Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-ws8qp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T01:12:19.594Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Policing the Perimeter: Disgust and Purity in Democratic Debate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 September 2012

Peter Hatemi
Affiliation:
Pennsylvania State University
Rose McDermott
Affiliation:
Brown University

Abstract

We explicate the precise role that one specific emotion, disgust, plays in generating political acrimony. We do this by identifying the link between the different dimensions along which moral judgments are made by those espousing different political ideologies and the different emotions which undergird these evaluations. These assessments reliably track along liberal and conservative dimensions and are linked to the way values associated with purity and sanctity elicit greater degrees of disgust among conservatives. Here, we review a growing literature showing how disgust affects the psychology of politics through its influence on the cognitive and emotional processes that govern judgments of morality, as well as its direct impact on specific policy preferences. We then apply these findings to the nature and tenor of political discourse and suggest some ways that disgust might affect the character and function of democratic debate and tolerance. Finally, we discuss what these findings mean for public policy.

Type
Features
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Altemeyer, B. 1981. Right-Wing Authoritarianism. University of Manitoba Press.Google Scholar
Bartels, Larry. 2006. “What's the Matter with What's the Matter with Kansas?Quarterly Journal of Political Science 1: 201–26.Google Scholar
Bem, Sandra L. 1981. “Gender Schema Theory: A Cognitive Account of Sex Typing.” Psychological Review 88 (4): 354–64.Google Scholar
Brader, Ted. 2006. Campaigning for Hearts and Minds. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Wendy. 1993. “Wounded Attachments.” Political Theory 21 (3): 390410.Google Scholar
Choma, Becky, Busseri, M. A., and Sadava, S. W.. 2009. “Liberal and Conservative Political Ideologies: Different Routes to Happiness?Journal of Research in Personality 43 (3): 502–05.Google Scholar
Crowe, Ellen, and Higgins, E. Tory. 1997. “Regulatory Focus and Strategic Inclinations: Promotion and Prevention in Decision-Making.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 69 (2): 117–32.Google Scholar
Curtis, Valerie, and Biran, Adam. 2001. “Dirt, Disgust and Disease: Is Hygiene in Your Genes?Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 44 (1): 1731.Google Scholar
Diener, Ed. 1994. “Assessing Subjective Well-being: Progress and Opportunities.” Social Indicators Research 31 (2): 103–57.Google Scholar
Ekman, P., and Friesen, W.V.. 1977. Manual for the Facial Action Coding System. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Elias, Norbert. 1939. The Civilizing Process. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Fessler, Daniel. 2001. “Luteal Phase Immunosuppression and Meat Eating.” Rivista di Biologia/Biology Forum 94 (3): 403–26.Google Scholar
Fiorina, Morris, Abrams, Samuel, and Pope, Jeremy. 2010. Culture Wars? The Myth of a Polarized America, 3rd ed. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Fishkin, James. 1993. Democracy and Deliberation: New Directions for Democratic Reform. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Frank, Thomas. 2004. What's the Matter with Kansas? How Conservatives Won the Heart of America. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
Graham, Jesse, Haidt, Jonathan, and Nosek, Brian A.. 2009. “Liberals and Conservatives Rely on Different Sets of Moral Foundations.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 96: 1029–46.Google Scholar
Gray, J. M., Young, A. W., Barker, W. A., Curtis, A., and Gibson, D.. 1997. “Impaired Recognition of Disgust in Huntington's Disease Gene Carriers.” Brain 120: 2029–38.Google Scholar
Haidt, Jonathan. 2012. The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Haidt, J., and Graham, J.. 2007. “When Morality Opposes Justice: Conservatives Have Moral Intuitions that Liberals May Not Recognize.” Social Justice Research 20: 98116.Google Scholar
Haidt, Jonathan, McCauley, Clark, and Rozin, Paul. 1994. Individual Differences in Sensitivity to Disgust: A Scale Sampling Seven Domains of Disgust Elicitors. Personality and Individual Differences 16 (5): 701–13.Google Scholar
Haidt, Jonathan, Rozin, Paul, McCauley, Clark, and Imada, Sumio. 1997. “Disgust and Morality Body, Psyche, and Culture.” Psychology Developing Societies 9: 107–31.Google Scholar
Hancock, Ange-Marie. 2004. The Politics of Disgust: The Public Identity and the Welfare Queen. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Harris, Lasana T., and Fiske, Susan T.. 2006. “Dehumanizing the Lowest of the Low: Neuroimaging Responses to Extreme Out-Groups.” Psychological Science 17 (10): 847–53.Google Scholar
