorticity. Phys. Fluids 20, 125101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fife, P., Klewicki, J., McMurtry, P. & Wei, T. 2005a Stress gradient balance layers and scale hierarchies in wall-bounded turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 532, 165189.Google Scholar
Fife, P., Klewicki, J., McMurtry, P. & Wei, T. 2005b Multiscaling in the presence of indeterminacy: wall-induced turbulence. Multiscale Model. Simul. 4, 936959.Google Scholar
Fife, P., Klewicki, J. & Wei, T. 2009 Time averaging in turbulence settings may reveal an infinite hierarchy of length scales. J. Discrete Continuous Dyn. Syst. 24, 781807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, A. 1964 Similarity Analysis of Boundary Value Problems in Engineering. Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Hoyas, S. & Jimenez, J. 2006 Scaling the velocity fluctuations in turbulent channels up to $R{e}_{\tau } = 2003$ . Phys. Fluids 18, 011702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Izakson, A. 1937 On the formula for the velocity distribution near walls. Tech. Phys. USSR IV 2, 155162.Google Scholar
von Kármán, T. 1930 Mechanische Ahnlichkeit und Turbulenz. Nachr. Ges. Wiss. Gottingen, Math-Phys. Klasse 155162.Google Scholar
Klewicki, J. C. 1989 Velocity–vorticity correlations related to the gradients of the Reynolds stress in parallel turbulent wall flows. Phys. Fluids A 1, 12851289.Google Scholar
Klewicki, J. 2010 Reynolds number dependence, scaling, and dynamics of turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluids Engng 132, 094001.Google Scholar
Klewicki, J., Chin, C., Blackburn, H., Ooi, A. & Marusic, I. 2012 Emergence of the four layer dynamical regime in turbulent pipe flow. Phys. Fluids 24, 045107.Google Scholar
Klewicki, J., Ebner, R. & Wu, X. 2011 Mean dynamics of transitional boundary-layer flow. J. Fluid Mech. 682, 617651.Google Scholar
Klewicki, J., Fife, P. & Wei, T. 2009 On the logarithmic mean profile. J. Fluid Mech. 638, 7393.Google Scholar
Klewicki, J., Fife, P., Wei, T. & McMurtry, P. 2007 A physical model of the turbulent boundary layer consonant with mean momentum balance structure. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 365, 823839.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laadhari, F. 2011 An apparent symmetry property of the mean velocity gradient in turbulent Poiseuille flows and its implications. Phys. Fluids 23, 101705.Google Scholar
Long, R. R. & Chen, T.-C. 1981 Experimental evidence for the existence of the mesolayer in turbulent systems. J. Fluid Mech. 105, 1959.Google Scholar
Marusic, I., Monty, J., Hultmark, M. & Smits, A. 2013 On the logarithmic region in wall turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 716, R3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mellor, G. L. 1972 The large Reynolds number, asymptotic theory of turbulent boundary layers. Intl J. Engng Sci. 10, 851873.Google Scholar
Metzger, M., Adams, P. & Fife, P. 2008 Mean momentum balance in moderately favourable pressure gradient turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 617, 107140.Google Scholar
Millikan, C. B. 1939 A critical discussion of turbulent flows in channels and circular tubes. In Proceedings of Fifth International Congress of Applied Mechanics, pp. 386392. Wiley.Google Scholar
Mizuno, Y. & Jimenez, J. 2011 Mean velocity and length scales in the overlap region of wall-bounded turbulent flows. Phys. Fluids 23, 085112.Google Scholar
Monkewitz, P., Chauhan, K. & Nagib, H. 2008 Comparison of mean flow similarity laws in zero pressure gradient turbulent boundary layers. Phys. Fluids 20, 105102.Google Scholar
Morgan, A. J. A. 1952 The reduction by one of the number of independent variables in some systems of partial differential equations. Q. J. Math. Oxford 3, 250259.Google Scholar
Morrill-Winter, C. 2012 Scale separation effects on mechanisms of wall turbulence. MS thesis, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, USA.Google Scholar
Oberlack, M. 2001 Unified approach for symmetries in plane parallel shear flows. J. Fluid Mech. 427, 299328.Google Scholar
Perry, A. & Chong, M. 1982 On the mechanism of wall turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 119, 173217.Google Scholar
Perry, A. & Marusic, I. 1995 A wall-wake model for the turbulence structure of boundary layers. Part 1. Extension of the attached eddy hypothesis. J. Fluid Mech. 298, 361388.Google Scholar
Schlatter, P. & Orlu, R. 2010 Assessment of direct numerical simulation data of turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 659, 116126.Google Scholar
Spalart, P. R., Coleman, G. N. & Johnstone, R. 2008 Direct numerical simulation of the Ekman layer: a step in Reynolds number, and cautious support for a log law with a shifted origin. Phys. Fluids 20, 101507.Google Scholar
Sreenivasan, K. R. & Sahay, A. 1997 The persistence of viscous effects in the overlap region, and the mean velocity in turbulent pipe and channel flows. In Self-Sustaining Mechanisms of Wall Turbulence (ed. Panton, R.), pp. 253272. Computational Mechanics Publications.Google Scholar
Stephani, H. 1989 Differential Equations: Their Solution Using Symmetries. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tennekes, H. & Lumley, J. 1972 A First Course in Turbulence. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wei, T., Fife, P. & Klewicki, J. 2007 On scaling the mean momentum balance and its solutions in turbulent Couette–Poiseuille flow. J. Fluid Mech. 573, 371398.Google Scholar
Wei, T., Fife, P., Klewicki, J. & McMurtry, P. 2005 Properties of the mean momentum balance in turbulent boundary layer, pipe and channel flows. J. Fluid Mech. 522, 303327.Google Scholar
Wosnik, M., Castillo, L. & George, W. K. 2000 A theory for turbulent pipe and channel flows. J. Fluid Mech. 421, 115145.Google Scholar
Wu, X. & Moin, P. 2008 A direct numerical simulation study on the mean velocity characteristics in turbulent pipe flow. J. Fluid Mech. 608, 81112.Google Scholar