Harris, L. T., and Fiske, Susan T.. 2007. “Social Groups That Elicit Disgust Are Differentially Processed in mPFC.” Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 2 (1): 4551.Google Scholar
Hodson, Gordon, and Costello, Kimberly. 2007. “Interpersonal Disgust, Ideological Orientations, and Dehumanization as Predictors of Intergroup Attitudes.” Psychological Science 18 (8): 691–98.Google Scholar
Inbar, Y., Knobe, J., Pizarro, D. A., and Bloom, P.. 2009. “Disgust Sensitivity Predicts Intuitive Disapproval of Gays. Emotion 9: 435–39.Google Scholar
Inbar, Y., and Pizarro, D. A.. 2009. “Grime and Punishment: How Disgust Influences Moral, Social, and Legal Judgments.” The Jury Expert 21: 1123.Google Scholar
Inbar, Y., Pizarro, D. A., and Bloom, P.. 2009. “Conservatives Are More Easily Disgusted than Liberals.” Cognition and Emotion 23: 714–25.Google Scholar
Inbar, Yoel, Pizarro, David, Iyer, Ravi, and Haidt, Jonathan. 2011. “Disgust Sensitivity, Political Conservatism, and Voting.” In Social Psychological and Personality Science 18. doi:10.1177/1948550611429024Google Scholar
Janis, Irving. 1982. Victims of Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Foreign Policy Decisions and Fiascos, 2nd Edition. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Jarudi, Izzat, Kreps, Tamar, and Bloom, Paul. 2005. “Is a Refrigerator Good or Evil? The Moral Evaluation of Everyday Objects.” Social Justice Research 21 (4): 457–69.Google Scholar
Jost, John, Glaser, Jack, Kruglanski, Arie, and Sulloway, Frank. 2003. “Political Conservatism as Motivated Social Cognition.” Psychological Bulletin 129: 339–75.Google Scholar
Jost, John T., Napier, Jaime L., Thorisdottir, Hulda, Gosling, Samuel D., Palfai, Tibor P., and Ostafin, Brian. 2007. “Are Needs to Manage Uncertainty and Threat Associated with Political Conservatism or Ideological Extremity?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 33: 789.Google Scholar
Knobe, Joshua. 2006. “The Concept of Intentional Action: A Case Study in the Uses of Folk Psychology.” Philosophical Studies 130: 203–31.Google Scholar
Koleva, Spassena, Graham, Jesse, Iyer, Ravi, Ditto, Peter, and Haidt, Jonathan. 2012. “Tracing the Threads: How Five Moral Concerns (Especially Purity) Help Explain Culture War AttitudesJournal of Research in Personality 46 (2): 184–94.Google Scholar
Krause, Sharon. 2008. Civil Passions: Moral Sentiment and Democratic Deliberation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kriesi, Hanspeter. 2007. “The Role of European Integration in National Election Campaigns.” European Union Politics 8 (1): 83108.Google Scholar
Kriesi, Hanspeter, Grande, Edgar, Lachat, Romain, Dolezal, Martin, Bornschier, Simon, and Frey, Timotheos. 2006. “Globalization and the Transformation of the National Political Space: Six European Countries Compared.” European Journal of Political Research 45 (6): 921–56.Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia. 1982. Powers of Horror: Essays in Abjection. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 2002. Moral Politics: How Liberals and Conservatives Think, 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Leone, Luigi, and Chirumbolo, Antonio. 2008. “Conservatism as Motivated Avoidance of Affect: Need for Affect Scales Predict Conservatism Measures.” Journal of Research in Personality 48: 755–62.Google Scholar
Lerner, Jennifer, and Keltner, Dacher. 2000. “Beyond Valence: Toward a Model of Emotion-Specific Influences on Judgment and Choice.” Cognition & Emotion 14: 473–93.Google Scholar
Lupia, Arthur, and Menning, Jesse. 2009. “When Can Politicians Scare Citizens into Supporting Bad Policies?American Journal of Political Science 53: 90106.Google Scholar
MacKuen, Michael, Wolak, Jennifer, Keele, Like, and Marcus, George. 2010. “Civic Engagements: Resolute Partisanship or Reflective Deliberation.” American Journal of Political Science 54: 440–58.Google Scholar
Marcus, George. 2002. The Sentimental Citizen: Emotion in Democratic Politics. University Park, PA: Penn State University Press.Google Scholar
Marcus, George, Neuman, W. Russell, and MacKuen, Michael. 2000. Affective Intelligence and Political Judgment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Marcus, George, Sullivan, John, Theiss-Morse, Elizabeth, and Wood, Sandra. 1995. With Malice Toward Some: How People Make Civil Liberties Judgments. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Milbank, Dana. 2009. “No One Said Freedom Was Pretty.” http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/11/05/AR2009110504566.html. Friday, November 6.Google Scholar
Miller, W. I. 1997. The Anatomy of Disgust. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mineka, S., and Cook, M.. 1993. “Mechanisms Involved in the Psychological Conditioning of Fear.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 122 (1): 2338.Google Scholar
Moll, Jorge, de Oliveira-Souza, Ricardo, Moll, Fernanda Tovar, Ignácio, Fátima Azevedo, Bramati, Ivanei E., Caparelli-Dáquer, Egas M., and Eslinger, Paul J.. 2005. “The Moral Affiliations of Disgust: A Functional MRI Study.” Cog Behav Neurol 18 (1): 6878.Google Scholar
Moore, Barrington. 2000. Moral Purity and Persecution in History. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Moretti, Laura, and di Pellegrino, Giuseppe. 2010. “Disgust Selectively Modulates Reciprocal Fairness in Economic Interactions.” Emotion 10 (2): 169–80.Google Scholar
Morrell, Michael. 2010. Empathy and Democracy: Feeling, Thinking and Deliberation. University Park, PA: Penn State Press.Google Scholar
Navarrete, C., and Fessler, Daniel. 2006. “Disease Avoidance and Ethnocentrism: The Effects of Disease Vulnerability and Disgust Sensitivity on Intergroup Attitude.” Evolution and Human Behavior 27: 270–82.Google Scholar
Navarrete, C., Fessler, D., and Eng, S.. 2007. “Elevated Ethnocentrism in the First Trimester of Pregnancy.” Evolution and Human Behavior 28: 6065.Google Scholar
Nesse, R. M., and Williams, G. C.. 1995. Why We Get Sick: The New Science of Darwinian Medicine. New York: Times Books.Google Scholar
Neumann, Russell, Marcus, George E., Crigler, Ann, and MacKuen, Michael. 2007. The Affect Effect: Dynamics of Emotion in Political Thinking and Behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Nichols, Steve. 2002. “Norms with Feeling: Towards a Psychological Account of Moral Judgement.” Cognition 84 (2): 221–36.Google Scholar
Norval, Aletta. 2008. Aversive Democracy: Inheritance and Originality and the Democratic Tradition. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Oxley, D. R., Smith, K. B., Hibbing, M. W., Miller, J. L., Alford, J. R. Jr., Hatemi, P. K., and Hibbing, J. R.. 2008. “Political Attitudes Are Predicted by Physiological Traits.” Science 321: 1667–70.Google Scholar
Parkinson, Carolyn, Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter, Koralus, Philipp, Mendelovici, Angela, McGeer, Victoria, and Wheatley, Thalia. 2011. “Is Morality Unified? Evidence that Distinct Neural Systems Underlie Moral Judgments of Harm, Dishonesty, and Disgust.” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 23 (10): 3162–180.Google Scholar
Petersen, M. B., Slothuus, R., and Togeby, L.. 2010. “Political Parties and Value Consistency in Public Opinion Formation.” Public Opinion Quarterly 74 (3): 530–50.Google Scholar
Phillips, M. L., Young, A. W., Senior, C., et al. 1997. “A Specific Neural Substrate for Perceiving Facial Expressions of Disgust.” Nature 389: 495–98.Google Scholar
Pinker, Steven. 1998. How the Mind Works. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Pizarro, David, Inbar, Yoel, and Helion, Chelsea. 2011. “On Disgust and Moral Judgment.” Emotion 3: 267–68.Google Scholar
Quattrone, George, and Tversky, Amos. 1988. “Contrasting Rational and Psychological Analysis of Political Choice.” American Political Science Review 82: 719–36.Google Scholar
Rozin, P., and Fallon, April. 1987. “A Perspective on Disgust.” Psychological Review 94 (1): 2341.Google Scholar
Rozin, P., Haidt, J., and Fincher, K.. 2009. “From Oral to Moral.” Science 323: 1179–80.Google Scholar
Rozin, P., Haidt, J., and McCauley, C.. 1999a. “Individual Differences in Disgust Sensitivity: Comparisons and Evaluations of Paper-and-Pencil versus Behavioral Measures.” Journal of Research in Personality 33: 330–51.Google Scholar
Rozin, P., Lowery, L., Imada, S., and Haidt, J.. 1999b. “The CAD Triad Hypothesis: A Mapping between Three Moral Emotions (Contempt, Anger, Disgust) and Three Moral Codes (Community, Autonomy, Divinity).” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 76 (4): 574–86.Google Scholar
Sabl, Andrew. 2002. Ruling Passions: Political Offices and Democratic Ethics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Skitka, Linda J. 2002. “Do the Means Always Justify the Ends, or Do the Ends Sometimes Justify the Means? A Value Model of Justice Reasoning.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 28 (5): 588–97.Google Scholar
Skitka, Linda, Bauman, Christopher W., and Sargis, Edward G.. 2005. “Moral Conviction: Another Contributor to Attitude Strength or Something More?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 88: 895917.Google Scholar
Smith, Kevin, Oxley, Douglas, Hibbing, Matt, Alford, John, and Hibbing, John. 2009. “The Ick Factor: Physiological Sensitivity to Disgust as a Predictor of Political Attitudes.” Presentation to the Midwest Political Science Association Meeting, Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
Thiele, Leslie Paul. 2006. The Heart of Judgment: Practical Wisdom, Narrative, and Neuroscience. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tompkins, Sylvan. 1965. “The Psychology of Being Right—and Left.” Society 3: 2327.Google Scholar
Wisneski, Daniel, Lytle, Brad, and Skitka, Linda J.. 2009. “Gut Reactions: Moral Conviction, Religiosity, and Trust in Authority.” Psychological Science 20: 1059–63.Google Scholar